无泵与有泵冠状动脉旁路移植术:短期结果。

Q2 Medicine Acta Informatica Medica Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.5455/aim.2023.31.107-110
Ilirijana Haxhibeqiri Karabdic, Slavenka Straus, Nermir Granov, Amel Hadzimehmedagic, Behija Berberovic, Edin Kabil, Muhamed Djedovic, Damir Kurtagic
{"title":"无泵与有泵冠状动脉旁路移植术:短期结果。","authors":"Ilirijana Haxhibeqiri Karabdic,&nbsp;Slavenka Straus,&nbsp;Nermir Granov,&nbsp;Amel Hadzimehmedagic,&nbsp;Behija Berberovic,&nbsp;Edin Kabil,&nbsp;Muhamed Djedovic,&nbsp;Damir Kurtagic","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.107-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major public health issue and a leading cause of death globally. It is one of the most common indications for surgical intervention. There are a lot of different techniques, including CABG, which consists of two approaches: sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy. Different techniques have been developed to improve surgical outcomes, including the use of machine for extracorporal circulation (on-pump) or without it (off-pump).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess whether off-pump CABG offers superior short-term outcomes compared to traditional on-pump CABG in patients undergoing isolated CABG..</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In period between 2022 - 2023, we performed CABG operation in 80 patients. CABG was performed either on- pump or off-pump.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results have shown advantages and disadvantages of one or another type of CABG. We were comparing the duration of surgical procedure, time on mechanical ventilation, drainage volume, neurological incidents, time to discharge, indication for repeat revascularization and mortality between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of surgical technique should be based on individual patient factors, including comorbidities and surgical risks. It is important to say that OPCABG is more challenging than ONCABG, and it is very important that OPCABG is done by skilled, experienced and confident surgeon, which contributes to better outcome and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/af/AIM-31-107.PMC10498367.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Ilirijana Haxhibeqiri Karabdic,&nbsp;Slavenka Straus,&nbsp;Nermir Granov,&nbsp;Amel Hadzimehmedagic,&nbsp;Behija Berberovic,&nbsp;Edin Kabil,&nbsp;Muhamed Djedovic,&nbsp;Damir Kurtagic\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/aim.2023.31.107-110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major public health issue and a leading cause of death globally. It is one of the most common indications for surgical intervention. There are a lot of different techniques, including CABG, which consists of two approaches: sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy. Different techniques have been developed to improve surgical outcomes, including the use of machine for extracorporal circulation (on-pump) or without it (off-pump).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess whether off-pump CABG offers superior short-term outcomes compared to traditional on-pump CABG in patients undergoing isolated CABG..</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In period between 2022 - 2023, we performed CABG operation in 80 patients. CABG was performed either on- pump or off-pump.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results have shown advantages and disadvantages of one or another type of CABG. We were comparing the duration of surgical procedure, time on mechanical ventilation, drainage volume, neurological incidents, time to discharge, indication for repeat revascularization and mortality between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of surgical technique should be based on individual patient factors, including comorbidities and surgical risks. It is important to say that OPCABG is more challenging than ONCABG, and it is very important that OPCABG is done by skilled, experienced and confident surgeon, which contributes to better outcome and survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/af/AIM-31-107.PMC10498367.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.107-110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.107-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,也是全球死亡的主要原因。这是手术干预最常见的指征之一。有很多不同的技术,包括CABG,它包括两种入路:胸骨切开和小胸切开。为了改善手术效果,已经开发了不同的技术,包括使用体外循环机器(有泵)或不使用体外循环机器(无泵)。目的:本研究的目的是评估非泵送CABG是否比传统的有泵送CABG在孤立性CABG患者中提供更好的短期结果。方法:在2022年至2023年期间,我们对80例患者进行了CABG手术。CABG可在泵上或泵外进行。结果:结果显示了一种或另一种冠脉搭桥的优点和缺点。我们比较两组患者的手术时间、机械通气时间、引流量、神经系统事件、出院时间、重复血运重建指征和死亡率。结论:手术技术的选择应根据患者的个体因素,包括合并症和手术风险。值得一提的是,OPCABG比ONCABG更具挑战性,OPCABG由熟练、经验丰富、自信的外科医生完成非常重要,这有助于更好的预后和生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major public health issue and a leading cause of death globally. It is one of the most common indications for surgical intervention. There are a lot of different techniques, including CABG, which consists of two approaches: sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy. Different techniques have been developed to improve surgical outcomes, including the use of machine for extracorporal circulation (on-pump) or without it (off-pump).

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess whether off-pump CABG offers superior short-term outcomes compared to traditional on-pump CABG in patients undergoing isolated CABG..

Methods: In period between 2022 - 2023, we performed CABG operation in 80 patients. CABG was performed either on- pump or off-pump.

Results: The results have shown advantages and disadvantages of one or another type of CABG. We were comparing the duration of surgical procedure, time on mechanical ventilation, drainage volume, neurological incidents, time to discharge, indication for repeat revascularization and mortality between two groups.

Conclusion: The choice of surgical technique should be based on individual patient factors, including comorbidities and surgical risks. It is important to say that OPCABG is more challenging than ONCABG, and it is very important that OPCABG is done by skilled, experienced and confident surgeon, which contributes to better outcome and survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Carotid Stenosis and Pulsatile Index Measured by Transcranial Doppler. Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes. Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants. How Far Goes the Un-ethic of the Authors Who Submit the Articles to the Journals, Or, Better to Say, Their "Scientific Insolence"? Significance of Detecting Antierythrocyte Antibodies in Pretransfusion Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1