医学教育中的纸牌和棋盘游戏设计:长度和复杂性考虑。

Michael Joseph Cosimini, Jolene Collins
{"title":"医学教育中的纸牌和棋盘游戏设计:长度和复杂性考虑。","authors":"Michael Joseph Cosimini,&nbsp;Jolene Collins","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2023.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing use of games for health professions education. Card and board games are relatively easy to develop, effective for education, supported by educational theory, and generally well accepted by learners; yet, they remain relatively infrequently described in the medical education literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed to understand barriers to use of card and board games and to understand user preferences to inform their development. The questionnaire was offered to students and educators downloading a printable antibiotic card game online.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 335 health professionals primarily by physicians, pharmacists, and their trainees. Participants described preferences for shorter games and games with lower complexity. Player counts in the two to four range were the most commonly desired. The most frequently cited barriers were lack of availability in desired subjects, cost, and concerns about content accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Educators looking to develop or use serious card and board games should start with shorter, lower-complexity games. Methods to assure and demonstrate content accuracy for educational games should be explored by educators and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"35 3","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/cf/kjme-2023-267.PMC10493406.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Card and board game design for medical education: length and complexity considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Joseph Cosimini,&nbsp;Jolene Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.3946/kjme.2023.267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing use of games for health professions education. Card and board games are relatively easy to develop, effective for education, supported by educational theory, and generally well accepted by learners; yet, they remain relatively infrequently described in the medical education literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed to understand barriers to use of card and board games and to understand user preferences to inform their development. The questionnaire was offered to students and educators downloading a printable antibiotic card game online.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 335 health professionals primarily by physicians, pharmacists, and their trainees. Participants described preferences for shorter games and games with lower complexity. Player counts in the two to four range were the most commonly desired. The most frequently cited barriers were lack of availability in desired subjects, cost, and concerns about content accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Educators looking to develop or use serious card and board games should start with shorter, lower-complexity games. Methods to assure and demonstrate content accuracy for educational games should be explored by educators and researchers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"291-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/cf/kjme-2023-267.PMC10493406.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在卫生专业教育中越来越多地使用游戏。纸牌和棋盘游戏相对容易开发,对教育有效,有教育理论支持,普遍为学习者所接受;然而,在医学教育文献中,它们仍然相对较少被描述。方法:通过问卷调查了解卡牌和棋盘游戏的使用障碍,了解用户偏好,为开发提供信息。调查问卷被提供给学生和教育工作者,他们下载了一个可打印的抗生素纸牌游戏。结果:共有335名卫生专业人员完成问卷调查,问卷主要由医师、药师及其培训生组成。参与者描述了他们对较短游戏和较低复杂性游戏的偏好。玩家数量在2到4之间是最普遍的要求。最常见的障碍是缺乏所需主题的可用性、成本以及对内容准确性的关注。结论:希望开发或使用严肃卡牌和棋盘游戏的教育工作者应该从较短、较低复杂性的游戏开始。如何保证和证明教育游戏内容的准确性,是教育工作者和研究人员应该探讨的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Card and board game design for medical education: length and complexity considerations.

Purpose: There is growing use of games for health professions education. Card and board games are relatively easy to develop, effective for education, supported by educational theory, and generally well accepted by learners; yet, they remain relatively infrequently described in the medical education literature.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed to understand barriers to use of card and board games and to understand user preferences to inform their development. The questionnaire was offered to students and educators downloading a printable antibiotic card game online.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 335 health professionals primarily by physicians, pharmacists, and their trainees. Participants described preferences for shorter games and games with lower complexity. Player counts in the two to four range were the most commonly desired. The most frequently cited barriers were lack of availability in desired subjects, cost, and concerns about content accuracy.

Conclusion: Educators looking to develop or use serious card and board games should start with shorter, lower-complexity games. Methods to assure and demonstrate content accuracy for educational games should be explored by educators and researchers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model. "Hey, can I go home?": a qualitative case study of wellbeing and the work environment in surgical training. Behind the scenes: teachers collaboration to facilitate interprofessional education between medical and pharmacy students in Indonesia. Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement. Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1