印度裂隙中心牙槽骨移植调查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-16 DOI:10.1177/10556656231201491
Badri Thiruvenkatachari, Manoj Prathap, Preeti Jauhar, Panchali Batra, Preetham Shetty, Pramod Subash
{"title":"印度裂隙中心牙槽骨移植调查。","authors":"Badri Thiruvenkatachari, Manoj Prathap, Preeti Jauhar, Panchali Batra, Preetham Shetty, Pramod Subash","doi":"10.1177/10556656231201491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the factors influencing the type and timing of Alveolar Bone Grafting (ABG) among cleft centers throughout India. To examine the decision-making criteria for orthodontic treatment and the timing of ABG.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This survey was based on a convenience-based sample selected from cleft teams across India. The survey was formulated using the SurveyMonkey platform and emailed to 40 cleft teams. The survey included questions on demographics, timing, surgical protocol, orthodontic protocol, radiograph prescription rate, assessment methods for the success of ABG and three scenarios for evaluating the timing of the bone graft. The Chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the difference in opinion between specialists. The inter-examiner reliability was assessed using Kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five units completed the questionnaire. Most units operate with 1-2 surgeons, with 42.9% of them treating cleft patients for under 5 years. Only 11.4% of centres routinely advised oblique occlusal radiographs for post-surgery evaluation, and 31.4% prescribed CBCT. However, 40% of cleft teams did not perform audits to evaluate the success of ABG, and less than 50% advised radiographs six months post-surgery. Around 26% of centres do not routinely provide orthodontic treatment pre-ABG. The inter-examiner reliability for case scenarios showed poor agreement between the clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey showed a serious lack of consensus in the ABG treatment among cleft teams in India and emphasises the need for standardised protocols for the treatment of children with cleft palate. There is an urgent need to develop core outcome set in cleft.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey on Alveolar Bone Grafting in Indian Cleft Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Badri Thiruvenkatachari, Manoj Prathap, Preeti Jauhar, Panchali Batra, Preetham Shetty, Pramod Subash\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231201491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the factors influencing the type and timing of Alveolar Bone Grafting (ABG) among cleft centers throughout India. To examine the decision-making criteria for orthodontic treatment and the timing of ABG.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This survey was based on a convenience-based sample selected from cleft teams across India. The survey was formulated using the SurveyMonkey platform and emailed to 40 cleft teams. The survey included questions on demographics, timing, surgical protocol, orthodontic protocol, radiograph prescription rate, assessment methods for the success of ABG and three scenarios for evaluating the timing of the bone graft. The Chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the difference in opinion between specialists. The inter-examiner reliability was assessed using Kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five units completed the questionnaire. Most units operate with 1-2 surgeons, with 42.9% of them treating cleft patients for under 5 years. Only 11.4% of centres routinely advised oblique occlusal radiographs for post-surgery evaluation, and 31.4% prescribed CBCT. However, 40% of cleft teams did not perform audits to evaluate the success of ABG, and less than 50% advised radiographs six months post-surgery. Around 26% of centres do not routinely provide orthodontic treatment pre-ABG. The inter-examiner reliability for case scenarios showed poor agreement between the clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey showed a serious lack of consensus in the ABG treatment among cleft teams in India and emphasises the need for standardised protocols for the treatment of children with cleft palate. There is an urgent need to develop core outcome set in cleft.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231201491\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231201491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估影响印度各地唇裂中心牙槽骨移植(ABG)类型和时机的因素。研究正畸治疗的决策标准和 ABG 的时机:设计:横断面调查:本调查从印度各地的裂隙小组中方便抽取样本。调查使用 SurveyMonkey 平台制定,并通过电子邮件发送给 40 个裂隙团队。调查内容包括人口统计学、时机、手术方案、正畸方案、X 光片处方率、ABG 成功的评估方法以及评估植骨时机的三种情况。采用卡方检验来评估专家之间意见的差异。采用 Kappa 统计法评估了检查者之间的可靠性:35家单位完成了问卷调查。大多数单位由 1-2 名外科医生进行手术,其中 42.9% 的单位治疗裂隙患者的时间在 5 年以下。只有 11.4% 的中心常规建议在手术后进行斜面咬合射线照相评估,31.4% 的中心开具 CBCT 处方。然而,40% 的唇裂团队没有进行审计以评估 ABG 的成功率,不到 50%的团队建议在手术后六个月进行射线照相。约有 26% 的中心没有在 ABG 前提供常规正畸治疗。病例情景的考官间可靠性显示临床医生之间的一致性很差:调查显示,印度的腭裂团队在 ABG 治疗方面严重缺乏共识,并强调有必要为腭裂儿童的治疗制定标准化方案。当务之急是制定腭裂治疗的核心结果集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey on Alveolar Bone Grafting in Indian Cleft Centers.

Objective: To assess the factors influencing the type and timing of Alveolar Bone Grafting (ABG) among cleft centers throughout India. To examine the decision-making criteria for orthodontic treatment and the timing of ABG.

Design: Cross sectional survey.

Method: This survey was based on a convenience-based sample selected from cleft teams across India. The survey was formulated using the SurveyMonkey platform and emailed to 40 cleft teams. The survey included questions on demographics, timing, surgical protocol, orthodontic protocol, radiograph prescription rate, assessment methods for the success of ABG and three scenarios for evaluating the timing of the bone graft. The Chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the difference in opinion between specialists. The inter-examiner reliability was assessed using Kappa statistics.

Results: Thirty-five units completed the questionnaire. Most units operate with 1-2 surgeons, with 42.9% of them treating cleft patients for under 5 years. Only 11.4% of centres routinely advised oblique occlusal radiographs for post-surgery evaluation, and 31.4% prescribed CBCT. However, 40% of cleft teams did not perform audits to evaluate the success of ABG, and less than 50% advised radiographs six months post-surgery. Around 26% of centres do not routinely provide orthodontic treatment pre-ABG. The inter-examiner reliability for case scenarios showed poor agreement between the clinicians.

Conclusion: The survey showed a serious lack of consensus in the ABG treatment among cleft teams in India and emphasises the need for standardised protocols for the treatment of children with cleft palate. There is an urgent need to develop core outcome set in cleft.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Alveolar Cleft Volume and Nasomaxillary Form in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Dermoid Cyst of the Hard Palate: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Internationally Adopted Children with Cleft Lip and Palate. Ultrasound Detection of Fetal Palate Development in the Early Stages of the Second Trimester and Its Clinical Application. Patient Safety and Suitability for Primary Cleft Lip Repair as Day Case Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1