ALS基因检测和咨询的循证共识指南。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI:10.1002/acn3.51895
Jennifer Roggenbuck, Breda H. F. Eubank, Joshua Wright, Matthew B. Harms, Stephen J. Kolb, the ALS Genetic Testing and Counseling Guidelines Expert Panel
{"title":"ALS基因检测和咨询的循证共识指南。","authors":"Jennifer Roggenbuck,&nbsp;Breda H. F. Eubank,&nbsp;Joshua Wright,&nbsp;Matthew B. Harms,&nbsp;Stephen J. Kolb,&nbsp;the ALS Genetic Testing and Counseling Guidelines Expert Panel","doi":"10.1002/acn3.51895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) gene discovery, ongoing gene therapy trials, and patient demand have driven increased use of ALS genetic testing. Despite this progress, the offer of genetic testing to persons with ALS is not yet “standard of care.” Our primary goal is to develop clinical ALS genetic counseling and testing guidelines to improve and standardize genetic counseling and testing practice among neurologists, genetic counselors or any provider caring for persons with ALS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Core clinical questions were identified and a rapid review performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015 method. Guideline recommendations were drafted and the strength of evidence for each recommendation was assessed by combining two systems: the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) System and the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP). A modified Delphi approach was used to reach consensus among a group of content experts for each guideline statement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 35 guideline statements were developed. In summary, all persons with ALS should be offered single-step genetic testing, consisting of a <i>C9orf72</i> assay, along with sequencing of <i>SOD1, FUS,</i> and <i>TARDBP,</i> at a minimum. The key education and genetic risk assessments that should be provided before and after testing are delineated. Specific guidance regarding testing methods and reporting for <i>C9orf72</i> and other genes is provided for commercial laboratories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>These evidence-based, consensus guidelines will support all stakeholders in the ALS community in navigating benefits and challenges of genetic testing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"10 11","pages":"2074-2091"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based consensus guidelines for ALS genetic testing and counseling\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Roggenbuck,&nbsp;Breda H. F. Eubank,&nbsp;Joshua Wright,&nbsp;Matthew B. Harms,&nbsp;Stephen J. Kolb,&nbsp;the ALS Genetic Testing and Counseling Guidelines Expert Panel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.51895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) gene discovery, ongoing gene therapy trials, and patient demand have driven increased use of ALS genetic testing. Despite this progress, the offer of genetic testing to persons with ALS is not yet “standard of care.” Our primary goal is to develop clinical ALS genetic counseling and testing guidelines to improve and standardize genetic counseling and testing practice among neurologists, genetic counselors or any provider caring for persons with ALS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Core clinical questions were identified and a rapid review performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015 method. Guideline recommendations were drafted and the strength of evidence for each recommendation was assessed by combining two systems: the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) System and the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP). A modified Delphi approach was used to reach consensus among a group of content experts for each guideline statement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 35 guideline statements were developed. In summary, all persons with ALS should be offered single-step genetic testing, consisting of a <i>C9orf72</i> assay, along with sequencing of <i>SOD1, FUS,</i> and <i>TARDBP,</i> at a minimum. The key education and genetic risk assessments that should be provided before and after testing are delineated. Specific guidance regarding testing methods and reporting for <i>C9orf72</i> and other genes is provided for commercial laboratories.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>These evidence-based, consensus guidelines will support all stakeholders in the ALS community in navigating benefits and challenges of genetic testing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"10 11\",\"pages\":\"2074-2091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.51895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.51895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)基因发现、正在进行的基因治疗试验和患者需求的进展推动了ALS基因检测的使用增加。尽管取得了这一进展,但为ALS患者提供基因检测还不是“标准护理”。我们的主要目标是制定临床ALS基因咨询和检测指南,以改进和规范神经学家的基因咨询和测试实践,遗传顾问或任何照顾ALS患者的提供者。方法:确定核心临床问题,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015方法进行快速审查。起草了指南建议,并通过结合两个系统来评估每个建议的证据强度:建议、评估、开发和评估分级(GRADE)系统和基因组应用实践和预防评估(EGAPP)。采用改进的德尔菲方法,在一组内容专家之间就每条准则声明达成共识。结果:共编制了35份指南声明。总之,所有ALS患者都应接受一步基因检测,至少包括C9orf72检测,以及SOD1、FUS和TARDBP的测序。描述了测试前后应提供的关键教育和遗传风险评估。为商业实验室提供了关于C9orf72和其他基因检测方法和报告的具体指导。解释:这些基于证据的共识指南将支持ALS社区的所有利益相关者应对基因检测的好处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based consensus guidelines for ALS genetic testing and counseling

Objective

Advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) gene discovery, ongoing gene therapy trials, and patient demand have driven increased use of ALS genetic testing. Despite this progress, the offer of genetic testing to persons with ALS is not yet “standard of care.” Our primary goal is to develop clinical ALS genetic counseling and testing guidelines to improve and standardize genetic counseling and testing practice among neurologists, genetic counselors or any provider caring for persons with ALS.

Methods

Core clinical questions were identified and a rapid review performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015 method. Guideline recommendations were drafted and the strength of evidence for each recommendation was assessed by combining two systems: the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) System and the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP). A modified Delphi approach was used to reach consensus among a group of content experts for each guideline statement.

Results

A total of 35 guideline statements were developed. In summary, all persons with ALS should be offered single-step genetic testing, consisting of a C9orf72 assay, along with sequencing of SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP, at a minimum. The key education and genetic risk assessments that should be provided before and after testing are delineated. Specific guidance regarding testing methods and reporting for C9orf72 and other genes is provided for commercial laboratories.

Interpretation

These evidence-based, consensus guidelines will support all stakeholders in the ALS community in navigating benefits and challenges of genetic testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Comprehensive multicentre retrospective analysis for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant lower-grade gliomas. Determinants of long-term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis. Dopaminergic therapy disrupts decision-making in impulsive-compulsive Parkinsonian patients. Incremental clinical value of intraplaque neovascularization in predicting recurrent ischemic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1