肘关节后外侧旋转不稳定的简单通用测试。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS HAND Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1177/15589447231185585
Amanda N Goldin, Kathryn D Dwight, Eric R Hentzen, Bryan T Leek, Jan M Hughes-Austin, Samuel R Ward, Reid A Abrams
{"title":"肘关节后外侧旋转不稳定的简单通用测试。","authors":"Amanda N Goldin, Kathryn D Dwight, Eric R Hentzen, Bryan T Leek, Jan M Hughes-Austin, Samuel R Ward, Reid A Abrams","doi":"10.1177/15589447231185585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) results from lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency. The lateral pivot shift test is used to diagnose PLRI but can be difficult to perform and is poorly tolerated. We present a new maneuver, the Posterior Radiocapitellar Subluxation Test (PRST), that we believe is easier to perform. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and reproducibility of the PRST with the lateral pivot shift test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 10 cadaveric upper extremity specimens, performed a Kocher approach on each, released the LCL origin in 5, then closed. The specimens were randomized, and 3 attending orthopedic surgeons and 1 resident blindly performed the PRST then the lateral pivot shift test after re-randomization and assessed presence or absence of PLRI. This process was repeated the following day. The data for each test were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the blinded testing when comparing PRST with the pivot shift test, overall accuracy was 77.5%, compared with 67.5% (<i>P</i> = .03), sensitivity was 75.0%, compared with 50.0% (<i>P</i> = .003), and specificity was 80.0%, compared with 85.0% (<i>P</i> = .55). <b>Conclusions:</b> The PRST appears to be at least as accurate as the lateral pivot shift test, with comparable intraobserver and interobserver reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simple and Versatile Test for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda N Goldin, Kathryn D Dwight, Eric R Hentzen, Bryan T Leek, Jan M Hughes-Austin, Samuel R Ward, Reid A Abrams\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447231185585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) results from lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency. The lateral pivot shift test is used to diagnose PLRI but can be difficult to perform and is poorly tolerated. We present a new maneuver, the Posterior Radiocapitellar Subluxation Test (PRST), that we believe is easier to perform. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and reproducibility of the PRST with the lateral pivot shift test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 10 cadaveric upper extremity specimens, performed a Kocher approach on each, released the LCL origin in 5, then closed. The specimens were randomized, and 3 attending orthopedic surgeons and 1 resident blindly performed the PRST then the lateral pivot shift test after re-randomization and assessed presence or absence of PLRI. This process was repeated the following day. The data for each test were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the blinded testing when comparing PRST with the pivot shift test, overall accuracy was 77.5%, compared with 67.5% (<i>P</i> = .03), sensitivity was 75.0%, compared with 50.0% (<i>P</i> = .003), and specificity was 80.0%, compared with 85.0% (<i>P</i> = .55). <b>Conclusions:</b> The PRST appears to be at least as accurate as the lateral pivot shift test, with comparable intraobserver and interobserver reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231185585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231185585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:后外侧旋转不稳定(PLRI)是由外侧尺侧副韧带(LCL)缺乏引起的。侧枢轴移位试验用于诊断PLRI,但很难执行且耐受性差。我们提出一种新的操作方法,即肱桡后侧半脱位试验(PRST),我们认为它更容易操作。本研究的目的是比较PRST与侧枢轴移位试验的有效性和可重复性。方法:取10例尸体上肢标本,分别行Kocher入路,5例放开LCL原点,闭合。标本随机化,3名骨科主治医师和1名住院医师盲目进行PRST,再随机化后再进行侧枢轴移位试验,评估是否存在PLRI。第二天又重复了这一过程。对每项试验的数据进行敏感性、特异性和准确性分析。结果:PRST与枢轴移位试验进行盲法比较,总体准确率为77.5%,对67.5% (P = 0.03);敏感性为75.0%,对50.0% (P = 0.003);特异性为80.0%,对85.0% (P = 0.55)。结论:PRST似乎至少与侧枢轴移位测试一样准确,具有相当的观察者内部和观察者之间的信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Simple and Versatile Test for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability.

Background: Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) results from lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency. The lateral pivot shift test is used to diagnose PLRI but can be difficult to perform and is poorly tolerated. We present a new maneuver, the Posterior Radiocapitellar Subluxation Test (PRST), that we believe is easier to perform. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and reproducibility of the PRST with the lateral pivot shift test.

Methods: We obtained 10 cadaveric upper extremity specimens, performed a Kocher approach on each, released the LCL origin in 5, then closed. The specimens were randomized, and 3 attending orthopedic surgeons and 1 resident blindly performed the PRST then the lateral pivot shift test after re-randomization and assessed presence or absence of PLRI. This process was repeated the following day. The data for each test were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results: For the blinded testing when comparing PRST with the pivot shift test, overall accuracy was 77.5%, compared with 67.5% (P = .03), sensitivity was 75.0%, compared with 50.0% (P = .003), and specificity was 80.0%, compared with 85.0% (P = .55). Conclusions: The PRST appears to be at least as accurate as the lateral pivot shift test, with comparable intraobserver and interobserver reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
期刊最新文献
Brief Ectopic Banking and Immediate Plate Fixation With Free Omental Flap Addresses Multiple Fundamental Problems for Single-Stage Replant of Transhumeral Amputation. MRI Analysis of the Wrist: Does the Presence of Palmaris Longus Affect Median Nerve Position? Assessing the Return of Function After Various Approaches to Stable Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures. Concurrent Perioperative Benzodiazepine and Opioid Utilization in Opioid-Naive Patients Undergoing Soft Tissue Hand Surgery. Early Postoperative Outcomes of Surgical Fixation of Proximal Phalanx Fractures With Intramedullary Nails Versus Kirschner Wires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1