范围和吸引:宫腔镜引导下疤痕妊娠剖宫产抽吸术-一种安全有效的治疗方法。

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.gmit_87_22
Mohamed Siraj Shahul Hameed, Ann Wright, Bernard Su Min Chern
{"title":"范围和吸引:宫腔镜引导下疤痕妊娠剖宫产抽吸术-一种安全有效的治疗方法。","authors":"Mohamed Siraj Shahul Hameed,&nbsp;Ann Wright,&nbsp;Bernard Su Min Chern","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_87_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of CSP over 2 years. This study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH), Singapore, thirty-seven patients with a CSP. Hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation to treat CSP used alone or in combination with laparoscopy depending on residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and future fertility requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of women (29) were diagnosed under 9-week gestation. Just over a third (13) had an RMT of more than 3 mm. Women with an RMT <3 mm had added laparoscopy. In total, 22 women had hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation with 9 having it performed under laparoscopic guidance because the RMT was under 3 mm. The remaining patients underwent either laparoscopic repair (5 cases) or vaginal repair (1 case) done under laparoscopic guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation of CSP has the potential to become part of the routine management for uncomplicated cases of CSP in women with an RMT of greater than 3 mm who do not wish for future pregnancy. Its use, in combination with other minimally invasive techniques, can be extended to more complex cases where the RMT is <3 mm and future fertility is desired.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"12 2","pages":"72-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/51/GMIT-12-72.PMC10321336.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scope and Suction: Hysteroscopic-guided Suction Evacuation of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy - A Safe and Efficacious Treatment for Selected Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Siraj Shahul Hameed,&nbsp;Ann Wright,&nbsp;Bernard Su Min Chern\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/gmit.gmit_87_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of CSP over 2 years. This study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH), Singapore, thirty-seven patients with a CSP. Hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation to treat CSP used alone or in combination with laparoscopy depending on residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and future fertility requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of women (29) were diagnosed under 9-week gestation. Just over a third (13) had an RMT of more than 3 mm. Women with an RMT <3 mm had added laparoscopy. In total, 22 women had hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation with 9 having it performed under laparoscopic guidance because the RMT was under 3 mm. The remaining patients underwent either laparoscopic repair (5 cases) or vaginal repair (1 case) done under laparoscopic guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation of CSP has the potential to become part of the routine management for uncomplicated cases of CSP in women with an RMT of greater than 3 mm who do not wish for future pregnancy. Its use, in combination with other minimally invasive techniques, can be extended to more complex cases where the RMT is <3 mm and future fertility is desired.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"72-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/51/GMIT-12-72.PMC10321336.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_87_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_87_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨宫腔镜引导下抽吸引流术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的效果。材料和方法:回顾性分析2年以上的CSP病例。本研究在新加坡KK妇女儿童医院(KKH)对37例CSP患者进行了研究。宫腔镜引导下的抽吸引流治疗CSP,根据残余肌层厚度(RMT)和未来生育需求单独或联合腹腔镜。结果:大多数女性(29例)在妊娠9周以下确诊。超过三分之一(13)的RMT超过3毫米。结论:对于RMT大于3mm且不希望将来怀孕的无并发症的CSP患者,宫腔镜引导下的CSP抽吸术有可能成为常规治疗的一部分。它的使用,结合其他微创技术,可以扩展到更复杂的情况下,RMT
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scope and Suction: Hysteroscopic-guided Suction Evacuation of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy - A Safe and Efficacious Treatment for Selected Patients.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of CSP over 2 years. This study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH), Singapore, thirty-seven patients with a CSP. Hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation to treat CSP used alone or in combination with laparoscopy depending on residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and future fertility requirements.

Results: The majority of women (29) were diagnosed under 9-week gestation. Just over a third (13) had an RMT of more than 3 mm. Women with an RMT <3 mm had added laparoscopy. In total, 22 women had hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation with 9 having it performed under laparoscopic guidance because the RMT was under 3 mm. The remaining patients underwent either laparoscopic repair (5 cases) or vaginal repair (1 case) done under laparoscopic guidance.

Conclusion: Hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation of CSP has the potential to become part of the routine management for uncomplicated cases of CSP in women with an RMT of greater than 3 mm who do not wish for future pregnancy. Its use, in combination with other minimally invasive techniques, can be extended to more complex cases where the RMT is <3 mm and future fertility is desired.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Technique of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage after a Mersilene Tape Erosion in a Prior Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy and Transvaginal Cerclage Patient. Comment on "Evaluation of the success of hysteroscopic uterine septum resection". Hysteroscopic Uterine Septum Resection: Is it a Successful Treatment for Infertile Patients? Laparoscopic Excision of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: An Optimum Management Option. Laparoscopic Posterior Pelvic Exenteration with Radical Vulvectomy for Intestinal-type Vulvar Adenocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1