对个性化配件与预设的Axillary Crutch长度设置的比较分析。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Orthopaedic Nursing Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/NOR.0000000000000969
Nicholas Taweel, Charles Langman, Paul Sullivan, Faith Schick, Homyar Karanjia, Dawn T Gulick
{"title":"对个性化配件与预设的Axillary Crutch长度设置的比较分析。","authors":"Nicholas Taweel,&nbsp;Charles Langman,&nbsp;Paul Sullivan,&nbsp;Faith Schick,&nbsp;Homyar Karanjia,&nbsp;Dawn T Gulick","doi":"10.1097/NOR.0000000000000969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Axillary crutches are the most common assistive devices given to individuals with musculoskeletal injuries in an acute care setting. Nurses are frequently the care provider fitting injured individuals with crutches. This study compared the crutch length determined by the crutch manufacturer's height setting with the crutch length attained after applying a standard clinical protocol for crutch fitting. A total of 116 adults with lower extremity injuries were enrolled. Self-reported height was documented as well as initial crutch length as indicated by the numbers on the push-button feature of the crutches. Subject height with and without shoes was measured. Proper crutch length was then determined using the method described by Bauer et al. (1991). No change between the initial and adjusted crutch settings was made in 43% of the subjects. Change was made in 57% of the subjects: lengthening in 40% and shortening in 17% of subjects. This study revealed the predetermined crutch settings are unreliable and should simply be used as a starting point during a personalized fitting.</p>","PeriodicalId":56102,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Predetermined Axillary Crutch Length Settings to Individualized Fittings.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Taweel,&nbsp;Charles Langman,&nbsp;Paul Sullivan,&nbsp;Faith Schick,&nbsp;Homyar Karanjia,&nbsp;Dawn T Gulick\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NOR.0000000000000969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Axillary crutches are the most common assistive devices given to individuals with musculoskeletal injuries in an acute care setting. Nurses are frequently the care provider fitting injured individuals with crutches. This study compared the crutch length determined by the crutch manufacturer's height setting with the crutch length attained after applying a standard clinical protocol for crutch fitting. A total of 116 adults with lower extremity injuries were enrolled. Self-reported height was documented as well as initial crutch length as indicated by the numbers on the push-button feature of the crutches. Subject height with and without shoes was measured. Proper crutch length was then determined using the method described by Bauer et al. (1991). No change between the initial and adjusted crutch settings was made in 43% of the subjects. Change was made in 57% of the subjects: lengthening in 40% and shortening in 17% of subjects. This study revealed the predetermined crutch settings are unreliable and should simply be used as a starting point during a personalized fitting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000969\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腋下拐杖是在急性护理环境中为肌肉骨骼损伤患者提供的最常见的辅助设备。护士经常是为受伤人员配备拐杖的护理人员。本研究比较了由拐杖制造商的高度设置确定的拐杖长度与应用标准临床方案进行拐杖安装后获得的拐杖长度。共有116名患有下肢损伤的成年人被纳入研究。记录了自我报告的身高以及拐杖按钮特征上的数字所示的初始拐杖长度。测量受试者在穿鞋和不穿鞋的情况下的身高。然后使用Bauer等人(1991)描述的方法确定合适的拐杖长度。43%的受试者在初始和调整后的拐杖设置之间没有变化。57%的受试者发生了变化:40%的受试对象变长,17%的受试人员变短。这项研究表明,预先确定的拐杖设置是不可靠的,应该简单地作为个性化试穿的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Predetermined Axillary Crutch Length Settings to Individualized Fittings.

Axillary crutches are the most common assistive devices given to individuals with musculoskeletal injuries in an acute care setting. Nurses are frequently the care provider fitting injured individuals with crutches. This study compared the crutch length determined by the crutch manufacturer's height setting with the crutch length attained after applying a standard clinical protocol for crutch fitting. A total of 116 adults with lower extremity injuries were enrolled. Self-reported height was documented as well as initial crutch length as indicated by the numbers on the push-button feature of the crutches. Subject height with and without shoes was measured. Proper crutch length was then determined using the method described by Bauer et al. (1991). No change between the initial and adjusted crutch settings was made in 43% of the subjects. Change was made in 57% of the subjects: lengthening in 40% and shortening in 17% of subjects. This study revealed the predetermined crutch settings are unreliable and should simply be used as a starting point during a personalized fitting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Nursing
Orthopaedic Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Nursing is an international journal providing continuing education for orthopaedic nurses. Focusing on a wide variety of clinical settings - hospital unit, physician"s office, ambulatory care centers, emergency room, operating room, rehabilitation facility, community service programs, the client"s home, and others – Orthopaedic Nursing provides departmental sections on current events, organizational activities, research, product and drug information, and literature findings. Articles reflect a commitment to professional development and the nursing profession as well as clinical, administrative, academic, and research areas of the orthopaedic specialty. Official Journal of the National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses (NAON)
期刊最新文献
Accountability, Tidiness, and Flexibility. Description of a Nurse Practitioner-Led Orthogeriatric Model of Care: A Health Record Review. Efficacy of Mindfulness Exercises for Primary Osteoporosis Pain and Balance: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Keep Believing: Transform Through Change. NAON Annual CongressNAON Education Product Highlights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1