影响葡萄牙精神卫生保健使用强制措施的环境因素

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101918
Deborah Oyine Aluh , Margarida Santos-Dias , Manuela Silva , Barbara Pedrosa , Ugnė Grigaitė , Ricardo Caetano Silva , Maria Ferreira de Almeida Mousinho , João Paulo Antunes , Mariana Remelhe , Graça Cardoso , José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida
{"title":"影响葡萄牙精神卫生保健使用强制措施的环境因素","authors":"Deborah Oyine Aluh ,&nbsp;Margarida Santos-Dias ,&nbsp;Manuela Silva ,&nbsp;Barbara Pedrosa ,&nbsp;Ugnė Grigaitė ,&nbsp;Ricardo Caetano Silva ,&nbsp;Maria Ferreira de Almeida Mousinho ,&nbsp;João Paulo Antunes ,&nbsp;Mariana Remelhe ,&nbsp;Graça Cardoso ,&nbsp;José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of coercive measures in mental health care is an important indicator of the quality of care being provided, and non-patient-related factors are increasingly recognized to contribute to their use. The study aimed to explore the perspectives of mental health care professionals who have first-hand experience with the use of coercion on the contextual factors that influence the use of coercion in the Portuguese mental health care. Five focus group discussions were conducted among 23 doctors and 17 nurses from five psychiatric departments in urban and rural regions of Portugal. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with the aid of MAXQDA. Four broad themes related to insufficient resources, staff-related factors, inefficient services, and socio-legal factors were derived. Participants highlighted how inadequate structures, staff shortages, staff attitudes, a lack of training, restrictive ward rules, an inefficient organization of services, the mental health legislation, and public attitudes contributed to the use of coercive measures. The COVID-19 pandemic complicated existing shortfalls in the system and increased the use of coercive measures. The study confirms that the use of coercive measures in mental health care is influenced by factors that are independent of patient characteristics. Addressing existing systemic problems is crucial for the successful implementation of interventions to reduce coercion in mental health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 101918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual factors influencing the use of coercive measures in Portuguese mental health care\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Oyine Aluh ,&nbsp;Margarida Santos-Dias ,&nbsp;Manuela Silva ,&nbsp;Barbara Pedrosa ,&nbsp;Ugnė Grigaitė ,&nbsp;Ricardo Caetano Silva ,&nbsp;Maria Ferreira de Almeida Mousinho ,&nbsp;João Paulo Antunes ,&nbsp;Mariana Remelhe ,&nbsp;Graça Cardoso ,&nbsp;José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of coercive measures in mental health care is an important indicator of the quality of care being provided, and non-patient-related factors are increasingly recognized to contribute to their use. The study aimed to explore the perspectives of mental health care professionals who have first-hand experience with the use of coercion on the contextual factors that influence the use of coercion in the Portuguese mental health care. Five focus group discussions were conducted among 23 doctors and 17 nurses from five psychiatric departments in urban and rural regions of Portugal. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with the aid of MAXQDA. Four broad themes related to insufficient resources, staff-related factors, inefficient services, and socio-legal factors were derived. Participants highlighted how inadequate structures, staff shortages, staff attitudes, a lack of training, restrictive ward rules, an inefficient organization of services, the mental health legislation, and public attitudes contributed to the use of coercive measures. The COVID-19 pandemic complicated existing shortfalls in the system and increased the use of coercive measures. The study confirms that the use of coercive measures in mental health care is influenced by factors that are independent of patient characteristics. Addressing existing systemic problems is crucial for the successful implementation of interventions to reduce coercion in mental health care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在精神保健中使用强制措施是所提供护理质量的一个重要指标,人们越来越认识到与患者无关的因素有助于使用这些措施。本研究旨在探讨具有使用胁迫第一手经验的精神卫生保健专业人员对影响葡萄牙精神卫生保健中使用胁迫的背景因素的看法。在葡萄牙城市和农村地区的5个精神科的23名医生和17名护士中进行了5次焦点小组讨论。讨论录音,转录,并在MAXQDA的帮助下进行分析。得出了与资源不足、与工作人员有关的因素、服务效率低下和社会法律因素有关的四个广泛主题。与会者着重指出,结构不充分、工作人员短缺、工作人员态度、缺乏培训、限制性病房规则、服务组织效率低下、心理健康立法和公众态度是如何促成使用强制措施的。2019冠状病毒病大流行加剧了现有制度的不足,并增加了强制措施的使用。该研究证实,在精神卫生保健中使用强制措施受到与患者特征无关的因素的影响。解决现有的系统性问题对于成功实施干预措施以减少精神卫生保健中的强迫行为至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contextual factors influencing the use of coercive measures in Portuguese mental health care

The use of coercive measures in mental health care is an important indicator of the quality of care being provided, and non-patient-related factors are increasingly recognized to contribute to their use. The study aimed to explore the perspectives of mental health care professionals who have first-hand experience with the use of coercion on the contextual factors that influence the use of coercion in the Portuguese mental health care. Five focus group discussions were conducted among 23 doctors and 17 nurses from five psychiatric departments in urban and rural regions of Portugal. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with the aid of MAXQDA. Four broad themes related to insufficient resources, staff-related factors, inefficient services, and socio-legal factors were derived. Participants highlighted how inadequate structures, staff shortages, staff attitudes, a lack of training, restrictive ward rules, an inefficient organization of services, the mental health legislation, and public attitudes contributed to the use of coercive measures. The COVID-19 pandemic complicated existing shortfalls in the system and increased the use of coercive measures. The study confirms that the use of coercive measures in mental health care is influenced by factors that are independent of patient characteristics. Addressing existing systemic problems is crucial for the successful implementation of interventions to reduce coercion in mental health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
The response of the secretary of state and the “supervised discharge” provision of the UK mental health bill 2022: Potential problems and opportunities in the wake of Secretary of State for Justice v MM [2018] UKSC 60 Capacity and incapacity: An appropriate border for non-consensual interventions? Child maltreatment and suicidal ideation among justice–and welfare–involved adolescents in Nigeria: Investigating the mediating role of social support and emotion regulation Editorial Board Recent research involving consent, alcohol intoxication, and memory: Implications for expert testimony in sexual assault cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1