{"title":"用于定量测量单核细胞 HLA-DR 的全血无溶剂免洗微量法。","authors":"Jordi Miatello, Valérie Faivre, Clémence Marais, Mégane Raineau, Didier Payen, Pierre Tissieres","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Monocyte (m)HLA-DR expression appears to be a potent marker of immunosuppression in critically ill patients. The persistence of low mHLA-DR expression is associated with an increased risk of nosocomial infections and mortality. To adapt this measurement to pediatric requirements and provide extensive 24/7 access, we have developed a whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod (MM) and compared it with the standardized method (SM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>mHLA-DR was quantified by flow cytometry using Quantibrite™ Anti-HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5 with either the SM performed in a diagnostic hematology laboratory using manufacturer protocol, or a whole blood no-lyse no-wash MM using an Attune flow cytometer located in the pediatric ICU. Median fluorescence intensity was measured in both techniques and converted to antibodies per cell (AB/C) calibrated with BD Quantibrite™ PE beads. Blood and Quantibrite™ reagent volume used with the MM was reduced by 5-fold compared to SM. In addition to Quantibrite™ Anti-Human HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5, MM required anti-CD45 and anti-CD19 labeling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We determined the expression of mHLA-DR in 34 patients, 20 adults, and 14 children admitted to ICU. Correlation between MM and SM was excellent (Pearson's correlation: <i>y</i> = 0.8192<i>x</i> + 678.7, <i>r</i> = 0.9270, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The estimated bias was 2467 ± 1.96 × 3307 AB/C; CI 95% [−4016; +8949].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The no-lyse no-wash whole blood microvolume method for measuring mHLA-DR expression allows for simplified sample preparation without compromising accuracy of the data. This method may simplify immune monitoring of critically ill patient by the deployment of a point of care method.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"106 1","pages":"58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod for the quantitative measurement of monocyte HLA-DR\",\"authors\":\"Jordi Miatello, Valérie Faivre, Clémence Marais, Mégane Raineau, Didier Payen, Pierre Tissieres\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cyto.b.22142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Monocyte (m)HLA-DR expression appears to be a potent marker of immunosuppression in critically ill patients. The persistence of low mHLA-DR expression is associated with an increased risk of nosocomial infections and mortality. To adapt this measurement to pediatric requirements and provide extensive 24/7 access, we have developed a whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod (MM) and compared it with the standardized method (SM).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>mHLA-DR was quantified by flow cytometry using Quantibrite™ Anti-HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5 with either the SM performed in a diagnostic hematology laboratory using manufacturer protocol, or a whole blood no-lyse no-wash MM using an Attune flow cytometer located in the pediatric ICU. Median fluorescence intensity was measured in both techniques and converted to antibodies per cell (AB/C) calibrated with BD Quantibrite™ PE beads. Blood and Quantibrite™ reagent volume used with the MM was reduced by 5-fold compared to SM. In addition to Quantibrite™ Anti-Human HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5, MM required anti-CD45 and anti-CD19 labeling.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We determined the expression of mHLA-DR in 34 patients, 20 adults, and 14 children admitted to ICU. Correlation between MM and SM was excellent (Pearson's correlation: <i>y</i> = 0.8192<i>x</i> + 678.7, <i>r</i> = 0.9270, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The estimated bias was 2467 ± 1.96 × 3307 AB/C; CI 95% [−4016; +8949].</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The no-lyse no-wash whole blood microvolume method for measuring mHLA-DR expression allows for simplified sample preparation without compromising accuracy of the data. This method may simplify immune monitoring of critically ill patient by the deployment of a point of care method.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"58-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22142\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22142\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod for the quantitative measurement of monocyte HLA-DR
Background
Monocyte (m)HLA-DR expression appears to be a potent marker of immunosuppression in critically ill patients. The persistence of low mHLA-DR expression is associated with an increased risk of nosocomial infections and mortality. To adapt this measurement to pediatric requirements and provide extensive 24/7 access, we have developed a whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod (MM) and compared it with the standardized method (SM).
Methods
mHLA-DR was quantified by flow cytometry using Quantibrite™ Anti-HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5 with either the SM performed in a diagnostic hematology laboratory using manufacturer protocol, or a whole blood no-lyse no-wash MM using an Attune flow cytometer located in the pediatric ICU. Median fluorescence intensity was measured in both techniques and converted to antibodies per cell (AB/C) calibrated with BD Quantibrite™ PE beads. Blood and Quantibrite™ reagent volume used with the MM was reduced by 5-fold compared to SM. In addition to Quantibrite™ Anti-Human HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5, MM required anti-CD45 and anti-CD19 labeling.
Results
We determined the expression of mHLA-DR in 34 patients, 20 adults, and 14 children admitted to ICU. Correlation between MM and SM was excellent (Pearson's correlation: y = 0.8192x + 678.7, r = 0.9270, p < 0.0001). The estimated bias was 2467 ± 1.96 × 3307 AB/C; CI 95% [−4016; +8949].
Conclusions
The no-lyse no-wash whole blood microvolume method for measuring mHLA-DR expression allows for simplified sample preparation without compromising accuracy of the data. This method may simplify immune monitoring of critically ill patient by the deployment of a point of care method.
期刊介绍:
Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.