验证基于脊髓工具箱 DeepSeg 算法的新型半自动分割管道,以估算颈椎管面积。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-08 DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A7899
N Mongay-Ochoa, D Pareto, M Alberich, M Tintore, X Montalban, À Rovira, J Sastre-Garriga
{"title":"验证基于脊髓工具箱 DeepSeg 算法的新型半自动分割管道,以估算颈椎管面积。","authors":"N Mongay-Ochoa, D Pareto, M Alberich, M Tintore, X Montalban, À Rovira, J Sastre-Garriga","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A7899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>As in the brain reserve concept, a larger cervical canal area may also protect against disability. In this context, a semiautomated pipeline has been developed to obtain quantitative estimations of the cervical canal area. The aim of the study was to validate the pipeline, to evaluate the consistency of the cervical canal area measurements during a 1-year period, and to compare cervical canal area estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRI acquisitions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eight healthy controls and 18 patients with MS underwent baseline and follow-up 3T brain and cervical spine sagittal 3D MPRAGE. The cervical canal area was measured in all acquisitions, and estimations obtained with the proposed pipeline were compared with manual segmentations performed by 1 evaluator using the Dice similarity coefficient. The cervical canal area estimations obtained on baseline and follow-up T1WI were compared; brain and cervical cord acquisitions were also compared using the individual and average intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the manual cervical canal area masks and the masks provided by the proposed pipeline was excellent, with a mean Dice similarity coefficient mean of 0.90 (range, 0.73-0.97). The cervical canal area estimations obtained from baseline and follow-up scans showed a good level of concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88); estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRIs also had good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed pipeline is a reliable tool to estimate the cervical canal area. The cervical canal area is a stable measure across time; moreover, when cervical sequences are not available, the cervical canal area could be estimated using brain T1WI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7875,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"44 7","pages":"867-872"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a New Semiautomated Segmentation Pipeline Based on the Spinal Cord Toolbox DeepSeg Algorithm to Estimate the Cervical Canal Area.\",\"authors\":\"N Mongay-Ochoa, D Pareto, M Alberich, M Tintore, X Montalban, À Rovira, J Sastre-Garriga\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A7899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>As in the brain reserve concept, a larger cervical canal area may also protect against disability. In this context, a semiautomated pipeline has been developed to obtain quantitative estimations of the cervical canal area. The aim of the study was to validate the pipeline, to evaluate the consistency of the cervical canal area measurements during a 1-year period, and to compare cervical canal area estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRI acquisitions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eight healthy controls and 18 patients with MS underwent baseline and follow-up 3T brain and cervical spine sagittal 3D MPRAGE. The cervical canal area was measured in all acquisitions, and estimations obtained with the proposed pipeline were compared with manual segmentations performed by 1 evaluator using the Dice similarity coefficient. The cervical canal area estimations obtained on baseline and follow-up T1WI were compared; brain and cervical cord acquisitions were also compared using the individual and average intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the manual cervical canal area masks and the masks provided by the proposed pipeline was excellent, with a mean Dice similarity coefficient mean of 0.90 (range, 0.73-0.97). The cervical canal area estimations obtained from baseline and follow-up scans showed a good level of concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88); estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRIs also had good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed pipeline is a reliable tool to estimate the cervical canal area. The cervical canal area is a stable measure across time; moreover, when cervical sequences are not available, the cervical canal area could be estimated using brain T1WI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\"44 7\",\"pages\":\"867-872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7899\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:与脑储备概念一样,较大的颈管面积也可以防止残疾。在这种情况下,我们开发了一种半自动化管道,以获得颈椎管面积的定量估计值。本研究的目的是验证该管道,评估一年内颈管面积测量的一致性,并比较从大脑和颈椎磁共振成像获取的颈管面积估算值:8 名健康对照组和 18 名多发性硬化症患者接受了基线和随访 3T 脑和颈椎矢状面三维 MPRAGE 检查。在所有采集中都测量了颈椎管面积,并将使用拟议管道获得的估计值与一名评估者使用 Dice 相似系数进行的人工分割进行了比较。比较了基线和随访 T1WI 获得的颈管面积估计值;还使用单个和平均类内相关系数比较了脑和颈髓采集结果:结果:人工颈椎管区域掩膜与拟议管道提供的掩膜之间的一致性非常好,Dice相似性系数平均值为0.90(范围为0.73-0.97)。从基线扫描和随访扫描获得的颈管面积估计值显示出良好的一致性(类内相关系数=0.76;95% CI,0.44-0.88);从脑部和颈部 MRI 获得的估计值也显示出良好的一致性(类内相关系数=0.77;95% CI,0.45-0.90):结论:所提出的管道是估算颈管面积的可靠工具。此外,在没有颈椎序列的情况下,也可以使用脑 T1WI 估算颈椎管面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a New Semiautomated Segmentation Pipeline Based on the Spinal Cord Toolbox DeepSeg Algorithm to Estimate the Cervical Canal Area.

Background and purpose: As in the brain reserve concept, a larger cervical canal area may also protect against disability. In this context, a semiautomated pipeline has been developed to obtain quantitative estimations of the cervical canal area. The aim of the study was to validate the pipeline, to evaluate the consistency of the cervical canal area measurements during a 1-year period, and to compare cervical canal area estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRI acquisitions.

Materials and methods: Eight healthy controls and 18 patients with MS underwent baseline and follow-up 3T brain and cervical spine sagittal 3D MPRAGE. The cervical canal area was measured in all acquisitions, and estimations obtained with the proposed pipeline were compared with manual segmentations performed by 1 evaluator using the Dice similarity coefficient. The cervical canal area estimations obtained on baseline and follow-up T1WI were compared; brain and cervical cord acquisitions were also compared using the individual and average intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: The agreement between the manual cervical canal area masks and the masks provided by the proposed pipeline was excellent, with a mean Dice similarity coefficient mean of 0.90 (range, 0.73-0.97). The cervical canal area estimations obtained from baseline and follow-up scans showed a good level of concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88); estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRIs also had good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90).

Conclusions: The proposed pipeline is a reliable tool to estimate the cervical canal area. The cervical canal area is a stable measure across time; moreover, when cervical sequences are not available, the cervical canal area could be estimated using brain T1WI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
506
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The mission of AJNR is to further knowledge in all aspects of neuroimaging, head and neck imaging, and spine imaging for neuroradiologists, radiologists, trainees, scientists, and associated professionals through print and/or electronic publication of quality peer-reviewed articles that lead to the highest standards in patient care, research, and education and to promote discussion of these and other issues through its electronic activities.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Editorials in Radiology: Can Expert Editors Detect Them? The many faces of myxopapillary ependynomas. Vestibular schwannoma-related increased labyrinthine post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR signal intensity and association with hearing impairment. CNS Embryonal Tumor with PLAGL Amplification, a New Tumor Type in Children and Adolescents: Insights from a Comprehensive MRI Analysis. DSA Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Obliteration in Cerebral AVM following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1