How Timid or Bold Are Ministries of Health and Provincial Health Authorities in Canada in Planning for Healthcare Quality?

Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend countries set quality plans for their health systems with clear priorities, indicators and targets. This paper examines whether Canada's federal, provincial and territorial governments are applying these principles.

Methods: We evaluated plans from 2010 to 2019 for 14 ministries of health and four health authorities in provinces with a single authority against a rubric that considered the existence of indicators, baselines, targets, time frames and progress reports.

Results: Ratings ranged from A+ to F with a median B/B-. Most jurisdictions had indicators, but only five of 18 jurisdictions had clear baselines, numeric targets and time frames. Irregularities were observed, such as vague indicators; setting goals to "improve" without targets; announcing targets only after plans had ended; setting minimal targets; removing targets after missing them previously; or inappropriate characterization of progress.

Discussion: Most Canadian governments are reluctant to set quality targets. We speculate there may be fear of criticism if targets are missed. However, several jurisdictions had clear, ambitious plans that may serve as examples for others.