历史临床试验的重新评估支持噬菌体治疗的有效性。

IF 19 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Clinical Microbiology Reviews Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1128/cmr.00062-22
Luigi Marongiu, Markus Burkard, Ulrich M Lauer, Ludwig E Hoelzle, Sascha Venturelli
{"title":"历史临床试验的重新评估支持噬菌体治疗的有效性。","authors":"Luigi Marongiu,&nbsp;Markus Burkard,&nbsp;Ulrich M Lauer,&nbsp;Ludwig E Hoelzle,&nbsp;Sascha Venturelli","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00062-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phage therapy has become a hot topic in medical research due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. In the treatment of bacterial infections, bacteriophages have several advantages over antibiotics, including strain specificity, lack of serious side effects, and low development costs. However, scientists dismissed the clinical success of early clinical trials in the 1940s, slowing the adoption of this promising antibacterial application in Western countries. The current study used statistical methods commonly used in modern meta-analysis to reevaluate early 20th-century studies and compare them with clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years. Using a random effect model, the development of disease after treatment with or without phages was measured in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on the findings of 17 clinical trials conducted between 1921 and 1940, phage therapy was effective (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.44, <i>P</i> value < 0.0001). The current study includes a topic review on modern clinical trials; four could be analyzed, indicating a noneffective therapy (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.53 to 5.27, <i>P</i> value = 0.0009). The results suggest phage therapy was surprisingly less effective than standard treatments in resolving bacterial infections. However, the results were affected by the small sample set size. This work also contextualizes the development of phage therapy in the early 20th century and highlights the expansion of phage applications in the last few years. In conclusion, the current review shows phage therapy is no longer an underestimated tool in the treatment of bacterial infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":"35 4","pages":"e0006222"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769689/pdf/cmr.00062-22.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessment of Historical Clinical Trials Supports the Effectiveness of Phage Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Marongiu,&nbsp;Markus Burkard,&nbsp;Ulrich M Lauer,&nbsp;Ludwig E Hoelzle,&nbsp;Sascha Venturelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/cmr.00062-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Phage therapy has become a hot topic in medical research due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. In the treatment of bacterial infections, bacteriophages have several advantages over antibiotics, including strain specificity, lack of serious side effects, and low development costs. However, scientists dismissed the clinical success of early clinical trials in the 1940s, slowing the adoption of this promising antibacterial application in Western countries. The current study used statistical methods commonly used in modern meta-analysis to reevaluate early 20th-century studies and compare them with clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years. Using a random effect model, the development of disease after treatment with or without phages was measured in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on the findings of 17 clinical trials conducted between 1921 and 1940, phage therapy was effective (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.44, <i>P</i> value < 0.0001). The current study includes a topic review on modern clinical trials; four could be analyzed, indicating a noneffective therapy (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.53 to 5.27, <i>P</i> value = 0.0009). The results suggest phage therapy was surprisingly less effective than standard treatments in resolving bacterial infections. However, the results were affected by the small sample set size. This work also contextualizes the development of phage therapy in the early 20th century and highlights the expansion of phage applications in the last few years. In conclusion, the current review shows phage therapy is no longer an underestimated tool in the treatment of bacterial infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology Reviews\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"e0006222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769689/pdf/cmr.00062-22.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00062-22\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00062-22","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

由于耐药菌株的日益流行,噬菌体治疗已成为医学研究的热点。在治疗细菌感染方面,噬菌体与抗生素相比具有多种优势,包括菌株特异性、没有严重的副作用、开发成本低。然而,科学家们在20世纪40年代早期临床试验的临床成功,减缓了这种有前途的抗菌应用在西方国家的采用。目前的研究使用了现代荟萃分析中常用的统计方法来重新评估20世纪早期的研究,并将其与过去20年进行的临床试验进行比较。采用随机效应模型,以95%可信区间(CI)的优势比(or)测量有或无噬菌体治疗后疾病的发展情况。根据1921年至1940年间进行的17项临床试验的结果,噬菌体治疗是有效的(OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 ~ 0.44, P值P值= 0.0009)。结果表明,噬菌体治疗在解决细菌感染方面的效果比标准治疗要差得多。然而,结果受到小样本集大小的影响。这项工作还概述了噬菌体治疗在20世纪初的发展,并强调了噬菌体应用在过去几年的扩展。总之,目前的综述表明噬菌体治疗不再是一种被低估的治疗细菌感染的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reassessment of Historical Clinical Trials Supports the Effectiveness of Phage Therapy.

Phage therapy has become a hot topic in medical research due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. In the treatment of bacterial infections, bacteriophages have several advantages over antibiotics, including strain specificity, lack of serious side effects, and low development costs. However, scientists dismissed the clinical success of early clinical trials in the 1940s, slowing the adoption of this promising antibacterial application in Western countries. The current study used statistical methods commonly used in modern meta-analysis to reevaluate early 20th-century studies and compare them with clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years. Using a random effect model, the development of disease after treatment with or without phages was measured in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on the findings of 17 clinical trials conducted between 1921 and 1940, phage therapy was effective (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.44, P value < 0.0001). The current study includes a topic review on modern clinical trials; four could be analyzed, indicating a noneffective therapy (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.53 to 5.27, P value = 0.0009). The results suggest phage therapy was surprisingly less effective than standard treatments in resolving bacterial infections. However, the results were affected by the small sample set size. This work also contextualizes the development of phage therapy in the early 20th century and highlights the expansion of phage applications in the last few years. In conclusion, the current review shows phage therapy is no longer an underestimated tool in the treatment of bacterial infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Clinical Microbiology Reviews 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
54.20
自引率
0.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology Reviews (CMR) is a journal that primarily focuses on clinical microbiology and immunology.It aims to provide readers with up-to-date information on the latest developments in these fields.CMR also presents the current state of knowledge in clinical microbiology and immunology.Additionally, the journal offers balanced and thought-provoking perspectives on controversial issues in these areas.
期刊最新文献
Group B streptococcal infections in pregnancy and early life. The challenges of difficult-to-treat Acinetobacter infections. Laboratory detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative organisms Animal models for exploring Chagas disease pathogenesis and supporting drug discovery Enriching the future of public health microbiology with hybridization bait capture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1