导管消融后房颤复发与右束分支阻滞或室内传导延迟的关系

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI:10.1111/anec.13083
Sung Ho Lee MD, PhD, Ji-Hoon Choi MD, Seung-Jung Park MD, PhD, Kyoung-Min Park MD, PhD, June Soo Kim MD, PhD, Young Keun On MD, PhD
{"title":"导管消融后房颤复发与右束分支阻滞或室内传导延迟的关系","authors":"Sung Ho Lee MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ji-Hoon Choi MD,&nbsp;Seung-Jung Park MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kyoung-Min Park MD, PhD,&nbsp;June Soo Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Young Keun On MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/anec.13083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The association between bundle branch block (BBB) and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether AF combined with BBB is associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 477 consecutive AF patients who underwent catheter ablation were included. The AF patients were divided into three groups according to BBB: AF without BBB (<i>n</i> = 427), AF with right bundle branch block (AF with RBBB) (<i>n</i> = 16), and AF with intraventricular conduction delay (AF with IVCD) (<i>n</i> = 34).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 477 AF patients (mean age 57 years, 81% men, median CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 1), 16 (3.4%) patients had RBBB, and 34 (7.1%) patients had IVCD. During a mean follow-up of 15.2 ± 6.7 months, 119 patients (24.9%) had recurrence of AF. Of these, 111 (26%) patients were in the AF without BBB group, with 2 (12.5%) and 6 (17.6%) patients in the RBBB and IVCD groups, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the rate of recurrent AF was not significantly different among the three groups (<i>p</i> = .39). Multivariable analysis showed that persistent AF (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.15–2.50, <i>p</i> = .007), chronic kidney disease (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.20–7.17, <i>p</i> = .01), and left atrial diameter (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.009–1.082, <i>p</i> = .01) were significantly associated with AF recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AF with BBB was not significantly associated with the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in middle-aged patients with low-risk cardiovascular profile.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.13083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of right bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation\",\"authors\":\"Sung Ho Lee MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ji-Hoon Choi MD,&nbsp;Seung-Jung Park MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kyoung-Min Park MD, PhD,&nbsp;June Soo Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Young Keun On MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anec.13083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The association between bundle branch block (BBB) and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether AF combined with BBB is associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 477 consecutive AF patients who underwent catheter ablation were included. The AF patients were divided into three groups according to BBB: AF without BBB (<i>n</i> = 427), AF with right bundle branch block (AF with RBBB) (<i>n</i> = 16), and AF with intraventricular conduction delay (AF with IVCD) (<i>n</i> = 34).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 477 AF patients (mean age 57 years, 81% men, median CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 1), 16 (3.4%) patients had RBBB, and 34 (7.1%) patients had IVCD. During a mean follow-up of 15.2 ± 6.7 months, 119 patients (24.9%) had recurrence of AF. Of these, 111 (26%) patients were in the AF without BBB group, with 2 (12.5%) and 6 (17.6%) patients in the RBBB and IVCD groups, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the rate of recurrent AF was not significantly different among the three groups (<i>p</i> = .39). Multivariable analysis showed that persistent AF (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.15–2.50, <i>p</i> = .007), chronic kidney disease (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.20–7.17, <i>p</i> = .01), and left atrial diameter (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.009–1.082, <i>p</i> = .01) were significantly associated with AF recurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>AF with BBB was not significantly associated with the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in middle-aged patients with low-risk cardiovascular profile.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.13083\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.13083\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.13083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:束支阻滞(BBB)与导管消融后房颤(AF)复发的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定房颤合并血脑屏障是否与导管消融后房颤复发有关。方法连续477例房颤患者行导管消融治疗。根据血脑屏障情况将房颤患者分为3组:无血脑屏障房颤(n = 427)、右束支阻滞房颤(n = 16)、室内传导延迟房颤(n = 34)。结果477例房颤患者(平均年龄57岁,81%为男性,CHA2DS2-VASc中位评分为1),16例(3.4%)患者有RBBB, 34例(7.1%)患者有IVCD。在平均15.2±6.7个月的随访中,有119例(24.9%)患者发生房颤复发,其中无血凝血组111例(26%),RBBB组2例(12.5%),IVCD组6例(17.6%)。Kaplan-Meier估计的房颤复发率在三组间无显著差异(p = 0.39)。多变量分析显示,持续性房颤(HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.15-2.50, p = 0.007)、慢性肾脏疾病(HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.20-7.17, p = 0.01)和左房内径(HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.009-1.082, p = 0.01)与房颤复发显著相关。结论中年低危心血管患者房颤伴血脑梗死与房颤消融后复发无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of right bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Background

The association between bundle branch block (BBB) and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether AF combined with BBB is associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Methods

A total of 477 consecutive AF patients who underwent catheter ablation were included. The AF patients were divided into three groups according to BBB: AF without BBB (n = 427), AF with right bundle branch block (AF with RBBB) (n = 16), and AF with intraventricular conduction delay (AF with IVCD) (n = 34).

Results

Of the 477 AF patients (mean age 57 years, 81% men, median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1), 16 (3.4%) patients had RBBB, and 34 (7.1%) patients had IVCD. During a mean follow-up of 15.2 ± 6.7 months, 119 patients (24.9%) had recurrence of AF. Of these, 111 (26%) patients were in the AF without BBB group, with 2 (12.5%) and 6 (17.6%) patients in the RBBB and IVCD groups, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the rate of recurrent AF was not significantly different among the three groups (p = .39). Multivariable analysis showed that persistent AF (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.15–2.50, p = .007), chronic kidney disease (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.20–7.17, p = .01), and left atrial diameter (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.009–1.082, p = .01) were significantly associated with AF recurrence.

Conclusion

AF with BBB was not significantly associated with the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in middle-aged patients with low-risk cardiovascular profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation. ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Different Insulin Resistance Indices and Heart Failure in US Adults With Diabetes Mellitus Coronary Angiographic Features of de Winter Syndrome: More Than Just Occlusion of the Left Anterior Descending Artery Intracardiac Echocardiography and Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Dextrocardia Introducing a Novel Pacemaker-Mediated Arrhythmia: The Pseudo-RNRVAS Arising From Atrial Capture Challenges. Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Premature Contractions Originating From RVOT With Interruption of the Inferior Vena Cava-A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1