反对变态教师论的非洲道德方法:非洲的乌卡马、偏袒和同性恋恐惧症。

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Developing World Bioethics Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12419
Luis Cordeiro-Rodrigues
{"title":"反对变态教师论的非洲道德方法:非洲的乌卡马、偏袒和同性恋恐惧症。","authors":"Luis Cordeiro-Rodrigues","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Africa, homosexuality is routinely understood as a form of immoral behaviour. This has great implications for the physical and psychological well-being of homosexuals in Africa. One of the reasons why homosexuals are sometimes understood to be behaving immorally is because it is believed that same-sex relations are unnatural. I think that this conception of unnatural is grounded on the perverted faculty argument, although this is not often expressed in such terms. In this article, I will develop a concept of natural grounded on the concept of <i>Ukama</i>. I will show that despite <i>Ukama</i> implying a functional conception of nature, just like in the perverted faculty argument, it does not imply that homosexuality is immoral.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":"24 3","pages":"192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An African moral approach against the perverted faculty argument: Ukama, partiality and homophobia in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Luis Cordeiro-Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dewb.12419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Africa, homosexuality is routinely understood as a form of immoral behaviour. This has great implications for the physical and psychological well-being of homosexuals in Africa. One of the reasons why homosexuals are sometimes understood to be behaving immorally is because it is believed that same-sex relations are unnatural. I think that this conception of unnatural is grounded on the perverted faculty argument, although this is not often expressed in such terms. In this article, I will develop a concept of natural grounded on the concept of <i>Ukama</i>. I will show that despite <i>Ukama</i> implying a functional conception of nature, just like in the perverted faculty argument, it does not imply that homosexuality is immoral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developing World Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"192-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developing World Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12419\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing World Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非洲,同性恋通常被理解为一种不道德行为。这对非洲同性恋者的身心健康有很大影响。同性恋者有时被理解为行为不道德的原因之一是,人们认为同性关系是不自然的。我认为,这种不自然的概念是以变态的能力论点为基础的,尽管这种论点并不经常以这种方式表达出来。在本文中,我将以 Ukama 概念为基础发展自然概念。我将说明,尽管乌卡马意味着一种功能性的自然概念,就像在变态能力论证中一样,但它并不意味着同性恋是不道德的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An African moral approach against the perverted faculty argument: Ukama, partiality and homophobia in Africa

In Africa, homosexuality is routinely understood as a form of immoral behaviour. This has great implications for the physical and psychological well-being of homosexuals in Africa. One of the reasons why homosexuals are sometimes understood to be behaving immorally is because it is believed that same-sex relations are unnatural. I think that this conception of unnatural is grounded on the perverted faculty argument, although this is not often expressed in such terms. In this article, I will develop a concept of natural grounded on the concept of Ukama. I will show that despite Ukama implying a functional conception of nature, just like in the perverted faculty argument, it does not imply that homosexuality is immoral.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developing World Bioethics
Developing World Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developing World Bioethics provides long needed case studies, teaching materials, news in brief, and legal backgrounds to bioethics scholars and students in developing and developed countries alike. This companion journal to Bioethics also features high-quality peer reviewed original articles. It is edited by well-known bioethicists who are working in developing countries, yet it will also be open to contributions and commentary from developed countries'' authors. Developing World Bioethics is the only journal in the field dedicated exclusively to developing countries'' bioethics issues. The journal is an essential resource for all those concerned about bioethical issues in the developing world. Members of Ethics Committees in developing countries will highly value a special section dedicated to their work.
期刊最新文献
Medical ethics on research-related organ donation and transplantation in China. Dual-use research assessment in emerging medical biotechnology: An ethical perspective from China. Issue Information THANK YOU TO DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS REVIEWERS Feasibility of implementing the elective oocyte cryopreservation in China: A case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1