Arsalan Tariq, Adam G Stewart, Devang J Desai, Sumudu Britton, Nigel Dunglison, Rachel Esler, Matthew J Roberts
{"title":"尿道周围脓肿的病因、危险因素、治疗方案和结果:系统回顾。","authors":"Arsalan Tariq, Adam G Stewart, Devang J Desai, Sumudu Britton, Nigel Dunglison, Rachel Esler, Matthew J Roberts","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe patterns of presentation, etiology, risk factors, management, and treatment outcomes of periurethral abscesses using a systematic review framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After prospective registration on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020193063), a systematic review of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane scientific databases was performed. Articles published between 1900 and 2021 were considered. Extracted data included symptoms, etiology, medical history, investigations, treatment, and outcomes. Collated data were analyzed using univariate methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria reporting on 270 patients (211 male, 59 female) with periurethral abscess. The most common clinical features were pain (41.5%), pyuria (41.5%), dysuria (38.5%), urinary frequency (32.3%), fever (25%), and a palpable mass (23%). Predisposing risk factors included the presence of a sexually transmitted infection or urinary tract infection (55.0%), urethral strictures (39.6%), and recent urethral instrumentation (18.7%). Management approaches included open incision and drainage (64.3%), conservative management with antibiotics (29.8%), and minimally invasive techniques (needle aspiration, endoscopic drainage). Time trend analysis of etiology revealed a decreased incidence of infection (sexually transmitted infection/urinary tract infection, human immunodeficiency virus) and higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and periurethral bulking injections in recent years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periurethral abscesses may display a wide range of clinical features. Presentation, risk factors and underlying etiology vary with sex. The optimal management technique is guided by abscess size. Open incision and drainage combined with antibiotics continues to be the mainstay of management. However, minimally invasive techniques are gaining favor. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic appraisal and management algorithm for periurethral abscess.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"17 2","pages":"100-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/b2/curr-urol-17-100.PMC10489258.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Periurethral abscess etiology, risk factors, treatment options, and outcomes: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Arsalan Tariq, Adam G Stewart, Devang J Desai, Sumudu Britton, Nigel Dunglison, Rachel Esler, Matthew J Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe patterns of presentation, etiology, risk factors, management, and treatment outcomes of periurethral abscesses using a systematic review framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After prospective registration on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020193063), a systematic review of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane scientific databases was performed. Articles published between 1900 and 2021 were considered. Extracted data included symptoms, etiology, medical history, investigations, treatment, and outcomes. Collated data were analyzed using univariate methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria reporting on 270 patients (211 male, 59 female) with periurethral abscess. The most common clinical features were pain (41.5%), pyuria (41.5%), dysuria (38.5%), urinary frequency (32.3%), fever (25%), and a palpable mass (23%). Predisposing risk factors included the presence of a sexually transmitted infection or urinary tract infection (55.0%), urethral strictures (39.6%), and recent urethral instrumentation (18.7%). Management approaches included open incision and drainage (64.3%), conservative management with antibiotics (29.8%), and minimally invasive techniques (needle aspiration, endoscopic drainage). Time trend analysis of etiology revealed a decreased incidence of infection (sexually transmitted infection/urinary tract infection, human immunodeficiency virus) and higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and periurethral bulking injections in recent years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periurethral abscesses may display a wide range of clinical features. Presentation, risk factors and underlying etiology vary with sex. The optimal management technique is guided by abscess size. Open incision and drainage combined with antibiotics continues to be the mainstay of management. However, minimally invasive techniques are gaining favor. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic appraisal and management algorithm for periurethral abscess.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Urology\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"100-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/b2/curr-urol-17-100.PMC10489258.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在通过系统回顾框架描述尿道周围脓肿的表现、病因、危险因素、管理和治疗结果。材料和方法:在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42020193063)进行前瞻性注册后,对Web of Science、Embase、PubMed和Cochrane科学数据库进行系统综述。论文发表于1900年至2021年。提取的资料包括症状、病因、病史、调查、治疗和结果。整理后的资料采用单变量方法进行分析。结果:60篇符合纳入标准的文章报道了270例尿道周围脓肿患者(男211例,女59例)。最常见的临床特征是疼痛(41.5%)、脓尿(41.5%)、排尿困难(38.5%)、尿频(32.3%)、发热(25%)和可触及肿块(23%)。易感危险因素包括性传播感染或尿路感染(55.0%)、尿道狭窄(39.6%)和近期尿道内固定(18.7%)。治疗方法包括切开引流(64.3%)、抗生素保守治疗(29.8%)和微创技术(针吸、内镜下引流)。病因学时间趋势分析显示,近年来感染(性传播感染/尿路感染、人类免疫缺陷病毒)发生率下降,糖尿病和尿道周围填充注射发生率上升。结论:尿道周围脓肿可能表现出广泛的临床特征。表现、危险因素和潜在病因因性别而异。以脓肿大小为指导进行最佳处理。切开引流联合抗生素仍然是治疗的主要方法。然而,微创技术正在获得青睐。据作者所知,这是第一个对尿道周围脓肿进行系统评价和管理的算法。
Periurethral abscess etiology, risk factors, treatment options, and outcomes: A systematic review.
Objectives: This study aimed to describe patterns of presentation, etiology, risk factors, management, and treatment outcomes of periurethral abscesses using a systematic review framework.
Materials and methods: After prospective registration on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020193063), a systematic review of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane scientific databases was performed. Articles published between 1900 and 2021 were considered. Extracted data included symptoms, etiology, medical history, investigations, treatment, and outcomes. Collated data were analyzed using univariate methods.
Results: Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria reporting on 270 patients (211 male, 59 female) with periurethral abscess. The most common clinical features were pain (41.5%), pyuria (41.5%), dysuria (38.5%), urinary frequency (32.3%), fever (25%), and a palpable mass (23%). Predisposing risk factors included the presence of a sexually transmitted infection or urinary tract infection (55.0%), urethral strictures (39.6%), and recent urethral instrumentation (18.7%). Management approaches included open incision and drainage (64.3%), conservative management with antibiotics (29.8%), and minimally invasive techniques (needle aspiration, endoscopic drainage). Time trend analysis of etiology revealed a decreased incidence of infection (sexually transmitted infection/urinary tract infection, human immunodeficiency virus) and higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and periurethral bulking injections in recent years.
Conclusions: Periurethral abscesses may display a wide range of clinical features. Presentation, risk factors and underlying etiology vary with sex. The optimal management technique is guided by abscess size. Open incision and drainage combined with antibiotics continues to be the mainstay of management. However, minimally invasive techniques are gaining favor. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic appraisal and management algorithm for periurethral abscess.