Nuthar Jassam, Thomas Bancroft, Ahai Luvai, Wycliffe Mbagaya, Julian H Barth
{"title":"贝克曼,罗氏和西门子分析平台的维生素B12参考区间。","authors":"Nuthar Jassam, Thomas Bancroft, Ahai Luvai, Wycliffe Mbagaya, Julian H Barth","doi":"10.1177/00045632231202211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin B12 status is assessed primarily by measuring total serum B12 using competitive binding methods. The lack of availability of a standard material and high-level reference measurement procedure affect the trueness of B12 results; this results in variation between methods. This study aimed to determine the reference intervals for vitamin B12 on three routine analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective reference population of healthy individuals was recruited according to the IFCC CRIDL criteria. Vitamin B12 samples were measured on Roche, Beckman and Siemens analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 300 adult subjects were recruited; the central 95th centile values for B12 for Roche (190-678 ng/mL) and Siemens (181-562 ng/mL) analytical platforms were in a close agreement. Beckman DXi, however, showed a significantly lower reference limit (110-562 ng/mL). All reference intervals are in keeping with previously published data but some are not in agreement with manufacturer provided reference interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the quality of the reference intervals plays a significant role in clinical outcome, it is of great importance that laboratories use a method-specific reference interval and if possible, locally derived reference intervals until further method standardization occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"417-422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin B12 reference intervals on Beckman, Roche and Siemens analytical platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Nuthar Jassam, Thomas Bancroft, Ahai Luvai, Wycliffe Mbagaya, Julian H Barth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632231202211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin B12 status is assessed primarily by measuring total serum B12 using competitive binding methods. The lack of availability of a standard material and high-level reference measurement procedure affect the trueness of B12 results; this results in variation between methods. This study aimed to determine the reference intervals for vitamin B12 on three routine analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective reference population of healthy individuals was recruited according to the IFCC CRIDL criteria. Vitamin B12 samples were measured on Roche, Beckman and Siemens analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 300 adult subjects were recruited; the central 95th centile values for B12 for Roche (190-678 ng/mL) and Siemens (181-562 ng/mL) analytical platforms were in a close agreement. Beckman DXi, however, showed a significantly lower reference limit (110-562 ng/mL). All reference intervals are in keeping with previously published data but some are not in agreement with manufacturer provided reference interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the quality of the reference intervals plays a significant role in clinical outcome, it is of great importance that laboratories use a method-specific reference interval and if possible, locally derived reference intervals until further method standardization occurs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"417-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231202211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231202211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vitamin B12 reference intervals on Beckman, Roche and Siemens analytical platforms.
Background: Vitamin B12 status is assessed primarily by measuring total serum B12 using competitive binding methods. The lack of availability of a standard material and high-level reference measurement procedure affect the trueness of B12 results; this results in variation between methods. This study aimed to determine the reference intervals for vitamin B12 on three routine analytical platforms.
Method: A prospective reference population of healthy individuals was recruited according to the IFCC CRIDL criteria. Vitamin B12 samples were measured on Roche, Beckman and Siemens analytical platforms.
Results: In total, 300 adult subjects were recruited; the central 95th centile values for B12 for Roche (190-678 ng/mL) and Siemens (181-562 ng/mL) analytical platforms were in a close agreement. Beckman DXi, however, showed a significantly lower reference limit (110-562 ng/mL). All reference intervals are in keeping with previously published data but some are not in agreement with manufacturer provided reference interval.
Conclusion: As the quality of the reference intervals plays a significant role in clinical outcome, it is of great importance that laboratories use a method-specific reference interval and if possible, locally derived reference intervals until further method standardization occurs.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).