掌握这门手艺:创作一篇有见地且被广泛引用的文献综述。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING World journal of stem cells Pub Date : 2023-08-26 DOI:10.4252/wjsc.v15.i8.781
Shengwen Calvin Li
{"title":"掌握这门手艺:创作一篇有见地且被广泛引用的文献综述。","authors":"Shengwen Calvin Li","doi":"10.4252/wjsc.v15.i8.781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The art of constructing an insightful literature review manuscript has witnessed an exemplar in the work of Oz <i>et al</i> (2023), wherein concept progression harmoniously merges with figures and tables. Reflecting on retrospective data science, it is evident that well-cited articles can wield a transformative influence on the Journal Citation Reports Impact Factor score, as exemplified by Robert Weinberg's landmark on cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Here, we aim to spotlight a commendable contribution by Tuba Oz, Ajeet Kaushik, and Małgorzata Kujawska in this issue while pivoting towards identifying the hallmarks of a subpar literature review-elements that hinder rather than promote advancement. The hurdles and roadblocks encountered within subpar literature reviews are multifold. Anticipation of emerging trends, identification of challenges, and exploration of solutions remain conspicuously absent. Original Contributions fail to surface amidst the vast sea of pre-existing literature, with noticeable gaps amplified by the lack of illustrative figures and tables. The manuscript, at times, assumes a skeletal form, reflecting an attempt to accommodate an excess of references, leading to convoluted sentences laden with citations. In contrast, a potent solution lies in adopting a comprehensive approach. A nuanced and critical evaluation of sources can culminate in a robust discussion, surpassing the mere summarization of conclusions drawn by others. This approach, often dismissed, holds the potential to elevate clarity, coherence, and logical flow, ultimately inviting engaged readership and coveted citations. The critical necessity of integrating visionary insights is underscored and achieved through a rigorous analysis of pivotal concepts and innovative ideas. Examples can be harnessed to elucidate the application of these solutions. We advocate a paradigm shift, urging literature review writers to embrace the readers' perspective. A literature review's purpose extends beyond providing a comprehensive panorama; it should illuminate avenues for concept development within a specific field of interest. By achieving this balance, literature reviews stand to captivate a devoted readership, paving the way for manuscripts that are both widely read and frequently cited. The pathway forward requires a fusion of astute analysis and visionary insights, shaping the future of literature review composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":23775,"journal":{"name":"World journal of stem cells","volume":"15 8","pages":"781-786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/48/WJSC-15-781.PMC10494571.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mastering the craft: Creating an insightful and widely-cited literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Shengwen Calvin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4252/wjsc.v15.i8.781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The art of constructing an insightful literature review manuscript has witnessed an exemplar in the work of Oz <i>et al</i> (2023), wherein concept progression harmoniously merges with figures and tables. Reflecting on retrospective data science, it is evident that well-cited articles can wield a transformative influence on the Journal Citation Reports Impact Factor score, as exemplified by Robert Weinberg's landmark on cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Here, we aim to spotlight a commendable contribution by Tuba Oz, Ajeet Kaushik, and Małgorzata Kujawska in this issue while pivoting towards identifying the hallmarks of a subpar literature review-elements that hinder rather than promote advancement. The hurdles and roadblocks encountered within subpar literature reviews are multifold. Anticipation of emerging trends, identification of challenges, and exploration of solutions remain conspicuously absent. Original Contributions fail to surface amidst the vast sea of pre-existing literature, with noticeable gaps amplified by the lack of illustrative figures and tables. The manuscript, at times, assumes a skeletal form, reflecting an attempt to accommodate an excess of references, leading to convoluted sentences laden with citations. In contrast, a potent solution lies in adopting a comprehensive approach. A nuanced and critical evaluation of sources can culminate in a robust discussion, surpassing the mere summarization of conclusions drawn by others. This approach, often dismissed, holds the potential to elevate clarity, coherence, and logical flow, ultimately inviting engaged readership and coveted citations. The critical necessity of integrating visionary insights is underscored and achieved through a rigorous analysis of pivotal concepts and innovative ideas. Examples can be harnessed to elucidate the application of these solutions. We advocate a paradigm shift, urging literature review writers to embrace the readers' perspective. A literature review's purpose extends beyond providing a comprehensive panorama; it should illuminate avenues for concept development within a specific field of interest. By achieving this balance, literature reviews stand to captivate a devoted readership, paving the way for manuscripts that are both widely read and frequently cited. The pathway forward requires a fusion of astute analysis and visionary insights, shaping the future of literature review composition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of stem cells\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"781-786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/48/WJSC-15-781.PMC10494571.