周末入院对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡风险的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1177/00369330231189887
Haiyan Xiong, Linlin Shi
{"title":"周末入院对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡风险的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Haiyan Xiong, Linlin Shi","doi":"10.1177/00369330231189887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an ongoing debate if weekend admissions of critically ill patients are associated with higher mortality rates. The current review aimed to specifically assess this effect in sepsis and septic shock patients by comparing mortality rates with weekend versus weekday admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 20th February 2023 with an additional search of Google Scholar for gray literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were eligible. Meta-analysis of all nine studies with data from 1,134,417 patients demonstrated that sepsis or septic shock patients admitted on weekends don't have higher mortality as compared to those admitted on weekdays (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.09; p = 0.05; I<sup>2 </sup>= 93%). On subgroup analysis based on sample size (>2000 or <2000 patients) and timing of mortality, we noted no difference in the significance of the results. However, there was a small significant increased risk of mortality with weekend admission noted in studies on the Asian population and including septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weekend admission does not have an adverse impact on mortality rates of sepsis and septic shock patients. Results must be interpreted with caution owing to high interstudy heterogeneity and variation in confounders adjusted by individual studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"91-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of weekend admission on mortality risk in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haiyan Xiong, Linlin Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00369330231189887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an ongoing debate if weekend admissions of critically ill patients are associated with higher mortality rates. The current review aimed to specifically assess this effect in sepsis and septic shock patients by comparing mortality rates with weekend versus weekday admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 20th February 2023 with an additional search of Google Scholar for gray literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were eligible. Meta-analysis of all nine studies with data from 1,134,417 patients demonstrated that sepsis or septic shock patients admitted on weekends don't have higher mortality as compared to those admitted on weekdays (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.09; p = 0.05; I<sup>2 </sup>= 93%). On subgroup analysis based on sample size (>2000 or <2000 patients) and timing of mortality, we noted no difference in the significance of the results. However, there was a small significant increased risk of mortality with weekend admission noted in studies on the Asian population and including septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weekend admission does not have an adverse impact on mortality rates of sepsis and septic shock patients. Results must be interpreted with caution owing to high interstudy heterogeneity and variation in confounders adjusted by individual studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"91-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231189887\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231189887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危重病人周末入院是否与较高的死亡率有关一直存在争议。本综述旨在通过比较周末与平日入院患者的死亡率,具体评估败血症和脓毒性休克患者的这一影响:方法:对截至 2023 年 2 月 20 日的 PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 进行了检索,并对 Google Scholar 的灰色文献进行了额外检索:结果:9 项研究符合条件。对所有九项研究的 1,134,417 名患者数据进行的 Meta 分析表明,与工作日相比,周末入院的脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的死亡率并不更高(OR:1.04;95% CI:1.00, 1.09;P = 0.05;I2 = 93%)。根据样本量进行分组分析(大于 2000 或结论:周末入院不会产生不良影响:周末入院不会对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率产生不利影响。由于研究间的高度异质性和各研究调整的混杂因素的差异,在解释结果时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of weekend admission on mortality risk in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: There is an ongoing debate if weekend admissions of critically ill patients are associated with higher mortality rates. The current review aimed to specifically assess this effect in sepsis and septic shock patients by comparing mortality rates with weekend versus weekday admissions.

Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 20th February 2023 with an additional search of Google Scholar for gray literature.

Results: Nine studies were eligible. Meta-analysis of all nine studies with data from 1,134,417 patients demonstrated that sepsis or septic shock patients admitted on weekends don't have higher mortality as compared to those admitted on weekdays (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.09; p = 0.05; I2 = 93%). On subgroup analysis based on sample size (>2000 or <2000 patients) and timing of mortality, we noted no difference in the significance of the results. However, there was a small significant increased risk of mortality with weekend admission noted in studies on the Asian population and including septic shock patients.

Conclusion: Weekend admission does not have an adverse impact on mortality rates of sepsis and septic shock patients. Results must be interpreted with caution owing to high interstudy heterogeneity and variation in confounders adjusted by individual studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. The state of robotic surgery in Spain: Results of a national survey on robotic surgery. Ribosome-binding protein-1 (RRBP1) expression in prostate carcinomas and its relationship with clinicopathological prognostic factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1