Mianne Lee, Adrian C Y Lui, Christopher C Y Mak, Mandy H Y Tsang, Jasmine L F Fung, K S Yeung, Brian Hon Yin Chung
{"title":"嵌合的临床意义:一个大学附属遗传学诊所的83个家庭的10年回顾性审查。","authors":"Mianne Lee, Adrian C Y Lui, Christopher C Y Mak, Mandy H Y Tsang, Jasmine L F Fung, K S Yeung, Brian Hon Yin Chung","doi":"10.1097/MCD.0000000000000418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mosaicism refers to the coexistence of two or more genetically distinct cell populations in an individual from a single fertilized egg. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with mosaic disorders between 2010 and 2021 in a university-affiliated genetics clinic, which attends to territory-wide genetic consultations. All patients with confirmed mosaic diagnoses through reproductive (n = 6), prenatal (n = 24), and postnatal (n = 53) testing were examined. We observed that mosaic 45, X (n = 31) and PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (n = 16) disorders were among the most prevalent diagnoses in the clinic, and the total percentage of patients with mosaicism in our cohort was 2.0% (83/4157). A review of the diagnostic journey highlights the challenge in diagnosing mosaic disorders, whereby 38% of the subjects required more than one test sample, and 52% of the cases required more than one orthogonal method of detection to reach the correct diagnosis. While detection of mosaicism is passive through routine clinical testing, for example karyotyping in reproductive and prenatal care, in postnatal care, clinicians can more actively drive the detection of mosaicism. Therefore, we recommend a low threshold for additional genetic testing in suspected mosaicism for more accurate diagnosis and counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":50682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Dysmorphology","volume":"31 3","pages":"113-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical implications of mosaicism: a 10-year retrospective review of 83 families in a university-affiliated genetics clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Mianne Lee, Adrian C Y Lui, Christopher C Y Mak, Mandy H Y Tsang, Jasmine L F Fung, K S Yeung, Brian Hon Yin Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCD.0000000000000418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mosaicism refers to the coexistence of two or more genetically distinct cell populations in an individual from a single fertilized egg. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with mosaic disorders between 2010 and 2021 in a university-affiliated genetics clinic, which attends to territory-wide genetic consultations. All patients with confirmed mosaic diagnoses through reproductive (n = 6), prenatal (n = 24), and postnatal (n = 53) testing were examined. We observed that mosaic 45, X (n = 31) and PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (n = 16) disorders were among the most prevalent diagnoses in the clinic, and the total percentage of patients with mosaicism in our cohort was 2.0% (83/4157). A review of the diagnostic journey highlights the challenge in diagnosing mosaic disorders, whereby 38% of the subjects required more than one test sample, and 52% of the cases required more than one orthogonal method of detection to reach the correct diagnosis. While detection of mosaicism is passive through routine clinical testing, for example karyotyping in reproductive and prenatal care, in postnatal care, clinicians can more actively drive the detection of mosaicism. Therefore, we recommend a low threshold for additional genetic testing in suspected mosaicism for more accurate diagnosis and counselling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Dysmorphology\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"113-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Dysmorphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCD.0000000000000418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Dysmorphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCD.0000000000000418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical implications of mosaicism: a 10-year retrospective review of 83 families in a university-affiliated genetics clinic.
Mosaicism refers to the coexistence of two or more genetically distinct cell populations in an individual from a single fertilized egg. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with mosaic disorders between 2010 and 2021 in a university-affiliated genetics clinic, which attends to territory-wide genetic consultations. All patients with confirmed mosaic diagnoses through reproductive (n = 6), prenatal (n = 24), and postnatal (n = 53) testing were examined. We observed that mosaic 45, X (n = 31) and PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (n = 16) disorders were among the most prevalent diagnoses in the clinic, and the total percentage of patients with mosaicism in our cohort was 2.0% (83/4157). A review of the diagnostic journey highlights the challenge in diagnosing mosaic disorders, whereby 38% of the subjects required more than one test sample, and 52% of the cases required more than one orthogonal method of detection to reach the correct diagnosis. While detection of mosaicism is passive through routine clinical testing, for example karyotyping in reproductive and prenatal care, in postnatal care, clinicians can more actively drive the detection of mosaicism. Therefore, we recommend a low threshold for additional genetic testing in suspected mosaicism for more accurate diagnosis and counselling.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Dysmorphology publishes succinct case reports on the etiology, clinical delineation, genetic mapping, and molecular embryology of birth defects. This journal covers such topics as multiple congenital anomaly syndromes - with particular emphasis on previously undescribed conditions, rare findings, ethnic differences in existing syndromes, fetal abnormalities, and cytogenetic aberrations that might give clues to the localization of developmental genes. Regular features include original, peer-reviewed articles, conference reports, book and software reviews, abstracts and summaries from the UK Dysmorphology Club, and literature summaries.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors wihtout further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.