先天性长QT综合征的遗传变异注释评分

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1111/anec.13080
Arwa Younis MD, Christopher Bodurian BA, Dan E. Arking PhD, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi MD, PhD, MPH, Chadi Tabaja MD, Wojciech Zareba MD, PhD, Scott McNitt MS, Mehmet K. Aktas MD, MBA, Bronislava Polonsky MS, Coeli M. Lopes PhD, Nona Sotoodehnia MD, Peter J. Kudenchuk MD, Ilan Goldenberg MD
{"title":"先天性长QT综合征的遗传变异注释评分","authors":"Arwa Younis MD,&nbsp;Christopher Bodurian BA,&nbsp;Dan E. Arking PhD,&nbsp;Nicola Luigi Bragazzi MD, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Chadi Tabaja MD,&nbsp;Wojciech Zareba MD, PhD,&nbsp;Scott McNitt MS,&nbsp;Mehmet K. Aktas MD, MBA,&nbsp;Bronislava Polonsky MS,&nbsp;Coeli M. Lopes PhD,&nbsp;Nona Sotoodehnia MD,&nbsp;Peter J. Kudenchuk MD,&nbsp;Ilan Goldenberg MD","doi":"10.1111/anec.13080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is a hereditary arrhythmic disorder. We aimed to assess the performance of current genetic variant annotation scores among LQTS patients and their predictive impact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated 2025 patients with unique mutations for LQT1–LQT3. A patient-specific score was calculated for each of four established genetic variant annotation algorithms: CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2. The scores were tested for the identification of LQTS and their predictive performance for cardiac events (CE) and life-threatening events (LTE) and then compared with the predictive performance of LQTS categorization based on mutation location/function. Score performance was tested using Harrell's C-index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 917 subjects were classified as LQT1, 838 as LQT2, and 270 as LQT3. The identification of a pathogenic variant occurred in 99% with CADD, 92% with SIFT, 100% with REVEL, and 86% with PolyPhen-2. However, none of the genetic scores correlated with the risk of CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52) or LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52). In contrast, high-risk mutation categorization based on location/function was a powerful independent predictor of CE (HR = 1.88; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and LTE (HR = 1.89, <i>p</i> &lt; .001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In congenital LQTS patients, well-established algorithms (CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2) were able to identify the majority of the causal variants as pathogenic. However, the scores did not predict clinical outcomes. These results indicate that mutation location/functional assays are essential for accurate interpretation of the risk associated with LQTS mutations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/ad/ANEC-28-e13080.PMC10475886.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic variant annotation scores in congenital long QT syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Arwa Younis MD,&nbsp;Christopher Bodurian BA,&nbsp;Dan E. Arking PhD,&nbsp;Nicola Luigi Bragazzi MD, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Chadi Tabaja MD,&nbsp;Wojciech Zareba MD, PhD,&nbsp;Scott McNitt MS,&nbsp;Mehmet K. Aktas MD, MBA,&nbsp;Bronislava Polonsky MS,&nbsp;Coeli M. Lopes PhD,&nbsp;Nona Sotoodehnia MD,&nbsp;Peter J. Kudenchuk MD,&nbsp;Ilan Goldenberg MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anec.13080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is a hereditary arrhythmic disorder. We aimed to assess the performance of current genetic variant annotation scores among LQTS patients and their predictive impact.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We evaluated 2025 patients with unique mutations for LQT1–LQT3. A patient-specific score was calculated for each of four established genetic variant annotation algorithms: CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2. The scores were tested for the identification of LQTS and their predictive performance for cardiac events (CE) and life-threatening events (LTE) and then compared with the predictive performance of LQTS categorization based on mutation location/function. Score performance was tested using Harrell's C-index.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 917 subjects were classified as LQT1, 838 as LQT2, and 270 as LQT3. The identification of a pathogenic variant occurred in 99% with CADD, 92% with SIFT, 100% with REVEL, and 86% with PolyPhen-2. However, none of the genetic scores correlated with the risk of CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52) or LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52). In contrast, high-risk mutation categorization based on location/function was a powerful independent predictor of CE (HR = 1.88; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and LTE (HR = 1.89, <i>p</i> &lt; .001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In congenital LQTS patients, well-established algorithms (CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2) were able to identify the majority of the causal variants as pathogenic. However, the scores did not predict clinical outcomes. These results indicate that mutation location/functional assays are essential for accurate interpretation of the risk associated with LQTS mutations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/ad/ANEC-28-e13080.PMC10475886.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.13080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.13080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景先天性长QT综合征是一种遗传性心律失常。我们的目的是评估当前遗传变异注释评分在LQTS患者中的表现及其预测影响。方法我们评估了2025例LQT1-LQT3独特突变的患者。计算四种已建立的遗传变异注释算法(CADD、SIFT、REVEL和polyphen2)的患者特异性评分。测试了LQTS的识别及其对心脏事件(CE)和危及生命事件(LTE)的预测性能,然后与基于突变位置/功能的LQTS分类的预测性能进行了比较。分数表现采用哈勒尔c指数进行测试。结果LQT1组917例,LQT2组838例,LQT3组270例。CADD的致病性变异检出率为99%,SIFT的检出率为92%,REVEL的检出率为100%,polyphen2的检出率为86%。然而,没有一个遗传评分与CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, polyphen2 = 0.52)或LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, polyphen2 = 0.52)的风险相关。相比之下,基于位置/功能的高危突变分类是CE的一个强大的独立预测因子(HR = 1.88;p < .001)和LTE (HR = 1.89, p < .001)。结论在先天性LQTS患者中,完善的算法(CADD, SIFT, REVEL和polyphen2)能够识别大多数致病变异。然而,分数并不能预测临床结果。这些结果表明,突变定位/功能分析对于准确解释与LQTS突变相关的风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genetic variant annotation scores in congenital long QT syndrome

Background

Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is a hereditary arrhythmic disorder. We aimed to assess the performance of current genetic variant annotation scores among LQTS patients and their predictive impact.

Methods

We evaluated 2025 patients with unique mutations for LQT1–LQT3. A patient-specific score was calculated for each of four established genetic variant annotation algorithms: CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2. The scores were tested for the identification of LQTS and their predictive performance for cardiac events (CE) and life-threatening events (LTE) and then compared with the predictive performance of LQTS categorization based on mutation location/function. Score performance was tested using Harrell's C-index.

Results

A total of 917 subjects were classified as LQT1, 838 as LQT2, and 270 as LQT3. The identification of a pathogenic variant occurred in 99% with CADD, 92% with SIFT, 100% with REVEL, and 86% with PolyPhen-2. However, none of the genetic scores correlated with the risk of CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52) or LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52). In contrast, high-risk mutation categorization based on location/function was a powerful independent predictor of CE (HR = 1.88; p < .001) and LTE (HR = 1.89, p < .001).

Conclusion

In congenital LQTS patients, well-established algorithms (CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2) were able to identify the majority of the causal variants as pathogenic. However, the scores did not predict clinical outcomes. These results indicate that mutation location/functional assays are essential for accurate interpretation of the risk associated with LQTS mutations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation. ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Different Insulin Resistance Indices and Heart Failure in US Adults With Diabetes Mellitus Coronary Angiographic Features of de Winter Syndrome: More Than Just Occlusion of the Left Anterior Descending Artery Intracardiac Echocardiography and Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Dextrocardia Introducing a Novel Pacemaker-Mediated Arrhythmia: The Pseudo-RNRVAS Arising From Atrial Capture Challenges. Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Premature Contractions Originating From RVOT With Interruption of the Inferior Vena Cava-A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1