追求“信息建筑的杰作”之比较——从詹姆斯·乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》与理查德·索尔·沃曼的《城市、形式与意图》学习

Dan Klyn
{"title":"追求“信息建筑的杰作”之比较——从詹姆斯·乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》与理查德·索尔·沃曼的《城市、形式与意图》学习","authors":"Dan Klyn","doi":"10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>EDITOR'S SUMMARY</p>\n <p>In a search for classic works on information architecture, Joyce's <i>Ulysses</i> and Richard Saul Wurman's <i>The City, Form and Intent</i> are each compared internally across different versions and considered in terms of content, context and user. Each author modified readers' experiences through changes in the content and physical form of their works. Wurman's 1963 work, a loose-leaf collection reflecting architecture through clay models of cities, was redone in 1974 with the same content but different physical presentation. Joyce's <i>Ulysses</i> was marked by variations across versions, with omissions, additions and typographic errors carried inconsistently through editions, leaving the author's intended meaning ambiguous. The context of Wurman's work was the very early stage in the author's career. The context of production of <i>Ulysses</i> involved composition, editing, publishing, correction and republishing across multiple channels, making consideration of the totality of the editions key to understanding the information architecture of the work. Users of Wurman's original print work exalted it, while users of a 2014 spin-off web project see it from a different perspective. Similarly, the user experience for <i>Ulysses</i> varies widely, depending largely on which edition is read. The analysis and internal comparison of the two works highlight the importance of both content knowledge and technical skill throughout any information architecture project. Whether they will serve as masterworks for the field remains an open question.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100205,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420508","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison in Pursuit of “The Masterworks of Information Architecture”: Learning from James Joyce's Ulysses and Richard Saul Wurman's The City, Form and Intent\",\"authors\":\"Dan Klyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>EDITOR'S SUMMARY</p>\\n <p>In a search for classic works on information architecture, Joyce's <i>Ulysses</i> and Richard Saul Wurman's <i>The City, Form and Intent</i> are each compared internally across different versions and considered in terms of content, context and user. Each author modified readers' experiences through changes in the content and physical form of their works. Wurman's 1963 work, a loose-leaf collection reflecting architecture through clay models of cities, was redone in 1974 with the same content but different physical presentation. Joyce's <i>Ulysses</i> was marked by variations across versions, with omissions, additions and typographic errors carried inconsistently through editions, leaving the author's intended meaning ambiguous. The context of Wurman's work was the very early stage in the author's career. The context of production of <i>Ulysses</i> involved composition, editing, publishing, correction and republishing across multiple channels, making consideration of the totality of the editions key to understanding the information architecture of the work. Users of Wurman's original print work exalted it, while users of a 2014 spin-off web project see it from a different perspective. Similarly, the user experience for <i>Ulysses</i> varies widely, depending largely on which edition is read. The analysis and internal comparison of the two works highlight the importance of both content knowledge and technical skill throughout any information architecture project. Whether they will serve as masterworks for the field remains an open question.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420508\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在对信息建筑经典作品的搜索中,乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》和理查德·索尔·沃曼的《城市》,形式和意图在不同版本之间进行了内部比较,并从内容、背景和用户的角度进行了考虑。每位作者都通过改变作品的内容和形式来改变读者的体验。沃曼1963年的作品是一本通过城市泥塑模型反映建筑的活页集,1974年重新制作,内容相同,但物理表现不同。乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》在不同版本之间存在差异,删减、增补和排版错误在不同版本之间不一致,使作者的意图模糊不清。沃曼作品的背景是作者职业生涯的早期阶段。《尤利西斯》的创作过程涉及多种渠道的作曲、编辑、出版、修改和再版,因此考虑版本的整体性是理解这部作品信息架构的关键。沃曼最初的印刷作品的用户称赞它,而2014年衍生网络项目的用户则从不同的角度看待它。同样,《尤利西斯》的用户体验差别很大,很大程度上取决于你读的是哪个版本。对这两部作品的分析和内部比较突出了内容知识和技术技能在任何信息体系结构项目中的重要性。它们是否会成为该领域的杰作仍是一个悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison in Pursuit of “The Masterworks of Information Architecture”: Learning from James Joyce's Ulysses and Richard Saul Wurman's The City, Form and Intent

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

In a search for classic works on information architecture, Joyce's Ulysses and Richard Saul Wurman's The City, Form and Intent are each compared internally across different versions and considered in terms of content, context and user. Each author modified readers' experiences through changes in the content and physical form of their works. Wurman's 1963 work, a loose-leaf collection reflecting architecture through clay models of cities, was redone in 1974 with the same content but different physical presentation. Joyce's Ulysses was marked by variations across versions, with omissions, additions and typographic errors carried inconsistently through editions, leaving the author's intended meaning ambiguous. The context of Wurman's work was the very early stage in the author's career. The context of production of Ulysses involved composition, editing, publishing, correction and republishing across multiple channels, making consideration of the totality of the editions key to understanding the information architecture of the work. Users of Wurman's original print work exalted it, while users of a 2014 spin-off web project see it from a different perspective. Similarly, the user experience for Ulysses varies widely, depending largely on which edition is read. The analysis and internal comparison of the two works highlight the importance of both content knowledge and technical skill throughout any information architecture project. Whether they will serve as masterworks for the field remains an open question.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Four Claims on Research Assessment and Metric Use in the Humanities Using Zombies to Teach Collaborative Scholarship and Born-Digital Publishing 2016 ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon: Report and Recommendations Open Access Publishing Models and How OA Can Work in the Humanities Collaboration in the Spotlight: The Open Symphony Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1