虚拟与面对面的眼科访谈:2022-2023年美国眼科奖学金申请人的看法。

Elliot G Cherkas, Charlotte N Shields, Nikhil Mandava, Lily Zhang, Arunan Sivalingam, Richard S Kaiser, Jonathan S Myers, Kristin M Hammersmith, Reza Razeghinejad, Brenton D Finklea, Carol L Shields, Jayanth Sridhar, Michael A Klufas
{"title":"虚拟与面对面的眼科访谈:2022-2023年美国眼科奖学金申请人的看法。","authors":"Elliot G Cherkas,&nbsp;Charlotte N Shields,&nbsp;Nikhil Mandava,&nbsp;Lily Zhang,&nbsp;Arunan Sivalingam,&nbsp;Richard S Kaiser,&nbsp;Jonathan S Myers,&nbsp;Kristin M Hammersmith,&nbsp;Reza Razeghinejad,&nbsp;Brenton D Finklea,&nbsp;Carol L Shields,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar,&nbsp;Michael A Klufas","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  Despite easing restrictions on social distancing and travel since the beginning of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, virtual interviews remain a widely used format for ophthalmology fellowship interviews. This study aims to evaluate the relative benefits and drawbacks of in-person versus virtual interviews during a cycle where both formats were prevalent. <b>Methods</b>  A prospective cross-sectional study surveyed all fellowship applicants ( <i>N</i>  = 311) who applied to Wills Eye Hospital and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. <b>Results</b>  A total of 59 (19%) applicants responded to the survey, with the majority being male (53.0%) and between the ages of 20 and 35 (91.3%). There was no statistically significant difference between the number of virtual and in-person interviews attended or the total number of interviews attended. The highest ranked limitations of the virtual interview process were limited exposure to details of the program structure, limited opportunity to exhibit applicants' strengths to the program, and limited exposure to the fellows. The highest ranked strengths were less pressure during interviews, greater scheduling flexibility, and ability to interview at more fellowship programs. The highest ranked limitations of the in-person interview process were more pressure during interviews, inability to interview at all desired fellowship programs, and decreased scheduling flexibility. The highest ranked strengths based on median rankings were greater exposure to details of the program structure, greater ability to exhibit an applicant's strengths to the program, and greater exposure to the geographic location/city. <b>Conclusion</b>  While both in-person and virtual interviews have their own benefits and limitations, virtual interviews appear to be more cost-effective and time-efficient while in-person interviews provide better opportunities to assess program fit and culture. A hybrid format that combines the ideal aspects of both formats may be an optimal solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e197-e203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/4a/10-1055-s-0043-1772458.PMC10497345.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual versus In-Person Ophthalmology Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2022-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Elliot G Cherkas,&nbsp;Charlotte N Shields,&nbsp;Nikhil Mandava,&nbsp;Lily Zhang,&nbsp;Arunan Sivalingam,&nbsp;Richard S Kaiser,&nbsp;Jonathan S Myers,&nbsp;Kristin M Hammersmith,&nbsp;Reza Razeghinejad,&nbsp;Brenton D Finklea,&nbsp;Carol L Shields,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar,&nbsp;Michael A Klufas\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1772458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  Despite easing restrictions on social distancing and travel since the beginning of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, virtual interviews remain a widely used format for ophthalmology fellowship interviews. This study aims to evaluate the relative benefits and drawbacks of in-person versus virtual interviews during a cycle where both formats were prevalent. <b>Methods</b>  A prospective cross-sectional study surveyed all fellowship applicants ( <i>N</i>  = 311) who applied to Wills Eye Hospital and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. <b>Results</b>  A total of 59 (19%) applicants responded to the survey, with the majority being male (53.0%) and between the ages of 20 and 35 (91.3%). There was no statistically significant difference between the number of virtual and in-person interviews attended or the total number of interviews attended. The highest ranked limitations of the virtual interview process were limited exposure to details of the program structure, limited opportunity to exhibit applicants' strengths to the program, and limited exposure to the fellows. The highest ranked strengths were less pressure during interviews, greater scheduling flexibility, and ability to interview at more fellowship programs. The highest ranked limitations of the in-person interview process were more pressure during interviews, inability to interview at all desired fellowship programs, and decreased scheduling flexibility. The highest ranked strengths based on median rankings were greater exposure to details of the program structure, greater ability to exhibit an applicant's strengths to the program, and greater exposure to the geographic location/city. <b>Conclusion</b>  While both in-person and virtual interviews have their own benefits and limitations, virtual interviews appear to be more cost-effective and time-efficient while in-person interviews provide better opportunities to assess program fit and culture. A hybrid format that combines the ideal aspects of both formats may be an optimal solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"e197-e203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/4a/10-1055-s-0043-1772458.PMC10497345.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,对社交距离和旅行的限制有所放松,但虚拟面试仍然是眼科奖学金面试中广泛使用的一种形式。本研究旨在评估面对面面试与虚拟面试在两种形式普遍存在的周期中的相对利弊。方法前瞻性横断面研究调查了2022年至2023年期间申请威尔斯眼科医院和巴斯科姆帕尔默眼科研究所的所有奖学金申请人(N = 311)。结果共有59人(19%)参与调查,其中男性占53.0%,年龄在20 - 35岁之间(91.3%)。参加虚拟面试和面对面面试的次数以及参加面试的总次数之间没有统计学上的显著差异。虚拟面试过程中排名最高的限制是:对项目结构细节的接触有限,对申请人在项目中展示优势的机会有限,以及对研究员的接触有限。排名最高的优点是面试时压力更小,时间安排更灵活,能够面试更多的奖学金项目。面试过程中排名最高的限制是面试时压力更大,无法面试所有想要的奖学金项目,以及日程安排的灵活性降低。根据中位数排名,排名最高的优势是更了解项目结构的细节,更有能力展示申请人在项目中的优势,以及更了解地理位置/城市。虽然面对面面试和虚拟面试都有各自的优点和局限性,但虚拟面试似乎更具成本效益和时间效率,而面对面面试提供了更好的评估项目契合度和文化的机会。结合两种格式的理想方面的混合格式可能是最佳解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virtual versus In-Person Ophthalmology Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2022-2023.

Purpose  Despite easing restrictions on social distancing and travel since the beginning of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, virtual interviews remain a widely used format for ophthalmology fellowship interviews. This study aims to evaluate the relative benefits and drawbacks of in-person versus virtual interviews during a cycle where both formats were prevalent. Methods  A prospective cross-sectional study surveyed all fellowship applicants ( N  = 311) who applied to Wills Eye Hospital and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. Results  A total of 59 (19%) applicants responded to the survey, with the majority being male (53.0%) and between the ages of 20 and 35 (91.3%). There was no statistically significant difference between the number of virtual and in-person interviews attended or the total number of interviews attended. The highest ranked limitations of the virtual interview process were limited exposure to details of the program structure, limited opportunity to exhibit applicants' strengths to the program, and limited exposure to the fellows. The highest ranked strengths were less pressure during interviews, greater scheduling flexibility, and ability to interview at more fellowship programs. The highest ranked limitations of the in-person interview process were more pressure during interviews, inability to interview at all desired fellowship programs, and decreased scheduling flexibility. The highest ranked strengths based on median rankings were greater exposure to details of the program structure, greater ability to exhibit an applicant's strengths to the program, and greater exposure to the geographic location/city. Conclusion  While both in-person and virtual interviews have their own benefits and limitations, virtual interviews appear to be more cost-effective and time-efficient while in-person interviews provide better opportunities to assess program fit and culture. A hybrid format that combines the ideal aspects of both formats may be an optimal solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1