Mohamed Ayoub, Peter Tajti, Miroslaw Ferenc, Ibrahim Akin, Michael Behnes, Franz-Josef Neumann, Kambis Mashayekhi
{"title":"Rotapro系统治疗严重钙化冠状动脉病变的可行性和结果:Rotapro研究。","authors":"Mohamed Ayoub, Peter Tajti, Miroslaw Ferenc, Ibrahim Akin, Michael Behnes, Franz-Josef Neumann, Kambis Mashayekhi","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Rotapro study was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new Rotapro rotational atherectomy system (RAS) for lesion preparation in calcified coronary artery stenosis. Methods Between 2015 and 2019 consecutive patients undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) with the new Rotapro system and the conventional rotablator (Rotablator) were included from the Bad Krozingen Rotablation Registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral event (MACCE) rate. Results Rotablation was performed in 3.6% of all patients (n = 597) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Procedural outcomes were compared according to the applied RAS (n = 246 Rotapro vs. n = 351 Rotablator). Overall technical success was achieved in 98.3% of patients. The primary endpoint of in-hospital MACCE was comparable between the Rotapro- and the Rotablator-group (3.7% vs. 5.7%, respectively, p = 0.254). The Rotapro group was associated with significant reductions of fluoroscopy time (30 vs. 38 min, p < 0.0001), procedural time (82.5 vs. 96 min, p = 0.0003), applied contrast volume (210 vs. 290 mL, p < 0.0001) and radiation dose (6129 vs. 9827 cGy*cm2, p < 0.0001) compared to the Rotablator group. Conclusions The present study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the new Rotapro system. Inhospital MACCE rates were comparable between both RAS, whereas Rotapro was associated with less fluoroscopy time, radiation dose as well as contrast use.","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"526-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/5d/cardj-30-4-526.PMC10508079.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and outcome of the Rotapro system in treating severely calcified coronary lesions: The Rotapro study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ayoub, Peter Tajti, Miroslaw Ferenc, Ibrahim Akin, Michael Behnes, Franz-Josef Neumann, Kambis Mashayekhi\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The Rotapro study was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new Rotapro rotational atherectomy system (RAS) for lesion preparation in calcified coronary artery stenosis. Methods Between 2015 and 2019 consecutive patients undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) with the new Rotapro system and the conventional rotablator (Rotablator) were included from the Bad Krozingen Rotablation Registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral event (MACCE) rate. Results Rotablation was performed in 3.6% of all patients (n = 597) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Procedural outcomes were compared according to the applied RAS (n = 246 Rotapro vs. n = 351 Rotablator). Overall technical success was achieved in 98.3% of patients. The primary endpoint of in-hospital MACCE was comparable between the Rotapro- and the Rotablator-group (3.7% vs. 5.7%, respectively, p = 0.254). The Rotapro group was associated with significant reductions of fluoroscopy time (30 vs. 38 min, p < 0.0001), procedural time (82.5 vs. 96 min, p = 0.0003), applied contrast volume (210 vs. 290 mL, p < 0.0001) and radiation dose (6129 vs. 9827 cGy*cm2, p < 0.0001) compared to the Rotablator group. Conclusions The present study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the new Rotapro system. Inhospital MACCE rates were comparable between both RAS, whereas Rotapro was associated with less fluoroscopy time, radiation dose as well as contrast use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"526-533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/5d/cardj-30-4-526.PMC10508079.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility and outcome of the Rotapro system in treating severely calcified coronary lesions: The Rotapro study.
Background The Rotapro study was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new Rotapro rotational atherectomy system (RAS) for lesion preparation in calcified coronary artery stenosis. Methods Between 2015 and 2019 consecutive patients undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) with the new Rotapro system and the conventional rotablator (Rotablator) were included from the Bad Krozingen Rotablation Registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral event (MACCE) rate. Results Rotablation was performed in 3.6% of all patients (n = 597) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Procedural outcomes were compared according to the applied RAS (n = 246 Rotapro vs. n = 351 Rotablator). Overall technical success was achieved in 98.3% of patients. The primary endpoint of in-hospital MACCE was comparable between the Rotapro- and the Rotablator-group (3.7% vs. 5.7%, respectively, p = 0.254). The Rotapro group was associated with significant reductions of fluoroscopy time (30 vs. 38 min, p < 0.0001), procedural time (82.5 vs. 96 min, p = 0.0003), applied contrast volume (210 vs. 290 mL, p < 0.0001) and radiation dose (6129 vs. 9827 cGy*cm2, p < 0.0001) compared to the Rotablator group. Conclusions The present study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the new Rotapro system. Inhospital MACCE rates were comparable between both RAS, whereas Rotapro was associated with less fluoroscopy time, radiation dose as well as contrast use.
期刊介绍:
Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community.
Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.