二甲双胍在治疗成人精神病患者抗精神病药物引起的体重增加中的作用:采用GRADE方法制定首个循证指南。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Evidence Based Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291
Ita Fitzgerald, Jean O'Connell, Dolores Keating, Caroline Hynes, Stephen McWilliams, Erin K Crowley
{"title":"二甲双胍在治疗成人精神病患者抗精神病药物引起的体重增加中的作用:采用GRADE方法制定首个循证指南。","authors":"Ita Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Jean O'Connell,&nbsp;Dolores Keating,&nbsp;Caroline Hynes,&nbsp;Stephen McWilliams,&nbsp;Erin K Crowley","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjunctive metformin is the most well-studied intervention in the pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). Although a relatively unaddressed area, among guidelines recommending consideration of metformin, prescribing information that would facilitate its applied use by clinicians, for example, provision of a dose titration schedule is absent. Moreover, recommendations differ regarding metformin's place in the hierarchy of management options. Both represent significant barriers to the applied, evidence-based use of metformin for this indication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To produce a guideline solely dedicated to the optimised use of metformin in AIWG management, using internationally endorsed guideline methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of guideline key health questions (KHQs) was produced. It was agreed that individual recommendations would be 'adopted or adapted' from current guidelines and/or developed de novo, in the case of unanswered questions. A systematic literature review (2008-2020) was undertaken to identify published guidelines and supporting (or more recent) research evidence. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) assessment,and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, where appropriate. Assessment of evidence certainty and recommendation development was undertaken using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We confirmed that no published guideline-of appropriate quality, solely dedicated to the use of metformin to manage AIWG was available. Recommendations located within other guidelines inadequately addressed our KHQs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 11 recommendations and 7 supporting good practice developed here were formulated de novo.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These recommendations build on the number and quality of recommendations in this area, and facilitate the optimised use of metformin when managing AIWG.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788031/pdf/","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in adults with psychosis: development of the first evidence-based guideline using GRADE methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Ita Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Jean O'Connell,&nbsp;Dolores Keating,&nbsp;Caroline Hynes,&nbsp;Stephen McWilliams,&nbsp;Erin K Crowley\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjunctive metformin is the most well-studied intervention in the pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). Although a relatively unaddressed area, among guidelines recommending consideration of metformin, prescribing information that would facilitate its applied use by clinicians, for example, provision of a dose titration schedule is absent. Moreover, recommendations differ regarding metformin's place in the hierarchy of management options. Both represent significant barriers to the applied, evidence-based use of metformin for this indication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To produce a guideline solely dedicated to the optimised use of metformin in AIWG management, using internationally endorsed guideline methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of guideline key health questions (KHQs) was produced. It was agreed that individual recommendations would be 'adopted or adapted' from current guidelines and/or developed de novo, in the case of unanswered questions. A systematic literature review (2008-2020) was undertaken to identify published guidelines and supporting (or more recent) research evidence. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) assessment,and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, where appropriate. Assessment of evidence certainty and recommendation development was undertaken using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We confirmed that no published guideline-of appropriate quality, solely dedicated to the use of metformin to manage AIWG was available. Recommendations located within other guidelines inadequately addressed our KHQs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 11 recommendations and 7 supporting good practice developed here were formulated de novo.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These recommendations build on the number and quality of recommendations in this area, and facilitate the optimised use of metformin when managing AIWG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"15-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

背景:辅助二甲双胍是抗精神病药引起的体重增加(AIWG)的药理学管理中研究最多的干预措施。虽然这是一个相对未解决的领域,但在建议考虑使用二甲双胍的指南中,没有提供有助于临床医生应用二甲双胍的处方信息,例如,没有提供剂量滴定表。此外,关于二甲双胍在管理选择层次结构中的位置,建议有所不同。两者都代表了应用二甲双胍治疗这一适应症的重大障碍。目的:采用国际认可的指南方法,制定一份专门用于优化二甲双胍在AIWG管理中的使用的指南。方法:编制指南关键卫生问题(KHQs)清单。会议同意,在未解决问题的情况下,个别建议将从现行准则中“采纳或改编”,并/或重新制定。进行了系统的文献综述(2008-2020),以确定已发表的指南和支持(或最近的)研究证据。在适当的情况下,使用指南评估研究和评估II工具、评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR)评估和Cochrane偏倚风险2工具进行质量评估。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法对证据确定性和建议发展进行评估。研究结果:我们确认没有出版的适当质量的指南,专门用于使用二甲双胍来管理AIWG。其他指南中的建议没有充分解决我们的问题。结论:本文提出的所有11项建议和7项支持良好做法都是从头制定的。临床意义:这些建议建立在该领域推荐的数量和质量的基础上,并在管理AIWG时促进二甲双胍的优化使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in adults with psychosis: development of the first evidence-based guideline using GRADE methodology.

Background: Adjunctive metformin is the most well-studied intervention in the pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). Although a relatively unaddressed area, among guidelines recommending consideration of metformin, prescribing information that would facilitate its applied use by clinicians, for example, provision of a dose titration schedule is absent. Moreover, recommendations differ regarding metformin's place in the hierarchy of management options. Both represent significant barriers to the applied, evidence-based use of metformin for this indication.

Objective: To produce a guideline solely dedicated to the optimised use of metformin in AIWG management, using internationally endorsed guideline methodology.

Methods: A list of guideline key health questions (KHQs) was produced. It was agreed that individual recommendations would be 'adopted or adapted' from current guidelines and/or developed de novo, in the case of unanswered questions. A systematic literature review (2008-2020) was undertaken to identify published guidelines and supporting (or more recent) research evidence. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) assessment,and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, where appropriate. Assessment of evidence certainty and recommendation development was undertaken using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

Findings: We confirmed that no published guideline-of appropriate quality, solely dedicated to the use of metformin to manage AIWG was available. Recommendations located within other guidelines inadequately addressed our KHQs.

Conclusion: All 11 recommendations and 7 supporting good practice developed here were formulated de novo.

Clinical implications: These recommendations build on the number and quality of recommendations in this area, and facilitate the optimised use of metformin when managing AIWG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
期刊最新文献
Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis. Important adverse events to be evaluated in antidepressant trials and meta-analyses in depression: a large international preference study including patients and healthcare professionals. Comparison of prediction methods for treatment continuation of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Components of smartphone cognitive-behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression among 1093 university students: a factorial trial. Associations between antipsychotics and risk of violent crimes and suicidal behaviour in personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1