糖尿病慢性肢体威胁性缺血的血运重建选择:来自最近两项试验的启示

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1177/15347346231188874
Jaime H X Lin, Nikolaos Papanas, Hany Zayed, Prashanth R J Vas
{"title":"糖尿病慢性肢体威胁性缺血的血运重建选择:来自最近两项试验的启示","authors":"Jaime H X Lin, Nikolaos Papanas, Hany Zayed, Prashanth R J Vas","doi":"10.1177/15347346231188874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with an increased risk of amputation, mortality, and significantly impaired quality of life. International guidelines recommend considering timely revascularisation and optimal medical therapy to improve limb perfusion in individuals with CLTI. The 2 primary revascularization approaches for CLTI are open bypass surgery (BS) and endovascular therapy (EV), however, there is currently no consensus on the best initial treatment strategy for CLTI, leading to uncertainty among clinicians. To shed light on this issue, 2 recent trials, namely best endovascular versus best surgical therapy in patients with CLI (BEST-CLI) and bypass versus angioplasty for severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL-2), have tried to provide valuable insights. While a definitive conclusion on the optimal revascularisation approach is still pending, these trials offer immediate and clinically relevant information to the diabetic foot multidisciplinary team. The trials encompassed a distinct range of patient cohorts and included participants with varying degrees of medical and physical frailty. Taken together, their findings, highlight the need for an individualised revascularisation strategy which accounts for underlying comorbidities, risk factors, disease severity, availability of suitable bypass conduits, surgical risks, and timely access to procedures. Regardless of the chosen strategy, early referral of patients with diabetes and CLTI to a specialist team within a multidisciplinary environment is crucial. Comprehensive care should encompass essential elements such as adequate debridement, infection control, offloading, glycaemic control, smoking cessation, and patient education. By addressing these aspects, healthcare providers can optimise the management and outcomes for individuals with CLTI and diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revascularisation Options for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Diabetes: Implications From Two Recent Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jaime H X Lin, Nikolaos Papanas, Hany Zayed, Prashanth R J Vas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346231188874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with an increased risk of amputation, mortality, and significantly impaired quality of life. International guidelines recommend considering timely revascularisation and optimal medical therapy to improve limb perfusion in individuals with CLTI. The 2 primary revascularization approaches for CLTI are open bypass surgery (BS) and endovascular therapy (EV), however, there is currently no consensus on the best initial treatment strategy for CLTI, leading to uncertainty among clinicians. To shed light on this issue, 2 recent trials, namely best endovascular versus best surgical therapy in patients with CLI (BEST-CLI) and bypass versus angioplasty for severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL-2), have tried to provide valuable insights. While a definitive conclusion on the optimal revascularisation approach is still pending, these trials offer immediate and clinically relevant information to the diabetic foot multidisciplinary team. The trials encompassed a distinct range of patient cohorts and included participants with varying degrees of medical and physical frailty. Taken together, their findings, highlight the need for an individualised revascularisation strategy which accounts for underlying comorbidities, risk factors, disease severity, availability of suitable bypass conduits, surgical risks, and timely access to procedures. Regardless of the chosen strategy, early referral of patients with diabetes and CLTI to a specialist team within a multidisciplinary environment is crucial. Comprehensive care should encompass essential elements such as adequate debridement, infection control, offloading, glycaemic control, smoking cessation, and patient education. By addressing these aspects, healthcare providers can optimise the management and outcomes for individuals with CLTI and diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231188874\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231188874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的一种严重形式,与截肢、死亡率和生活质量显著下降的风险增加有关。国际指南建议考虑及时血运重建和最佳药物治疗,以改善CLTI患者的肢体灌注。CLTI的两种主要血运重建方法是开放搭桥手术(BS)和血管内治疗(EV),然而,目前对CLTI的最佳初始治疗策略尚无共识,导致临床医生存在不确定性。为了阐明这一问题,最近的两项试验,即对CLI患者的最佳血管内治疗与最佳手术治疗(best -CLI),以及对腿部严重缺血的搭桥与血管成形术(BASIL-2),试图提供有价值的见解。虽然关于最佳血运重建方法的明确结论仍然悬而未决,但这些试验为糖尿病足多学科团队提供了即时和临床相关的信息。这些试验包括一系列不同的患者队列,包括不同程度的医疗和身体虚弱的参与者。综上所述,他们的发现强调了个体化血运重建策略的必要性,该策略考虑了潜在的合并症、风险因素、疾病严重程度、合适的旁路导管的可用性、手术风险和及时获得手术。无论选择何种策略,糖尿病和CLTI患者的早期转诊到多学科环境下的专家团队是至关重要的。综合护理应包括充分的清创、感染控制、卸药、血糖控制、戒烟和患者教育等基本要素。通过解决这些问题,医疗保健提供者可以优化CLTI和糖尿病患者的管理和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revascularisation Options for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Diabetes: Implications From Two Recent Trials.

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with an increased risk of amputation, mortality, and significantly impaired quality of life. International guidelines recommend considering timely revascularisation and optimal medical therapy to improve limb perfusion in individuals with CLTI. The 2 primary revascularization approaches for CLTI are open bypass surgery (BS) and endovascular therapy (EV), however, there is currently no consensus on the best initial treatment strategy for CLTI, leading to uncertainty among clinicians. To shed light on this issue, 2 recent trials, namely best endovascular versus best surgical therapy in patients with CLI (BEST-CLI) and bypass versus angioplasty for severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL-2), have tried to provide valuable insights. While a definitive conclusion on the optimal revascularisation approach is still pending, these trials offer immediate and clinically relevant information to the diabetic foot multidisciplinary team. The trials encompassed a distinct range of patient cohorts and included participants with varying degrees of medical and physical frailty. Taken together, their findings, highlight the need for an individualised revascularisation strategy which accounts for underlying comorbidities, risk factors, disease severity, availability of suitable bypass conduits, surgical risks, and timely access to procedures. Regardless of the chosen strategy, early referral of patients with diabetes and CLTI to a specialist team within a multidisciplinary environment is crucial. Comprehensive care should encompass essential elements such as adequate debridement, infection control, offloading, glycaemic control, smoking cessation, and patient education. By addressing these aspects, healthcare providers can optimise the management and outcomes for individuals with CLTI and diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features, Inflammatory Markers, and Limb Salvage in Older Adults with Diabetes-Related Foot Infections. Reconstruction of Small-Sized Complex Defect on the Foot Dorsum Without Microsurgery: Intrinsic Adipofascial Flap. Getting a Foothold on Diabetic Foot Disease-Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for Inpatient Diabetic Foot Care: A 17-Year Institutional Review. Should Long-Term Survival in Elderly Patients Presenting with Diabetic Foot Complications Impact Treatment Decision Making? Circular External Fixation as a New Offloading Standard of Treatment in Charcot Neuro-Osteoarthropathy Complicated by Midfoot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot, Prospective Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1