贝克曼,罗氏和西门子分析平台的维生素B12参考区间。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1177/00045632231202211
Nuthar Jassam, Thomas Bancroft, Ahai Luvai, Wycliffe Mbagaya, Julian H Barth
{"title":"贝克曼,罗氏和西门子分析平台的维生素B12参考区间。","authors":"Nuthar Jassam, Thomas Bancroft, Ahai Luvai, Wycliffe Mbagaya, Julian H Barth","doi":"10.1177/00045632231202211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin B12 status is assessed primarily by measuring total serum B12 using competitive binding methods. The lack of availability of a standard material and high-level reference measurement procedure affect the trueness of B12 results; this results in variation between methods. This study aimed to determine the reference intervals for vitamin B12 on three routine analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective reference population of healthy individuals was recruited according to the IFCC CRIDL criteria. Vitamin B12 samples were measured on Roche, Beckman and Siemens analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 300 adult subjects were recruited; the central 95th centile values for B12 for Roche (190-678 ng/mL) and Siemens (181-562 ng/mL) analytical platforms were in a close agreement. Beckman DXi, however, showed a significantly lower reference limit (110-562 ng/mL). All reference intervals are in keeping with previously published data but some are not in agreement with manufacturer provided reference interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the quality of the reference intervals plays a significant role in clinical outcome, it is of great importance that laboratories use a method-specific reference interval and if possible, locally derived reference intervals until further method standardization occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"417-422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin B12 reference intervals on Beckman, Roche and Siemens analytical platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Nuthar Jassam, Thomas Bancroft, Ahai Luvai, Wycliffe Mbagaya, Julian H Barth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632231202211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin B12 status is assessed primarily by measuring total serum B12 using competitive binding methods. The lack of availability of a standard material and high-level reference measurement procedure affect the trueness of B12 results; this results in variation between methods. This study aimed to determine the reference intervals for vitamin B12 on three routine analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective reference population of healthy individuals was recruited according to the IFCC CRIDL criteria. Vitamin B12 samples were measured on Roche, Beckman and Siemens analytical platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 300 adult subjects were recruited; the central 95th centile values for B12 for Roche (190-678 ng/mL) and Siemens (181-562 ng/mL) analytical platforms were in a close agreement. Beckman DXi, however, showed a significantly lower reference limit (110-562 ng/mL). All reference intervals are in keeping with previously published data but some are not in agreement with manufacturer provided reference interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the quality of the reference intervals plays a significant role in clinical outcome, it is of great importance that laboratories use a method-specific reference interval and if possible, locally derived reference intervals until further method standardization occurs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"417-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231202211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231202211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:维生素B12状态的评估主要是通过使用竞争结合法测量血清总B12。缺乏可用的标准材料和高水平参考测量程序影响B12结果的准确性;这导致了不同方法之间的差异。本研究旨在确定三个常规分析平台上维生素B12的参考区间。方法:根据IFCC CRIDL标准招募健康个体的前瞻性参考人群。维生素B12样品在罗氏、贝克曼和西门子分析平台上测定。结果:共招募成人受试者300人;罗氏(190-678 ng/mL)和西门子(181-562 ng/mL)分析平台中B12的中心95百分位值非常接近。然而,Beckman DXi显示的参考限值明显较低(110-562 ng/mL)。所有参考区间与先前公布的数据一致,但有些与制造商提供的参考区间不一致。结论:参考区间的质量对临床结果起着重要的作用,因此在进一步的方法标准化之前,实验室使用特定方法的参考区间,如果可能的话,使用当地衍生的参考区间是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vitamin B12 reference intervals on Beckman, Roche and Siemens analytical platforms.

Background: Vitamin B12 status is assessed primarily by measuring total serum B12 using competitive binding methods. The lack of availability of a standard material and high-level reference measurement procedure affect the trueness of B12 results; this results in variation between methods. This study aimed to determine the reference intervals for vitamin B12 on three routine analytical platforms.

Method: A prospective reference population of healthy individuals was recruited according to the IFCC CRIDL criteria. Vitamin B12 samples were measured on Roche, Beckman and Siemens analytical platforms.

Results: In total, 300 adult subjects were recruited; the central 95th centile values for B12 for Roche (190-678 ng/mL) and Siemens (181-562 ng/mL) analytical platforms were in a close agreement. Beckman DXi, however, showed a significantly lower reference limit (110-562 ng/mL). All reference intervals are in keeping with previously published data but some are not in agreement with manufacturer provided reference interval.

Conclusion: As the quality of the reference intervals plays a significant role in clinical outcome, it is of great importance that laboratories use a method-specific reference interval and if possible, locally derived reference intervals until further method standardization occurs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Study on Reference Intervals of Calprotectin and Pentraxin 3. Coefficients of variation analyses of internal quality control status for blood lead in China from 2015 to 2023. The effects of controlled acute psychological stress on serum cortisol and plasma metanephrine concentrations in healthy subjects. Suggested guide to using lactate gap as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol overdose. Simultaneous quantification of serum symmetric dimethylarginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine for use in a routine clinical laboratory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1