[Performance and cost calculation for a university ophthalmological outpatient clinic].

Background: Outpatient procedures at a university hospital are generally considered to be unprofitable. In the present publication we evaluate the turnover and costs of the university eye outpatient department of the Hannover Medical School (MHH) in terms of a cost unit accounting as well as providing a summary of the workload.

Material and method: Given the data of the hospital information system (IS-H/i.s.h.med from SAP) and a proprietary software (TimeElement), all patient contacts in the year 2019 were evaluated. The latter software is applied in a standardized manner to record the patient flow of our outpatient service in real time electronically. The total costs consist of personnel, material and room costs including infrastructure of the MHH and are compared to the flat-rate revenues according to the university outpatient contract (HSA) as well as further revenues from internal referral services, self-pay patients, outpatient surgery and cooperation contracts for intravitreal injections (IVOM).

Results: With an average full-time equivalent (FTE) headcount of 10.63 assistant physicians, 3.6 specialist physicians, and 21 nonphysicians (plus 4 Federal Volunteer Service, BUFDI) in our policlinic, we have determined € 2,927,022 in personnel costs, including overheads, for the entire year. Including infrastructure (€ 524,942), material and equipment costs with overheads and internal cost allocation of € 258.657, the total costs in 2019 resulted in € 3,710,621. In contrast, the total income in 2019 was € 3,524,737 generated through the abovementioned patient segments, resulting in a deficit of € -185,884 (5%). Our data provide evidence that regular outpatient revenues are insufficient and are mainly balanced by outpatient surgery, IVOMs and self-pay patients. In total, there were 19,453 patient contacts during regular office hours (with 17,305 billable cases). At n = 9943, the majority of the contacts were HSA visits; however, only 82% of the cases could effectively be charged due to multiple visits per quarter. The median total patient attendance was 3.21 h (mean 3.38 h). On average, 78 patient contacts were counted per working day. The analysis with TimeElement unveiled a median of n = 2 physician contacts per patient (mean n = 1.91). The median duration per interaction with a physician was 17.98 min (mean 23.23 min). For diagnostics, we counted a median of n = 2 interactions per patient (mean n = 2.31), with an entire interaction lasting a median of 18.30 min (mean 22.60 min). In total n = 37,363 individual diagnostic procedures were recorded in 2019, with SD-OCT being the primary procedure at n = 10,888.

Conclusion: The cost/turnover calculation showed a marginal financial loss through our ophthalmological outpatient department. Thus, the costs of a university eye outpatient department in Lower Saxony do not seem to be sufficiently covered by direct outpatient revenues. Maintaining quarterly flat rates for all cases of the outpatient department would require a fee of about € 214 in our setting to remain cost neutral. Currently, the lower flat rates in the HSA area are compensated by other areas. Obviously, the high content-related workload in our setting requires a high personnel expenditure with a considerable personnel cost contribution of nearly 80%.