在美国遵守HIV暴露前预防检测指南。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES AIDS patient care and STDs Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1089/apc.2023.0062
Carter D McCormick, Patrick S Sullivan, Dima M Qato, Stephanie Y Crawford, Glen T Schumock, Todd A Lee
{"title":"在美国遵守HIV暴露前预防检测指南。","authors":"Carter D McCormick,&nbsp;Patrick S Sullivan,&nbsp;Dima M Qato,&nbsp;Stephanie Y Crawford,&nbsp;Glen T Schumock,&nbsp;Todd A Lee","doi":"10.1089/apc.2023.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testing guidelines for initiation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been developed to ensure appropriate use of PrEP, such as among those with renal dysfunction or at high risk of seroconversion. While many studies have looked at the trends of use of PrEP in the United States, little is known about compliance with these guidelines, the quality of care of PrEP at a national level, or what provider-level factors are associated with high-quality care. We conducted a retrospective claims analysis of providers of commercially insured new users of PrEP between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Of the 4200 providers, quality of care was low, with only 6.4% having claims for ≥60% of guideline-recommended testing for their patients in the testing window for all visits. More than half of the providers did not have claims for HIV testing at initiation of PrEP and ≥40% did not for sexually transmitted infections at both initiation and follow-up visits. Even when extending the testing window, quality of care remained low. Logistic regression models found no association between provider type and high quality of care, but did find that providers with one PrEP patient were more likely to have higher quality of care than those with multiple patients for all tests [adjusted odds ratio 0.47 (95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.67)]. The study findings suggest further training and interventions, such as integrated test ordering through electronic health records, are needed to increase quality of care for PrEP and ensure appropriate monitoring of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7476,"journal":{"name":"AIDS patient care and STDs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Testing Guidelines in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Carter D McCormick,&nbsp;Patrick S Sullivan,&nbsp;Dima M Qato,&nbsp;Stephanie Y Crawford,&nbsp;Glen T Schumock,&nbsp;Todd A Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apc.2023.0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Testing guidelines for initiation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been developed to ensure appropriate use of PrEP, such as among those with renal dysfunction or at high risk of seroconversion. While many studies have looked at the trends of use of PrEP in the United States, little is known about compliance with these guidelines, the quality of care of PrEP at a national level, or what provider-level factors are associated with high-quality care. We conducted a retrospective claims analysis of providers of commercially insured new users of PrEP between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Of the 4200 providers, quality of care was low, with only 6.4% having claims for ≥60% of guideline-recommended testing for their patients in the testing window for all visits. More than half of the providers did not have claims for HIV testing at initiation of PrEP and ≥40% did not for sexually transmitted infections at both initiation and follow-up visits. Even when extending the testing window, quality of care remained low. Logistic regression models found no association between provider type and high quality of care, but did find that providers with one PrEP patient were more likely to have higher quality of care than those with multiple patients for all tests [adjusted odds ratio 0.47 (95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.67)]. The study findings suggest further training and interventions, such as integrated test ordering through electronic health records, are needed to increase quality of care for PrEP and ensure appropriate monitoring of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2023.0062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS patient care and STDs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2023.0062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经制定了针对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)开始进行暴露前预防(PrEP)的测试指南,以确保适当使用PrEP,例如在肾功能不全或血清转化高危人群中使用PrEP。虽然许多研究都关注了美国使用PrEP的趋势,但人们对这些指南的遵守情况、国家层面的PrEP护理质量,以及哪些提供者层面的因素与高质量的护理有关,知之甚少。我们对2011年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间商业保险PrEP新用户的提供者进行了回顾性索赔分析。在4200名提供者中,护理质量较低,只有6.4%的人声称在所有就诊的检测窗口中为患者进行了≥60%的指南推荐检测。超过一半的提供者在开始PrEP时没有要求进行艾滋病毒检测,≥40%的提供者在开始和随访时都没有要求进行性传播感染检测。即使延长了检测窗口期,护理质量仍然很低。Logistic回归模型未发现提供者类型与高质量护理之间存在关联,但确实发现,在所有测试中,有一名PrEP患者的提供者比有多名患者的提供者更有可能提供更高的护理质量[校正优势比0.47(95%置信区间:0.33-0.67)]。研究结果表明,需要进一步的培训和干预措施,例如通过电子健康记录进行综合测试订购,以提高PrEP的护理质量并确保对患者的适当监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adherence to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Testing Guidelines in the United States.

Testing guidelines for initiation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been developed to ensure appropriate use of PrEP, such as among those with renal dysfunction or at high risk of seroconversion. While many studies have looked at the trends of use of PrEP in the United States, little is known about compliance with these guidelines, the quality of care of PrEP at a national level, or what provider-level factors are associated with high-quality care. We conducted a retrospective claims analysis of providers of commercially insured new users of PrEP between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Of the 4200 providers, quality of care was low, with only 6.4% having claims for ≥60% of guideline-recommended testing for their patients in the testing window for all visits. More than half of the providers did not have claims for HIV testing at initiation of PrEP and ≥40% did not for sexually transmitted infections at both initiation and follow-up visits. Even when extending the testing window, quality of care remained low. Logistic regression models found no association between provider type and high quality of care, but did find that providers with one PrEP patient were more likely to have higher quality of care than those with multiple patients for all tests [adjusted odds ratio 0.47 (95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.67)]. The study findings suggest further training and interventions, such as integrated test ordering through electronic health records, are needed to increase quality of care for PrEP and ensure appropriate monitoring of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS patient care and STDs
AIDS patient care and STDs 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
22.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Patient Care and STDs is the foremost journal providing the latest developments and research in diagnostics and therapeutics designed to prolong the lifespan and improve quality of life for HIV/AIDS patients. The Journal delivers cutting-edge clinical, basic science, sociologic, and behavior-based investigations in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Clinical trials, quantitative and qualitative analyses of pilot studies, comprehensive reviews, and case reports are presented from leading experts and scientists around the world. AIDS Patient Care and STDs coverage includes: Prominent AIDS medications, therapies, and antiretroviral agents HIV/AIDS-related diseases, infections, and complications Challenges of medication adherence Current prevention techniques for HIV The latest news and developments on other STDs Treatment/prevention options, including pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Attitudes About HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Sexually Active Black and Latina Cisgender Women: Findings from the 2017 and 2018 New York City Sexual Health Survey. A6 HIV Subtype in a Pharmacist-Directed Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine Screening Protocol. "AIDS at a Crossroads:" Highlights from the 2024 UNAIDS Report. Sexual Health of Young Adults Living with Perinatally Acquired HIV in Paris, France: A Qualitative Study. The Impact of Stigma on Self-Management Behavior Among People with HIV in China: The Role of Social Support and Self-Esteem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1