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of stem cells\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v15.i8.781\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of stem cells","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v15.i8.781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Oz等人(2023)的作品中,构建有见地的文献评论手稿的艺术是一个范例,其中概念进展与数字和表格和谐地融合在一起。回顾回顾性数据科学,很明显,被广泛引用的文章可以对《期刊引用报告》的影响因子得分产生变革性的影响,罗伯特·温伯格(Robert Weinberg)关于癌症的里程碑式研究就是一个例子(Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011)。在这里,我们的目标是突出Tuba Oz, Ajeet Kaushik和Małgorzata Kujawska在本期中做出的值得赞扬的贡献,同时重点确定不合格文献综述的特征-阻碍而不是促进进步的因素。在不合格的文献综述中遇到的障碍和障碍是多方面的。对新趋势的预测、对挑战的识别和对解决方案的探索仍然明显缺失。原始贡献没有出现在浩瀚的已有文献中,由于缺乏说明性的数字和表格,明显的差距被放大了。手稿有时呈现出一种骨架的形式,反映出试图容纳过多的参考文献,导致句子中充斥着引用。相反,有效的解决办法在于采取全面的办法。对信息来源进行细致入微的批判性评估,可以促成一场强有力的讨论,而不仅仅是对他人得出的结论进行总结。这种方法经常被忽视,但它有可能提高文章的清晰度、连贯性和逻辑性,最终吸引吸引人的读者和令人垂涎的引用。通过对关键概念和创新思想的严格分析,强调并实现整合远见卓识的关键必要性。可以利用实例来阐明这些解决方案的应用。我们提倡一种范式转换,敦促文学评论作者拥抱读者的视角。文献综述的目的不仅仅是提供一个全面的全景;它应该阐明在特定领域内概念发展的途径。通过实现这种平衡,文学评论能够吸引忠实的读者,为广泛阅读和经常引用的手稿铺平道路。前进的道路需要敏锐的分析和远见卓识的融合,塑造未来的文献综述组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mastering the craft: Creating an insightful and widely-cited literature review.

The art of constructing an insightful literature review manuscript has witnessed an exemplar in the work of Oz et al (2023), wherein concept progression harmoniously merges with figures and tables. Reflecting on retrospective data science, it is evident that well-cited articles can wield a transformative influence on the Journal Citation Reports Impact Factor score, as exemplified by Robert Weinberg's landmark on cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Here, we aim to spotlight a commendable contribution by Tuba Oz, Ajeet Kaushik, and Małgorzata Kujawska in this issue while pivoting towards identifying the hallmarks of a subpar literature review-elements that hinder rather than promote advancement. The hurdles and roadblocks encountered within subpar literature reviews are multifold. Anticipation of emerging trends, identification of challenges, and exploration of solutions remain conspicuously absent. Original Contributions fail to surface amidst the vast sea of pre-existing literature, with noticeable gaps amplified by the lack of illustrative figures and tables. The manuscript, at times, assumes a skeletal form, reflecting an attempt to accommodate an excess of references, leading to convoluted sentences laden with citations. In contrast, a potent solution lies in adopting a comprehensive approach. A nuanced and critical evaluation of sources can culminate in a robust discussion, surpassing the mere summarization of conclusions drawn by others. This approach, often dismissed, holds the potential to elevate clarity, coherence, and logical flow, ultimately inviting engaged readership and coveted citations. The critical necessity of integrating visionary insights is underscored and achieved through a rigorous analysis of pivotal concepts and innovative ideas. Examples can be harnessed to elucidate the application of these solutions. We advocate a paradigm shift, urging literature review writers to embrace the readers' perspective. A literature review's purpose extends beyond providing a comprehensive panorama; it should illuminate avenues for concept development within a specific field of interest. By achieving this balance, literature reviews stand to captivate a devoted readership, paving the way for manuscripts that are both widely read and frequently cited. The pathway forward requires a fusion of astute analysis and visionary insights, shaping the future of literature review composition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of stem cells
World journal of stem cells Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
750
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Stem Cells (WJSC) is a leading academic journal devoted to reporting the latest, cutting-edge research progress and findings of basic research and clinical practice in the field of stem cells. It was launched on December 31, 2009 and is published monthly (12 issues annually) by BPG, the world''s leading professional clinical medical journal publishing company.
期刊最新文献
Gamma-aminobutyric acid enhances miR-21-5p loading into adipose-derived stem cell extracellular vesicles to alleviate myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via TXNIP regulation. Bioengineering breakthroughs: The impact of stem cell models on advanced therapy medicinal product development. Emergence of the stromal vascular fraction and secretome in regenerative medicine. Enhancing the functionality of mesenchymal stem cells: An attractive treatment strategy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease? Innovative mesenchymal stem cell treatments for fatty liver disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1