{"title":"不孕夫妇的三级护理:刚果民主共和国基桑加尼的病因诊断和常规治疗结果。","authors":"Jean-Didier Bosenge-Nguma, Antoine Modia O'yandjo, Juakali Sihalikyolo, Noël Labama Otuli, Kadima Ntokamunda, Batina Agasa, Katenga Bosunga","doi":"10.1186/s40834-023-00236-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In sub-Saharan Africa, tubal factors are described as the main aetiological factors of infertility. Under these conditions, medically assisted procreation is particularly indicated. However, Assisted Reproductive Technology centres are less available. Thus, infertile couples are quickly oriented towards available alternative conventional treatments. The present study aimed to determine the aetiological factors of infertility, the outcomes of the therapeutic options offered, and the factors associated with the success of conventional treatment among infertile couples seeking tertiary care in Kisangani.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at two tertiary health facilities in Kisangani. Infertile couples who provided consent underwent specific examinations necessary for the exploration of infertility and were treated and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The therapeutic options that were offered were expectant attitude, medical treatment, surgical treatment or transfer to an in vitro fertilization unit. The pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 272 infertile couples underwent specific examinations, were treated and were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Many determinant causes were mostly linked to wives rather than husbands. Overall, only 34 women among 211 who were treated became pregnant during the follow-up period; 61 couples were advised to resort to IVF or adoption, but the couples for whom expectant the attitude was indicated immediately rejected it. The patients who therapeutically succeeded at the end of the treatment were those who were younger than 35 years (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.06-4.87; P = 0.017), had a duration of infertility of less than five years (OR = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.79-20.69; P = 0.001) and had secondary infertility (OR = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.79-20.69; P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kisangani faces a major issue in the treatment of infertility. Treatment of patients using conventional methods is limited by the predominance of tubal factors as aetiological determinants of infertility. The low pregnancy rate found in this study provided additional evidence of this. This paper represents a serious plea to national policy-makers to encourage them to pay attention to issues surrounding infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tertiary care for infertile couples: aetiological diagnoses and conventional treatment outcomes in Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Didier Bosenge-Nguma, Antoine Modia O'yandjo, Juakali Sihalikyolo, Noël Labama Otuli, Kadima Ntokamunda, Batina Agasa, Katenga Bosunga\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-023-00236-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In sub-Saharan Africa, tubal factors are described as the main aetiological factors of infertility. Under these conditions, medically assisted procreation is particularly indicated. However, Assisted Reproductive Technology centres are less available. Thus, infertile couples are quickly oriented towards available alternative conventional treatments. The present study aimed to determine the aetiological factors of infertility, the outcomes of the therapeutic options offered, and the factors associated with the success of conventional treatment among infertile couples seeking tertiary care in Kisangani.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at two tertiary health facilities in Kisangani. Infertile couples who provided consent underwent specific examinations necessary for the exploration of infertility and were treated and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The therapeutic options that were offered were expectant attitude, medical treatment, surgical treatment or transfer to an in vitro fertilization unit. The pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 272 infertile couples underwent specific examinations, were treated and were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Many determinant causes were mostly linked to wives rather than husbands. Overall, only 34 women among 211 who were treated became pregnant during the follow-up period; 61 couples were advised to resort to IVF or adoption, but the couples for whom expectant the attitude was indicated immediately rejected it. The patients who therapeutically succeeded at the end of the treatment were those who were younger than 35 years (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.06-4.87; P = 0.017), had a duration of infertility of less than five years (OR = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.79-20.69; P = 0.001) and had secondary infertility (OR = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.79-20.69; P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kisangani faces a major issue in the treatment of infertility. Treatment of patients using conventional methods is limited by the predominance of tubal factors as aetiological determinants of infertility. The low pregnancy rate found in this study provided additional evidence of this. This paper represents a serious plea to national policy-makers to encourage them to pay attention to issues surrounding infertility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00236-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00236-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tertiary care for infertile couples: aetiological diagnoses and conventional treatment outcomes in Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, tubal factors are described as the main aetiological factors of infertility. Under these conditions, medically assisted procreation is particularly indicated. However, Assisted Reproductive Technology centres are less available. Thus, infertile couples are quickly oriented towards available alternative conventional treatments. The present study aimed to determine the aetiological factors of infertility, the outcomes of the therapeutic options offered, and the factors associated with the success of conventional treatment among infertile couples seeking tertiary care in Kisangani.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two tertiary health facilities in Kisangani. Infertile couples who provided consent underwent specific examinations necessary for the exploration of infertility and were treated and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The therapeutic options that were offered were expectant attitude, medical treatment, surgical treatment or transfer to an in vitro fertilization unit. The pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasound.
Results: A total of 272 infertile couples underwent specific examinations, were treated and were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Many determinant causes were mostly linked to wives rather than husbands. Overall, only 34 women among 211 who were treated became pregnant during the follow-up period; 61 couples were advised to resort to IVF or adoption, but the couples for whom expectant the attitude was indicated immediately rejected it. The patients who therapeutically succeeded at the end of the treatment were those who were younger than 35 years (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.06-4.87; P = 0.017), had a duration of infertility of less than five years (OR = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.79-20.69; P = 0.001) and had secondary infertility (OR = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.79-20.69; P = 0.001).
Conclusion: Kisangani faces a major issue in the treatment of infertility. Treatment of patients using conventional methods is limited by the predominance of tubal factors as aetiological determinants of infertility. The low pregnancy rate found in this study provided additional evidence of this. This paper represents a serious plea to national policy-makers to encourage them to pay attention to issues surrounding infertility.