对高收入国家粮食政策小组对当地粮食系统影响的范围审查。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Research Reviews Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1017/S0954422423000173
Stephanie Louise Godrich, Jess Doe, Sarah Goodwin, Laura Alston, Katherine Kent
{"title":"对高收入国家粮食政策小组对当地粮食系统影响的范围审查。","authors":"Stephanie Louise Godrich,&nbsp;Jess Doe,&nbsp;Sarah Goodwin,&nbsp;Laura Alston,&nbsp;Katherine Kent","doi":"10.1017/S0954422423000173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review aimed to explore international evidence on the impact of Food Policy Groups (FPGs) on local food systems, in urban and rural regions of high-income countries. Peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched to identify thirty-one documents published between 2002 and 2022 providing evidence on the impact of FPGs. Activities spanned domains including increasing food equity (e.g. strengthening school meals programmes); increasing knowledge and/or demand for healthy food (e.g. food literacy programmes with children and adults); increasing food access (e.g. enhancing local food procurement); environmental sustainability (e.g. promoting low-waste food items on café menus); economic development (e.g. ensuring local businesses are not outperformed by large food distributors); and increasing food system resiliency (e.g. establishment of local produce schemes). Most FPGs reported conducting activities that positively influenced multiple food system domains and reported activities in urban areas, and to a lesser extent in rural areas. Our study highlighted a range of qualitative and quantitative evaluation strategies used to measure FPGs' impact on local food systems. Our recommendations focus on regular and systematic evaluation and research surrounding the impact of FPG activities, to build the evidence base of their impact. Ideally, evaluation would utilise comprehensive and established tools. We recommend exploring the establishment of FPGs across more regions of high-income countries, particularly rural areas, and forming partnerships between FPGs, local government and universities to maximise implementation and evaluation of activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54703,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of the impact of Food Policy Groups on local food systems in high-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Louise Godrich,&nbsp;Jess Doe,&nbsp;Sarah Goodwin,&nbsp;Laura Alston,&nbsp;Katherine Kent\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0954422423000173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This scoping review aimed to explore international evidence on the impact of Food Policy Groups (FPGs) on local food systems, in urban and rural regions of high-income countries. Peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched to identify thirty-one documents published between 2002 and 2022 providing evidence on the impact of FPGs. Activities spanned domains including increasing food equity (e.g. strengthening school meals programmes); increasing knowledge and/or demand for healthy food (e.g. food literacy programmes with children and adults); increasing food access (e.g. enhancing local food procurement); environmental sustainability (e.g. promoting low-waste food items on café menus); economic development (e.g. ensuring local businesses are not outperformed by large food distributors); and increasing food system resiliency (e.g. establishment of local produce schemes). Most FPGs reported conducting activities that positively influenced multiple food system domains and reported activities in urban areas, and to a lesser extent in rural areas. Our study highlighted a range of qualitative and quantitative evaluation strategies used to measure FPGs' impact on local food systems. Our recommendations focus on regular and systematic evaluation and research surrounding the impact of FPG activities, to build the evidence base of their impact. Ideally, evaluation would utilise comprehensive and established tools. We recommend exploring the establishment of FPGs across more regions of high-income countries, particularly rural areas, and forming partnerships between FPGs, local government and universities to maximise implementation and evaluation of activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Research Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422423000173\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422423000173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项范围界定审查旨在探索高收入国家城市和农村地区粮食政策小组对当地粮食系统影响的国际证据。对同行评审和灰色文献进行了检索,以确定2002年至2022年间发表的三十一份文件,这些文件提供了FPG影响的证据。活动涉及多个领域,包括提高粮食公平(例如加强学校供餐方案);增加对健康食品的知识和/或需求(例如针对儿童和成人的食品扫盲方案);增加粮食供应(例如加强当地粮食采购);环境可持续性(例如在咖啡馆菜单上推广低浪费食品);经济发展(例如,确保当地企业不会被大型食品分销商超越);以及提高粮食系统的弹性(例如建立当地生产计划)。大多数FPG报告称开展的活动对多个粮食系统领域产生了积极影响,并报告了城市地区的活动,农村地区的活动程度较低。我们的研究强调了一系列用于衡量FPG对当地粮食系统影响的定性和定量评估策略。我们的建议侧重于围绕FPG活动的影响进行定期和系统的评估和研究,以建立其影响的证据基础。理想情况下,评估将利用全面和既定的工具。我们建议探索在高收入国家的更多地区,特别是农村地区建立FPG,并在FPG、地方政府和大学之间建立伙伴关系,以最大限度地实施和评估活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A scoping review of the impact of Food Policy Groups on local food systems in high-income countries.

This scoping review aimed to explore international evidence on the impact of Food Policy Groups (FPGs) on local food systems, in urban and rural regions of high-income countries. Peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched to identify thirty-one documents published between 2002 and 2022 providing evidence on the impact of FPGs. Activities spanned domains including increasing food equity (e.g. strengthening school meals programmes); increasing knowledge and/or demand for healthy food (e.g. food literacy programmes with children and adults); increasing food access (e.g. enhancing local food procurement); environmental sustainability (e.g. promoting low-waste food items on café menus); economic development (e.g. ensuring local businesses are not outperformed by large food distributors); and increasing food system resiliency (e.g. establishment of local produce schemes). Most FPGs reported conducting activities that positively influenced multiple food system domains and reported activities in urban areas, and to a lesser extent in rural areas. Our study highlighted a range of qualitative and quantitative evaluation strategies used to measure FPGs' impact on local food systems. Our recommendations focus on regular and systematic evaluation and research surrounding the impact of FPG activities, to build the evidence base of their impact. Ideally, evaluation would utilise comprehensive and established tools. We recommend exploring the establishment of FPGs across more regions of high-income countries, particularly rural areas, and forming partnerships between FPGs, local government and universities to maximise implementation and evaluation of activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research Reviews
Nutrition Research Reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research Reviews offers a comprehensive overview of nutritional science today. By distilling the latest research and linking it to established practice, the journal consistently delivers the widest range of in-depth articles in the field of nutritional science. It presents up-to-date, critical reviews of key topics in nutrition science advancing new concepts and hypotheses that encourage the exchange of fundamental ideas on nutritional well-being in both humans and animals.
期刊最新文献
Military rations: Nutritional, sensorial and technological quality and their effects on military physical exercise in extreme environments. Nutrition and health effects of pectin: A systematic scoping review of human intervention studies. Selenium supplementation in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing haemodialysis: a systematic review of the effects on plasma selenium, antioxidant and inflammatory markers, immunological parameters and thyroid hormones. The influence of zinc levels on osteoarthritis: A comprehensive review. What is the dietary intake and nutritional status of defence members: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1