评价REDCap作为汉堡城市健康研究的中心数据收集工具。

Q3 Health Professions Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.3233/SHTI230693
Nils Schönbeck, Yassin Hussein, Alena Haack, Axel Schmager, Ulrike Harney, Leona Trübe, Frank Ückert, Karl Gottfried
{"title":"评价REDCap作为汉堡城市健康研究的中心数据收集工具。","authors":"Nils Schönbeck,&nbsp;Yassin Hussein,&nbsp;Alena Haack,&nbsp;Axel Schmager,&nbsp;Ulrike Harney,&nbsp;Leona Trübe,&nbsp;Frank Ückert,&nbsp;Karl Gottfried","doi":"10.3233/SHTI230693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The collection of examination data for large clinical studies is often done with proprietary systems, which are accompanied by several disadvantages such as high cost and low flexibility. With the use of open-source tools, these disadvantages can be overcome and thereby improve data collection as well as data quality. Here we exemplary use the data collection process of the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS), carried out at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). We evaluated how the recording of the examination data can be converted from an established, proprietary electronic healthcare record (EHR) system to the free-to-use Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this purpose, a technical conversion of the EHR system is described first. Metafiles derived from the EHR system were used for REDCap electronic case report form (eCRF) building. The REDCap system was tested by HCHS study assistants via completion of self-developed tasks mimicking their everyday study life. Usability was quantitatively evaluated via the IBM Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) and qualitatively assessed with a semi-structured interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the IBM CSUQ, the study assistants rated the usage of the basic REDCap system for HCHS examination data collection with an overall score of 4.39, which represents a medium acceptance. The interview feedback was used to formulate user stories to subsequently increase the administrative sovereignty and to conceptualize a REDCap HCHS information technology (IT) infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work aims to serve as a template for evaluating the feasibility of a conversion from a proprietary to a free-to-use data collection tool for large clinical studies such as the HCHS. REDCap has great potential, but extensions and an integration to the current IT infrastructure are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":39242,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","volume":"307 ","pages":"51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating REDCap as the Central Data Collection Tool for the Hamburg City Health Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nils Schönbeck,&nbsp;Yassin Hussein,&nbsp;Alena Haack,&nbsp;Axel Schmager,&nbsp;Ulrike Harney,&nbsp;Leona Trübe,&nbsp;Frank Ückert,&nbsp;Karl Gottfried\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI230693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The collection of examination data for large clinical studies is often done with proprietary systems, which are accompanied by several disadvantages such as high cost and low flexibility. With the use of open-source tools, these disadvantages can be overcome and thereby improve data collection as well as data quality. Here we exemplary use the data collection process of the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS), carried out at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). We evaluated how the recording of the examination data can be converted from an established, proprietary electronic healthcare record (EHR) system to the free-to-use Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this purpose, a technical conversion of the EHR system is described first. Metafiles derived from the EHR system were used for REDCap electronic case report form (eCRF) building. The REDCap system was tested by HCHS study assistants via completion of self-developed tasks mimicking their everyday study life. Usability was quantitatively evaluated via the IBM Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) and qualitatively assessed with a semi-structured interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the IBM CSUQ, the study assistants rated the usage of the basic REDCap system for HCHS examination data collection with an overall score of 4.39, which represents a medium acceptance. The interview feedback was used to formulate user stories to subsequently increase the administrative sovereignty and to conceptualize a REDCap HCHS information technology (IT) infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work aims to serve as a template for evaluating the feasibility of a conversion from a proprietary to a free-to-use data collection tool for large clinical studies such as the HCHS. REDCap has great potential, but extensions and an integration to the current IT infrastructure are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"307 \",\"pages\":\"51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型临床研究的检查数据收集通常是通过专有系统完成的,这伴随着一些缺点,如高成本和低灵活性。通过使用开源工具,可以克服这些缺点,从而改进数据收集和数据质量。在这里,我们示范使用汉堡城市健康研究(HCHS)的数据收集过程,在汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心(UKE)进行。我们评估了如何将检查数据的记录从已建立的专有电子医疗记录(EHR)系统转换为免费使用的研究电子数据捕获(REDCap)软件。方法:为此,首先介绍了电子病历系统的技术改造。来自EHR系统的元文件用于REDCap电子病例报告表格(eCRF)的构建。REDCap系统由HCHS的学习助理通过完成模仿他们日常学习生活的自主开发任务来测试。可用性通过IBM计算机系统可用性问卷(CSUQ)进行定量评估,并通过半结构化访谈进行定性评估。结果:使用IBM CSUQ,研究助理对基本REDCap系统用于HCHS检查数据收集的使用情况进行了评分,总分为4.39分,代表中等接受度。访谈反馈用于制定用户故事,以随后增加管理主权,并概念化REDCap HCHS信息技术(IT)基础设施。结论:我们的工作旨在作为评估大型临床研究(如HCHS)从专有到免费使用数据收集工具转换的可行性的模板。REDCap有很大的潜力,但是需要扩展和集成到当前的IT基础设施中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating REDCap as the Central Data Collection Tool for the Hamburg City Health Study.

Introduction: The collection of examination data for large clinical studies is often done with proprietary systems, which are accompanied by several disadvantages such as high cost and low flexibility. With the use of open-source tools, these disadvantages can be overcome and thereby improve data collection as well as data quality. Here we exemplary use the data collection process of the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS), carried out at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). We evaluated how the recording of the examination data can be converted from an established, proprietary electronic healthcare record (EHR) system to the free-to-use Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software.

Methods: For this purpose, a technical conversion of the EHR system is described first. Metafiles derived from the EHR system were used for REDCap electronic case report form (eCRF) building. The REDCap system was tested by HCHS study assistants via completion of self-developed tasks mimicking their everyday study life. Usability was quantitatively evaluated via the IBM Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) and qualitatively assessed with a semi-structured interview.

Results: With the IBM CSUQ, the study assistants rated the usage of the basic REDCap system for HCHS examination data collection with an overall score of 4.39, which represents a medium acceptance. The interview feedback was used to formulate user stories to subsequently increase the administrative sovereignty and to conceptualize a REDCap HCHS information technology (IT) infrastructure.

Conclusion: Our work aims to serve as a template for evaluating the feasibility of a conversion from a proprietary to a free-to-use data collection tool for large clinical studies such as the HCHS. REDCap has great potential, but extensions and an integration to the current IT infrastructure are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1463
期刊介绍: This book series was started in 1990 to promote research conducted under the auspices of the EC programmes’ Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM) and Biomedical and Health Research (BHR) bioengineering branch. A driving aspect of international health informatics is that telecommunication technology, rehabilitative technology, intelligent home technology and many other components are moving together and form one integrated world of information and communication media.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Assessment Reveals Myopic Regression After ICL Implantation in High Myopia. Construction of Guideline-Based Decision Tree for Medication Recommendation. Systemic Risk Management Plan for Electronic Medical Records (EMR): Why and How? Mental Health Patient Portals Aimed at Depression: A Picture Close to Reality. Mettertron - Bridging Metadata Repositories and Terminology Servers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1