ART周期子宫内膜腔积液吸入地奥司明:一项随机对照试验。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s13224-023-01791-7
Ahmed Samy Saad, Khalid Abd Aziz Mohamed
{"title":"ART周期子宫内膜腔积液吸入地奥司明:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ahmed Samy Saad, Khalid Abd Aziz Mohamed","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01791-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This was a prospective randomized controlled trial in 200 cases presented with endometrial cavity fluid at the day of oocyte retrieval at a private fertility center from 2013 to 2021. The cases were randomized at day of ovum pickup into 2 groups: Group 1 (control group) (<i>n</i> = 100): conventional management with follow-up and reassessment by transvaginal ultrasound on day 5. Group 2 (interventional group) (<i>n</i> = 100): aspiration of the fluid was done and cases were given diosmin 500 mg 3 times per day till reassessment at embryo transfer day. In both groups, we proceeded with fresh embryo transfer if no fluid is present on day 5 or freeze-all policy if persistent fluid was detected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endometrial fluid on the 5th day was significantly higher in the control group (28.0%) than in the interventional group (6.0%) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Regarding pregnancy rate, although being higher in the interventional group (54.3% vs 50.0%), the difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.5). It was found that the intervention was associated with risk reduction of endometrial fluid (OR = 0.168, 95% CI = 0.065-0.429, <i>P</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspiration of endometrial cavity fluid with diosmin intake increased the likelihood of fresh embryo transfer and with a slightly better pregnancy rate compared to conservative management.Clinical trial number: NCT02158000, Date of registration: 6/6/2014, Date of initial enrollment (first patient recruiting): 1/11/2014, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158000.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"73 4","pages":"336-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspiration with Diosmin Intake in Endometrial Cavity Fluid Accumulation in ART Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Samy Saad, Khalid Abd Aziz Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-023-01791-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This was a prospective randomized controlled trial in 200 cases presented with endometrial cavity fluid at the day of oocyte retrieval at a private fertility center from 2013 to 2021. The cases were randomized at day of ovum pickup into 2 groups: Group 1 (control group) (<i>n</i> = 100): conventional management with follow-up and reassessment by transvaginal ultrasound on day 5. Group 2 (interventional group) (<i>n</i> = 100): aspiration of the fluid was done and cases were given diosmin 500 mg 3 times per day till reassessment at embryo transfer day. In both groups, we proceeded with fresh embryo transfer if no fluid is present on day 5 or freeze-all policy if persistent fluid was detected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endometrial fluid on the 5th day was significantly higher in the control group (28.0%) than in the interventional group (6.0%) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Regarding pregnancy rate, although being higher in the interventional group (54.3% vs 50.0%), the difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.5). It was found that the intervention was associated with risk reduction of endometrial fluid (OR = 0.168, 95% CI = 0.065-0.429, <i>P</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspiration of endometrial cavity fluid with diosmin intake increased the likelihood of fresh embryo transfer and with a slightly better pregnancy rate compared to conservative management.Clinical trial number: NCT02158000, Date of registration: 6/6/2014, Date of initial enrollment (first patient recruiting): 1/11/2014, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158000.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"336-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01791-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01791-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验,涉及2013年至2021年在私人生育中心取卵当天出现子宫内膜腔液的200例患者。这些病例在取卵当天被随机分为两组:第一组(对照组)(n = 100):常规治疗,第5天通过经阴道超声随访和重新评估。第2组(介入组)(n = 100):进行液体抽吸,并给病例服用地奥司明500mg,每天3次,直到胚胎移植日重新评估。在这两组中,如果第5天没有液体,我们进行新鲜胚胎移植,如果检测到持续液体,则冷冻所有策略。结果:对照组第5天子宫内膜积液(28.0%)明显高于介入组(6.0%)(P P = 0.5)。研究发现,干预与子宫内膜液风险降低有关(OR = 0.168,95%CI = 0.065-0.429,P 结论:与保守治疗相比,吸入地奥司明的子宫内膜腔液增加了新鲜胚胎移植的可能性,妊娠率略高。临床试验编号:NCT02158000,注册日期:2014年6月6日,首次入选日期(首次患者招募):2014年11月1日,网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158000.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspiration with Diosmin Intake in Endometrial Cavity Fluid Accumulation in ART Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial in 200 cases presented with endometrial cavity fluid at the day of oocyte retrieval at a private fertility center from 2013 to 2021. The cases were randomized at day of ovum pickup into 2 groups: Group 1 (control group) (n = 100): conventional management with follow-up and reassessment by transvaginal ultrasound on day 5. Group 2 (interventional group) (n = 100): aspiration of the fluid was done and cases were given diosmin 500 mg 3 times per day till reassessment at embryo transfer day. In both groups, we proceeded with fresh embryo transfer if no fluid is present on day 5 or freeze-all policy if persistent fluid was detected.

Results: Endometrial fluid on the 5th day was significantly higher in the control group (28.0%) than in the interventional group (6.0%) (P < 0.001). Regarding pregnancy rate, although being higher in the interventional group (54.3% vs 50.0%), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.5). It was found that the intervention was associated with risk reduction of endometrial fluid (OR = 0.168, 95% CI = 0.065-0.429, P < 0.001.

Conclusion: Aspiration of endometrial cavity fluid with diosmin intake increased the likelihood of fresh embryo transfer and with a slightly better pregnancy rate compared to conservative management.Clinical trial number: NCT02158000, Date of registration: 6/6/2014, Date of initial enrollment (first patient recruiting): 1/11/2014, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158000.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
期刊最新文献
"To Give or Not to Give": Evolution of Recommendations on Administering Antenatal Corticosteroids in Late Preterm or Early Term. Call For Action: The Obstetrician's Role In Peripartum Mental Health. Predictive Role of HE4 in Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors. The Conundrum of Preterm Labour and Premature Births in Present Day Obstetrics. "Modernizing Cervical Cytology Screening with Liquid-Based Methods at Community-Level Hospitals: A Much-Needed Breakthrough for India".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1