在编码过程中保持缺陷的离散性可以降低长期护理个体的脆弱指数

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Mechanisms of Ageing and Development Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mad.2023.111851
Brian Greeley , Hilary Low , Ronald Kelly , Robert McDermid , Xiaowei Song
{"title":"在编码过程中保持缺陷的离散性可以降低长期护理个体的脆弱指数","authors":"Brian Greeley ,&nbsp;Hilary Low ,&nbsp;Ronald Kelly ,&nbsp;Robert McDermid ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Song","doi":"10.1016/j.mad.2023.111851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assesses two coding approaches on the frailty index (FI).</p><p>Two FI were calculated using 43 variables from 29,758 older adults (84.6 ± 8 years old; 64 % female) in long-term care. Scores were coded as 0, 0.5, or 1 regardless of the number of levels (grouped), or preserved (e.g., a 4 level variable was coded as 0, 0.33, 0.67, or 1; discrete). Grouped and discrete FI were compared with each ordinal variable removed but all other ordinal variables included. This was repeated until 28 unique (14 grouped, 14 discrete) FI had been constructed each with one ordinal variable removed per FI. FI was correlated to age and mortality separated by sex.</p><p>The median grouped (0.302 (0.221–0.372)) was higher relative to the discrete (0.237 (0.170–0.307)) FI. The discrete (r = 0.91, r = 0.87) and grouped (r = 0.93, r = 0.87) FI showed similar relationships to age and mortality. Removal of any ordinal variable reduced grouped FI by 0.004 or 0.016, whereas removal led to both increases (range: 0.003–0.001) and reductions (range: 0.002–0.008) for discrete FI.</p><p>A grouped approach inflates FI. A discrete approach provides a more accurate measure of frailty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18340,"journal":{"name":"Mechanisms of Ageing and Development","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 111851"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving the discreteness of deficits during coding leads to a lower frailty index in individuals living in long-term care\",\"authors\":\"Brian Greeley ,&nbsp;Hilary Low ,&nbsp;Ronald Kelly ,&nbsp;Robert McDermid ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mad.2023.111851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study assesses two coding approaches on the frailty index (FI).</p><p>Two FI were calculated using 43 variables from 29,758 older adults (84.6 ± 8 years old; 64 % female) in long-term care. Scores were coded as 0, 0.5, or 1 regardless of the number of levels (grouped), or preserved (e.g., a 4 level variable was coded as 0, 0.33, 0.67, or 1; discrete). Grouped and discrete FI were compared with each ordinal variable removed but all other ordinal variables included. This was repeated until 28 unique (14 grouped, 14 discrete) FI had been constructed each with one ordinal variable removed per FI. FI was correlated to age and mortality separated by sex.</p><p>The median grouped (0.302 (0.221–0.372)) was higher relative to the discrete (0.237 (0.170–0.307)) FI. The discrete (r = 0.91, r = 0.87) and grouped (r = 0.93, r = 0.87) FI showed similar relationships to age and mortality. Removal of any ordinal variable reduced grouped FI by 0.004 or 0.016, whereas removal led to both increases (range: 0.003–0.001) and reductions (range: 0.002–0.008) for discrete FI.</p><p>A grouped approach inflates FI. A discrete approach provides a more accurate measure of frailty.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanisms of Ageing and Development\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanisms of Ageing and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047637423000775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanisms of Ageing and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047637423000775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估两种编码方法对脆弱指数(FI)。使用来自29,758名老年人(84.6±8岁;(64%为女性)接受长期护理。得分被编码为0、0.5或1,无论水平(分组)的数量,或保留(例如,一个4水平变量被编码为0、0.33、0.67或1;离散)。将分组和离散FI进行比较,去除每个顺序变量,但包括所有其他顺序变量。重复这一过程,直到构建了28个独特的(14个分组,14个离散)FI,每个FI都删除了一个顺序变量。FI与性别分开的年龄和死亡率相关。组中位数(0.302(0.221-0.372))高于离散FI(0.237(0.170-0.307))。离散FI (r = 0.91, r = 0.87)和分组FI (r = 0.93, r = 0.87)与年龄和死亡率的关系相似。去除任何有序变量将分组FI降低0.004或0.016,而去除离散FI会导致增加(范围:0.003-0.001)和减少(范围:0.002-0.008)。分组方法使FI膨胀。离散的方法提供了更精确的脆弱性度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preserving the discreteness of deficits during coding leads to a lower frailty index in individuals living in long-term care

This study assesses two coding approaches on the frailty index (FI).

Two FI were calculated using 43 variables from 29,758 older adults (84.6 ± 8 years old; 64 % female) in long-term care. Scores were coded as 0, 0.5, or 1 regardless of the number of levels (grouped), or preserved (e.g., a 4 level variable was coded as 0, 0.33, 0.67, or 1; discrete). Grouped and discrete FI were compared with each ordinal variable removed but all other ordinal variables included. This was repeated until 28 unique (14 grouped, 14 discrete) FI had been constructed each with one ordinal variable removed per FI. FI was correlated to age and mortality separated by sex.

The median grouped (0.302 (0.221–0.372)) was higher relative to the discrete (0.237 (0.170–0.307)) FI. The discrete (r = 0.91, r = 0.87) and grouped (r = 0.93, r = 0.87) FI showed similar relationships to age and mortality. Removal of any ordinal variable reduced grouped FI by 0.004 or 0.016, whereas removal led to both increases (range: 0.003–0.001) and reductions (range: 0.002–0.008) for discrete FI.

A grouped approach inflates FI. A discrete approach provides a more accurate measure of frailty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
79
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Mechanisms of Ageing and Development is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at revealing the molecular, biochemical and biological mechanisms that underlie the processes of aging and development in various species as well as of age-associated diseases. Emphasis is placed on investigations that delineate the contribution of macromolecular damage and cytotoxicity, genetic programs, epigenetics and genetic instability, mitochondrial function, alterations of metabolism and innovative anti-aging approaches. For all of the mentioned studies it is necessary to address the underlying mechanisms. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development publishes original research, review and mini-review articles. The journal also publishes Special Issues that focus on emerging research areas. Special issues may include all types of articles following peered review. Proposals should be sent directly to the Editor-in-Chief.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Prenatal glucocorticoid exposure and congenital abdominal wall defects: Involvement of CXCR4 – SDF-1 signaling In reviewing the emerging biomarkers of human inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and their vesicles as potential biomarkers of cardiovascular manifestations and targets for personalized treatments Unlocking diagnosis of sarcopenia: The role of circulating biomarkers – A clinical systematic review p53/HIF-1α regulates neuronal aging and autophagy in spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1