{"title":"别忘了蔬菜!发现并解决蔬菜生理学教育的不足。","authors":"Christian Moro, Charlotte Phelps, Michelle McLean","doi":"10.1152/advan.00052.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ninety-five percent of Westerners do not consume the recommended daily vegetable intake, exacerbating the incidence of obesity, malnutrition, and nutritional deficiencies such as fiber. This article reviews the literature from PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science, as well as Internet sites and government resources, to identify what should be considered important inclusions relating to dietary vegetable (including legumes and pulses) intake content in university physiology subjects. The primary aim is to advance the competency relating to good nutrition knowledge for future health professionals to enable them to guide and counsel patients and clients toward better health. A review of the literature provides scant nutritional content relating to vegetable intake, particularly across physiology subjects and health professional programs in general. A review of country dietary guidelines yielded discrepancies and ambiguity around recommended daily vegetable intake, including what constitutes essential vegetables. Educators responsible for embedding nutritional information in the curriculum would therefore be challenged to find reliable, evidence-based resources. Adding quality curriculum content on the importance of vegetable intake also promotes some of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 2 (<i>Zero Hunger</i>), thereby contributing to SDG 3 (<i>Good Health and Well-Being</i>). This article offers recommendations on how to embed content relating to the importance of dietary vegetables for good health and guidance for educators of health professions programs wanting to improve their curriculum content relating to adequate nutrition.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Is nutritional literacy an important concept in physiology? This article identifies a paucity of content and addresses the need for vegetable intake education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":"47 4","pages":"726-731"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don't forget the veggies! Identifying and addressing a lack of vegetable education in physiology.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Moro, Charlotte Phelps, Michelle McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00052.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ninety-five percent of Westerners do not consume the recommended daily vegetable intake, exacerbating the incidence of obesity, malnutrition, and nutritional deficiencies such as fiber. This article reviews the literature from PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science, as well as Internet sites and government resources, to identify what should be considered important inclusions relating to dietary vegetable (including legumes and pulses) intake content in university physiology subjects. The primary aim is to advance the competency relating to good nutrition knowledge for future health professionals to enable them to guide and counsel patients and clients toward better health. A review of the literature provides scant nutritional content relating to vegetable intake, particularly across physiology subjects and health professional programs in general. A review of country dietary guidelines yielded discrepancies and ambiguity around recommended daily vegetable intake, including what constitutes essential vegetables. Educators responsible for embedding nutritional information in the curriculum would therefore be challenged to find reliable, evidence-based resources. Adding quality curriculum content on the importance of vegetable intake also promotes some of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 2 (<i>Zero Hunger</i>), thereby contributing to SDG 3 (<i>Good Health and Well-Being</i>). This article offers recommendations on how to embed content relating to the importance of dietary vegetables for good health and guidance for educators of health professions programs wanting to improve their curriculum content relating to adequate nutrition.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Is nutritional literacy an important concept in physiology? This article identifies a paucity of content and addresses the need for vegetable intake education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"726-731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00052.2023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00052.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
95%的西方人没有摄入建议的每日蔬菜摄入量,这加剧了肥胖、营养不良和纤维等营养缺乏的发生率。本文综述了PubMed、ERIC和Web of Science的文献,以及互联网网站和政府资源,以确定大学生理学科目中与膳食蔬菜(包括豆类和豆类)摄入内容有关的重要内容。主要目的是提高未来健康专业人员的良好营养知识能力,使他们能够指导和建议患者和客户实现更好的健康。对文献的回顾提供了与蔬菜摄入有关的很少的营养含量,特别是在生理学科目和健康专业课程中。对国家饮食指南的审查发现,建议的每日蔬菜摄入量存在差异和歧义,包括什么是基本蔬菜。因此,负责在课程中嵌入营养信息的教育工作者将面临寻找可靠、循证资源的挑战。增加关于蔬菜摄入重要性的优质课程内容也促进了一些可持续发展目标,包括可持续发展目标2(零饥饿),从而有助于实现可持续发展目标3(良好健康和幸福)。本文就如何嵌入与膳食蔬菜对健康的重要性相关的内容提出了建议,并为希望改善与充足营养相关的课程内容的健康专业项目的教育工作者提供了指导。营养素养是生理学中的一个重要概念吗?这篇文章指出了内容的匮乏,并解决了蔬菜摄入教育的需求。
Don't forget the veggies! Identifying and addressing a lack of vegetable education in physiology.
Ninety-five percent of Westerners do not consume the recommended daily vegetable intake, exacerbating the incidence of obesity, malnutrition, and nutritional deficiencies such as fiber. This article reviews the literature from PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science, as well as Internet sites and government resources, to identify what should be considered important inclusions relating to dietary vegetable (including legumes and pulses) intake content in university physiology subjects. The primary aim is to advance the competency relating to good nutrition knowledge for future health professionals to enable them to guide and counsel patients and clients toward better health. A review of the literature provides scant nutritional content relating to vegetable intake, particularly across physiology subjects and health professional programs in general. A review of country dietary guidelines yielded discrepancies and ambiguity around recommended daily vegetable intake, including what constitutes essential vegetables. Educators responsible for embedding nutritional information in the curriculum would therefore be challenged to find reliable, evidence-based resources. Adding quality curriculum content on the importance of vegetable intake also promotes some of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), thereby contributing to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being). This article offers recommendations on how to embed content relating to the importance of dietary vegetables for good health and guidance for educators of health professions programs wanting to improve their curriculum content relating to adequate nutrition.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Is nutritional literacy an important concept in physiology? This article identifies a paucity of content and addresses the need for vegetable intake education.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.