Chiharu Shinomiya, Genki Kobayashi, Koji Seike, Momo Yamashita, Luna Yamamori, Takahiro Sugiyama, Mariko Kawamura, Kanto Nishikawa, Ryutaro Goto
{"title":"雌雄巨虫幼虫和成虫的分子形态鉴定及其在该科中的系统发育地位。","authors":"Chiharu Shinomiya, Genki Kobayashi, Koji Seike, Momo Yamashita, Luna Yamamori, Takahiro Sugiyama, Mariko Kawamura, Kanto Nishikawa, Ryutaro Goto","doi":"10.2108/zs220075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Eunice aphroditois</i> (Pallas, 1788) is a large polychaete worm (up to 3 m in length) and the type species of the genus. In Japan, a similar but potentially different species, <i>Eunice</i> cf. <i>aphroditois</i>, is distributed mainly in the rocky shores of the temperate and warm Pacific coasts. Juveniles and adults were suggested to be distinguished by their body color. The juvenile form was previously regarded as distinct species, <i>Eunice flavopicta</i> Izuka, 1912 and <i>Eunice ovalifera</i> Fauvel, 1936, although they are now considered synonymous with <i>E</i>. <i>aphroditois</i>. In this study, we revisited the validity of the present taxonomy based on morphological observations including SEM and microCT, and three molecular markers (cytochrome <i>c</i> oxidase subunit I [COI], 16S rRNA, and histone H3 genes) and investigated the phylogenetic position of <i>E.</i> cf. <i>aphroditois</i> in the family Eunicidae using the combined dataset of three genes (COI + 16S rRNA + 18S rRNA). The adult and juvenile forms were different in body size, color, the distribution of the branchiae and subacicular hooks, and maxillae shape, but not in other characteristics. One individual showed an intermediate body color between the two forms. The adult and juvenile forms shared major haplotypes and the maximum K2P genetic distance of COI was 1.7%, which can be considered within intraspecific variation. In the phylogenetic tree based on the combined gene dataset, <i>E.</i> cf. <i>aphroditois</i> was closely related to <i>Eunice roussaei</i> Quatrefages, 1866 and <i>Eunice</i> cf. <i>violaceomaculata</i> Ehlers, 1887, which are large species from the Mediterranean Sea and the Caribbean Sea, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":24040,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"314-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular and Morphological Assessment of Juvenile and Adult Forms in the Giant Worm <i>Eunice</i> Cf. <i>Aphroditois</i> (Annelida: Eunicidae) and Its Phylogenetic Position in the Family.\",\"authors\":\"Chiharu Shinomiya, Genki Kobayashi, Koji Seike, Momo Yamashita, Luna Yamamori, Takahiro Sugiyama, Mariko Kawamura, Kanto Nishikawa, Ryutaro Goto\",\"doi\":\"10.2108/zs220075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Eunice aphroditois</i> (Pallas, 1788) is a large polychaete worm (up to 3 m in length) and the type species of the genus. In Japan, a similar but potentially different species, <i>Eunice</i> cf. <i>aphroditois</i>, is distributed mainly in the rocky shores of the temperate and warm Pacific coasts. Juveniles and adults were suggested to be distinguished by their body color. The juvenile form was previously regarded as distinct species, <i>Eunice flavopicta</i> Izuka, 1912 and <i>Eunice ovalifera</i> Fauvel, 1936, although they are now considered synonymous with <i>E</i>. <i>aphroditois</i>. In this study, we revisited the validity of the present taxonomy based on morphological observations including SEM and microCT, and three molecular markers (cytochrome <i>c</i> oxidase subunit I [COI], 16S rRNA, and histone H3 genes) and investigated the phylogenetic position of <i>E.</i> cf. <i>aphroditois</i> in the family Eunicidae using the combined dataset of three genes (COI + 16S rRNA + 18S rRNA). The adult and juvenile forms were different in body size, color, the distribution of the branchiae and subacicular hooks, and maxillae shape, but not in other characteristics. One individual showed an intermediate body color between the two forms. The adult and juvenile forms shared major haplotypes and the maximum K2P genetic distance of COI was 1.7%, which can be considered within intraspecific variation. In the phylogenetic tree based on the combined gene dataset, <i>E.</i> cf. <i>aphroditois</i> was closely related to <i>Eunice roussaei</i> Quatrefages, 1866 and <i>Eunice</i> cf. <i>violaceomaculata</i> Ehlers, 1887, which are large species from the Mediterranean Sea and the Caribbean Sea, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoological Science\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"314-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2108/zs220075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2108/zs220075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Molecular and Morphological Assessment of Juvenile and Adult Forms in the Giant Worm Eunice Cf. Aphroditois (Annelida: Eunicidae) and Its Phylogenetic Position in the Family.
Eunice aphroditois (Pallas, 1788) is a large polychaete worm (up to 3 m in length) and the type species of the genus. In Japan, a similar but potentially different species, Eunice cf. aphroditois, is distributed mainly in the rocky shores of the temperate and warm Pacific coasts. Juveniles and adults were suggested to be distinguished by their body color. The juvenile form was previously regarded as distinct species, Eunice flavopicta Izuka, 1912 and Eunice ovalifera Fauvel, 1936, although they are now considered synonymous with E. aphroditois. In this study, we revisited the validity of the present taxonomy based on morphological observations including SEM and microCT, and three molecular markers (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI], 16S rRNA, and histone H3 genes) and investigated the phylogenetic position of E. cf. aphroditois in the family Eunicidae using the combined dataset of three genes (COI + 16S rRNA + 18S rRNA). The adult and juvenile forms were different in body size, color, the distribution of the branchiae and subacicular hooks, and maxillae shape, but not in other characteristics. One individual showed an intermediate body color between the two forms. The adult and juvenile forms shared major haplotypes and the maximum K2P genetic distance of COI was 1.7%, which can be considered within intraspecific variation. In the phylogenetic tree based on the combined gene dataset, E. cf. aphroditois was closely related to Eunice roussaei Quatrefages, 1866 and Eunice cf. violaceomaculata Ehlers, 1887, which are large species from the Mediterranean Sea and the Caribbean Sea, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Zoological Science is published by the Zoological Society of Japan and devoted to publication of original articles, reviews and editorials that cover the broad field of zoology. The journal was founded in 1984 as a result of the consolidation of Zoological Magazine (1888–1983) and Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses (1897–1983), the former official journals of the Zoological Society of Japan. Each annual volume consists of six regular issues, one every two months.