{"title":"改良气管插管袖口预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效。","authors":"Yanshuo Wu, Congcong Zhao, Meirong Sun, Jingjing Bu, Zhenjie Hu, Yanling Yin","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of modifying the cuff on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of a new type of cuff intubation with traditional cuff intubation on VAP incidence and intensive-care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Nine RCTs with 1937 patients were finally evaluated. The pooled results for the incidence of VAP showed that the modified cuff significantly decreased the morbidity of VAP compared with the traditional cuff (relative ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that polyurethane (PU) cuff (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.48, p = 0.52), conical cuff (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p = 0.82) and PU-conical cuff (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.18, p = 0.20) did not decrease the incidence of VAP. Moreover, the improved cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) could significantly reduce the VAP incidence (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001). In terms of ICU mortality, there was no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.02, p = 0.08) between the two groups. The modified cuff is superior to the traditional cuff in VAP prevention. In particular, the modified cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage has more advantages. Key Words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intubation, Endotracheal cuff, Intensive care unit, Meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"33 9","pages":"1050-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Yanshuo Wu, Congcong Zhao, Meirong Sun, Jingjing Bu, Zhenjie Hu, Yanling Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of modifying the cuff on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of a new type of cuff intubation with traditional cuff intubation on VAP incidence and intensive-care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Nine RCTs with 1937 patients were finally evaluated. The pooled results for the incidence of VAP showed that the modified cuff significantly decreased the morbidity of VAP compared with the traditional cuff (relative ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that polyurethane (PU) cuff (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.48, p = 0.52), conical cuff (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p = 0.82) and PU-conical cuff (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.18, p = 0.20) did not decrease the incidence of VAP. Moreover, the improved cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) could significantly reduce the VAP incidence (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001). In terms of ICU mortality, there was no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.02, p = 0.08) between the two groups. The modified cuff is superior to the traditional cuff in VAP prevention. In particular, the modified cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage has more advantages. Key Words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intubation, Endotracheal cuff, Intensive care unit, Meta-analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"33 9\",\"pages\":\"1050-1057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估改良袖带对预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的效果。PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆系统检索了从成立到2022年4月的随机对照试验(rct),比较了新型袖带插管与传统袖带插管对机械通气患者VAP发生率和重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率的影响。9项随机对照试验共1937例患者最终评估。VAP发生率汇总结果显示,改良袖带较传统袖带明显降低VAP发病率(相对比(RR) = 0.73, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.56 ~ 0.95, p = 0.02)。亚组分析显示,聚氨酯(PU)袖带(RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46 ~ 1.48, p = 0.52)、锥形袖带(RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73 ~ 1.28, p = 0.82)和PU-锥形袖带(RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85 ~ 2.18, p = 0.20)并没有降低VAP的发生率。改良袖带联合声门下分泌物引流(SSD)可显著降低VAP发生率(RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001)。ICU病死率方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义(RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68 ~ 1.02, p = 0.08)。改良袖带在预防VAP方面优于传统袖带。特别是改良袖带结合声门下分泌物引流更有优势。关键词:呼吸机相关性肺炎,插管,气管内袖带,重症监护病房,meta分析
Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of modifying the cuff on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of a new type of cuff intubation with traditional cuff intubation on VAP incidence and intensive-care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Nine RCTs with 1937 patients were finally evaluated. The pooled results for the incidence of VAP showed that the modified cuff significantly decreased the morbidity of VAP compared with the traditional cuff (relative ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that polyurethane (PU) cuff (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.48, p = 0.52), conical cuff (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p = 0.82) and PU-conical cuff (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.18, p = 0.20) did not decrease the incidence of VAP. Moreover, the improved cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) could significantly reduce the VAP incidence (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001). In terms of ICU mortality, there was no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.02, p = 0.08) between the two groups. The modified cuff is superior to the traditional cuff in VAP prevention. In particular, the modified cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage has more advantages. Key Words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intubation, Endotracheal cuff, Intensive care unit, Meta-analysis.