{"title":"传统血液透析中模拟与报道的磷酸盐去除以及模拟与透析后血清磷酸盐水平的比较。","authors":"John T Daugirdas","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared predictions of phosphate removal by a 2-pool kinetic model with measured phosphate removal in spent dialysate as reported by others.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six studies were identified that reported phosphate removal in 35 groups of patients. In almost all studies, patients were dialyzed for close to 4 h (range 3 to 6 h). For each study, group mean values of predialysis serum phosphate, body size, dialyzer K<sub>0</sub> A urea, blood and dialysate flow rates, and session lengths were input into the kinetic model. Predictions of group mean phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate were compared with reported measured values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (by patient group) predicted phosphate removal was 931 ± 170 mg/treatment, somewhat higher (p < 0.001) than the reported measured value, 900 mg ± 287. The ratio of predicted/measured removal averaged 1.15 ± 0.427. In 5/35 patient groups (3/26 studies) the predicted/measured phosphate removal was greater than 1.50. If these groups were excluded, the mean measured phosphate removal was 990 mg versus 966 predicted, with a ratio of predicted/measured removal averaging 0.993. Measured group mean postdialysis serum phosphate values (reported in 25/35) were 2.64 ± 0.54, not significantly different from predicted (2.60 ± 0.24 mg/dl, p = NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For conventional 4-h dialysis treatments, phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate values predicted by a 2-pool kinetic model are similar to reported measured values.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":"36 4","pages":"337-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of modeled versus reported phosphate removal and modeled versus postdialysis serum phosphate levels in conventional hemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"John T Daugirdas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sdi.13112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared predictions of phosphate removal by a 2-pool kinetic model with measured phosphate removal in spent dialysate as reported by others.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six studies were identified that reported phosphate removal in 35 groups of patients. In almost all studies, patients were dialyzed for close to 4 h (range 3 to 6 h). For each study, group mean values of predialysis serum phosphate, body size, dialyzer K<sub>0</sub> A urea, blood and dialysate flow rates, and session lengths were input into the kinetic model. Predictions of group mean phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate were compared with reported measured values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (by patient group) predicted phosphate removal was 931 ± 170 mg/treatment, somewhat higher (p < 0.001) than the reported measured value, 900 mg ± 287. The ratio of predicted/measured removal averaged 1.15 ± 0.427. In 5/35 patient groups (3/26 studies) the predicted/measured phosphate removal was greater than 1.50. If these groups were excluded, the mean measured phosphate removal was 990 mg versus 966 predicted, with a ratio of predicted/measured removal averaging 0.993. Measured group mean postdialysis serum phosphate values (reported in 25/35) were 2.64 ± 0.54, not significantly different from predicted (2.60 ± 0.24 mg/dl, p = NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For conventional 4-h dialysis treatments, phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate values predicted by a 2-pool kinetic model are similar to reported measured values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"337-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of modeled versus reported phosphate removal and modeled versus postdialysis serum phosphate levels in conventional hemodialysis.
Background: We compared predictions of phosphate removal by a 2-pool kinetic model with measured phosphate removal in spent dialysate as reported by others.
Methods: Twenty-six studies were identified that reported phosphate removal in 35 groups of patients. In almost all studies, patients were dialyzed for close to 4 h (range 3 to 6 h). For each study, group mean values of predialysis serum phosphate, body size, dialyzer K0 A urea, blood and dialysate flow rates, and session lengths were input into the kinetic model. Predictions of group mean phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate were compared with reported measured values.
Results: Mean (by patient group) predicted phosphate removal was 931 ± 170 mg/treatment, somewhat higher (p < 0.001) than the reported measured value, 900 mg ± 287. The ratio of predicted/measured removal averaged 1.15 ± 0.427. In 5/35 patient groups (3/26 studies) the predicted/measured phosphate removal was greater than 1.50. If these groups were excluded, the mean measured phosphate removal was 990 mg versus 966 predicted, with a ratio of predicted/measured removal averaging 0.993. Measured group mean postdialysis serum phosphate values (reported in 25/35) were 2.64 ± 0.54, not significantly different from predicted (2.60 ± 0.24 mg/dl, p = NS).
Conclusions: For conventional 4-h dialysis treatments, phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate values predicted by a 2-pool kinetic model are similar to reported measured values.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current:
-Fellows Forum
-Dialysis rounds
-Editorials
-Opinions
-Briefly noted
-Summary and Comment
-Guest Edited Issues
-Special Articles
Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide.
Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.