通过参与性行动研究,在治疗后幸存者护理中赋予癌症幸存者权力。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Oncology nursing forum Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1188/23.ONF.563-575
Kelly Filchner, Rick Zoucha, Joan Such Lockhart, Crystal S Denlinger
{"title":"通过参与性行动研究,在治疗后幸存者护理中赋予癌症幸存者权力。","authors":"Kelly Filchner,&nbsp;Rick Zoucha,&nbsp;Joan Such Lockhart,&nbsp;Crystal S Denlinger","doi":"10.1188/23.ONF.563-575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the experiences of lung cancer survivors (LCSs) and their informal and professional caregivers with post-treatment care and to empower them to implement action-based study findings.</p><p><strong>Participants & setting: </strong>Participants were recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling from patients at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in the northeastern United States.</p><p><strong>Methodologic approach: </strong>This study used a participatory action research (PAR) four-phase design. Phase 1 was a focused ethnography; phase 2 consisted of a core group of participants deciding on an action, which was implemented in phase 3; and phase 4 consisted of an evaluation of the action.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The study found 28 categories, eight patterns, and three themes. The themes were the need for resources and education, involvement in mentoring and advocacy, and the value of living versus surviving. The action was creating two flyers focused on resources and advocacy for post-treatment support for LCSs. All participants agreed with the themes and action. Tobacco management and smoking-related stigma for LCSs were the only topics of dissent.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Oncology nurses can use PAR to empower survivors in their post-treatment care. Future PAR cycles should focus on creating support groups and alleviating stigma for LCSs and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"50 5","pages":"563-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering Lung Cancer Survivors in Post-Treatment Survivorship Care Using Participatory Action Research.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Filchner,&nbsp;Rick Zoucha,&nbsp;Joan Such Lockhart,&nbsp;Crystal S Denlinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1188/23.ONF.563-575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the experiences of lung cancer survivors (LCSs) and their informal and professional caregivers with post-treatment care and to empower them to implement action-based study findings.</p><p><strong>Participants & setting: </strong>Participants were recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling from patients at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in the northeastern United States.</p><p><strong>Methodologic approach: </strong>This study used a participatory action research (PAR) four-phase design. Phase 1 was a focused ethnography; phase 2 consisted of a core group of participants deciding on an action, which was implemented in phase 3; and phase 4 consisted of an evaluation of the action.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The study found 28 categories, eight patterns, and three themes. The themes were the need for resources and education, involvement in mentoring and advocacy, and the value of living versus surviving. The action was creating two flyers focused on resources and advocacy for post-treatment support for LCSs. All participants agreed with the themes and action. Tobacco management and smoking-related stigma for LCSs were the only topics of dissent.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Oncology nurses can use PAR to empower survivors in their post-treatment care. Future PAR cycles should focus on creating support groups and alleviating stigma for LCSs and their caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"563-575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.563-575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.563-575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨癌症幸存者(LCS)及其非正式和专业护理人员在治疗后护理方面的经验,并使他们能够实施基于行动的研究结果。参与者和设置:参与者是通过有目的和滚雪式抽样从美国东北部国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心的患者中招募的。方法学方法:本研究采用参与性行动研究(标准杆数)四阶段设计。第一阶段是重点民族志;第二阶段由一个核心参与者小组组成,决定在第三阶段实施的行动;第4阶段包括对行动的评估。研究结果:该研究发现了28个类别、8种模式和3个主题。主题是需要资源和教育、参与辅导和宣传以及生活与生存的价值。该行动制作了两份传单,重点介绍了为LCS提供治疗后支持的资源和宣传。所有与会者都同意这些主题和行动。烟草管理和与吸烟有关的LCS污名化是唯一的异议话题。对护理的影响:肿瘤科护士可以使用标准杆数来增强幸存者的治疗后护理能力。未来的标准杆数周期应侧重于创建支持团体,减轻LCS及其护理人员的耻辱感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empowering Lung Cancer Survivors in Post-Treatment Survivorship Care Using Participatory Action Research.

Purpose: To explore the experiences of lung cancer survivors (LCSs) and their informal and professional caregivers with post-treatment care and to empower them to implement action-based study findings.

Participants & setting: Participants were recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling from patients at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in the northeastern United States.

Methodologic approach: This study used a participatory action research (PAR) four-phase design. Phase 1 was a focused ethnography; phase 2 consisted of a core group of participants deciding on an action, which was implemented in phase 3; and phase 4 consisted of an evaluation of the action.

Findings: The study found 28 categories, eight patterns, and three themes. The themes were the need for resources and education, involvement in mentoring and advocacy, and the value of living versus surviving. The action was creating two flyers focused on resources and advocacy for post-treatment support for LCSs. All participants agreed with the themes and action. Tobacco management and smoking-related stigma for LCSs were the only topics of dissent.

Implications for nursing: Oncology nurses can use PAR to empower survivors in their post-treatment care. Future PAR cycles should focus on creating support groups and alleviating stigma for LCSs and their caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Surveillance Mammography Adherence in Korean Breast Cancer Survivors. Build Bridges, Not Walls: A Call for Collaboration in Oncology With PhD and DNP Colleagues to Improve Research. Expectancy Effect of Acupuncture on Cancer-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Exploring Caregiver Burden and Related Factors Among Primary Caregivers of Patients With Cancer in Taiwan. Feasibility Study of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Treatment-Related Sequelae, and Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1