无抗血管内皮生长因子的超声乳化术治疗naïve糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效。

IF 0.3 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.3126/nepjoph.v14i2.46706
Roshija Khanal Rijal, Sushant Adiga, Kaushal Pokharel, Sabin Dhakal, Thaneshwar Rijal, Sitaram Khadka
{"title":"无抗血管内皮生长因子的超声乳化术治疗naïve糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效。","authors":"Roshija Khanal Rijal,&nbsp;Sushant Adiga,&nbsp;Kaushal Pokharel,&nbsp;Sabin Dhakal,&nbsp;Thaneshwar Rijal,&nbsp;Sitaram Khadka","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v14i2.46706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study was conducted at ASG Eye Hospital, Kathmandu to evaluate the outcome of phacoemulsification without anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in patients with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Records of all patients who underwent phacoemulsification without Bevacizumab in treatment of naïve patients with any grade of non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) were seen. Pre-operative and post-operative visual acuity along with central macular thickness (CMT) was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 32 eyes of 20 patients with treatment naïve non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy who underwent phacoemulsification. Twelve were men and eight were women with an average age of 69.2 years (range 55 years to 83 years). The average preoperative central macular thickness as measured on optical coherence tomography was 254.63± 20.25 microns and 1-month postoperative central macular thickness was 254.72± 19.96 microns; the study did not find any significant difference (p-value 0.918). The average difference in the central macular thickness between the 1-month postoperative and preoperative values was 0.09 microns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uneventful phacoemulsification in eyes with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy does not cause an increase in central macular thickness after surgery and thus anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as an adjunct is not mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of phacoemulsification without anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Roshija Khanal Rijal,&nbsp;Sushant Adiga,&nbsp;Kaushal Pokharel,&nbsp;Sabin Dhakal,&nbsp;Thaneshwar Rijal,&nbsp;Sitaram Khadka\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/nepjoph.v14i2.46706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study was conducted at ASG Eye Hospital, Kathmandu to evaluate the outcome of phacoemulsification without anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in patients with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Records of all patients who underwent phacoemulsification without Bevacizumab in treatment of naïve patients with any grade of non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) were seen. Pre-operative and post-operative visual acuity along with central macular thickness (CMT) was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 32 eyes of 20 patients with treatment naïve non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy who underwent phacoemulsification. Twelve were men and eight were women with an average age of 69.2 years (range 55 years to 83 years). The average preoperative central macular thickness as measured on optical coherence tomography was 254.63± 20.25 microns and 1-month postoperative central macular thickness was 254.72± 19.96 microns; the study did not find any significant difference (p-value 0.918). The average difference in the central macular thickness between the 1-month postoperative and preoperative values was 0.09 microns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uneventful phacoemulsification in eyes with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy does not cause an increase in central macular thickness after surgery and thus anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as an adjunct is not mandatory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v14i2.46706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v14i2.46706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性、非随机、观察性研究是在加德满都的ASG眼科医院进行的,目的是评估不使用抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗naïve糖尿病视网膜病变患者的超声乳化术的结果。材料和方法:观察所有未使用贝伐单抗的超声乳化术治疗naïve任何级别非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)患者的记录。比较术前、术后视力及中央黄斑厚度(CMT)。结果:该研究包括20例32眼的naïve非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者,他们接受了超声乳化术。男性12人,女性8人,平均年龄69.2岁(55岁至83岁)。术前光学相干断层扫描平均黄斑中央厚度为254.63±20.25微米,术后1个月平均黄斑中央厚度为254.72±19.96微米;本研究未发现显著性差异(p值0.918)。术后1个月黄斑中央厚度与术前平均差值为0.09微米。结论:在治疗naïve糖尿病视网膜病变的眼睛中进行超声乳化术不会引起术后黄斑中央厚度的增加,因此抗血管内皮生长因子作为辅助治疗不是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of phacoemulsification without anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy.

Introduction: This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study was conducted at ASG Eye Hospital, Kathmandu to evaluate the outcome of phacoemulsification without anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in patients with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy.

Materials and methods: Records of all patients who underwent phacoemulsification without Bevacizumab in treatment of naïve patients with any grade of non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) were seen. Pre-operative and post-operative visual acuity along with central macular thickness (CMT) was compared.

Results: The study comprised 32 eyes of 20 patients with treatment naïve non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy who underwent phacoemulsification. Twelve were men and eight were women with an average age of 69.2 years (range 55 years to 83 years). The average preoperative central macular thickness as measured on optical coherence tomography was 254.63± 20.25 microns and 1-month postoperative central macular thickness was 254.72± 19.96 microns; the study did not find any significant difference (p-value 0.918). The average difference in the central macular thickness between the 1-month postoperative and preoperative values was 0.09 microns.

Conclusion: Uneventful phacoemulsification in eyes with treatment naïve diabetic retinopathy does not cause an increase in central macular thickness after surgery and thus anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as an adjunct is not mandatory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ocular Findings among the Patients of Renal Transplantation Radius-Maumenee Syndrome, A Rare Entity: A Case Report Developing Artificial Intelligence Model for Prediction of Diabetic Retinopathy and Delivering in a real-world Local Context: BP Eye Foundation’s Perspective A Case of Full Thickness Parafoveal Hole Associated with Chorio-Retinal Atrophy Hyperostotic Sphenoid Wing Meningioma with Proptosis: A Rare Case Report with Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1