使用数字射线照相系统对不同类型树脂修复材料的辐射能力评估。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6
Ceyda Gündoğdu, Sinem Akgül
{"title":"使用数字射线照相系统对不同类型树脂修复材料的辐射能力评估。","authors":"Ceyda Gündoğdu,&nbsp;Sinem Akgül","doi":"10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the radiopacity of 20 current dental resin composites with digital radiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten specimens, 10-mm in diameter and 1-mm thickness, were prepared and radiographed using phosphor plates close to Al step wedges and tooth sections. The mean grey values (MGVs) were measured using an ImageJ software program and converted to equivalent Al thickness. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane post hoc test (p < 0.05). Correlation between mean radiopacity and filler content (wt% and vol%) of the tested materials was analyzed with linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiopacity of all composites ranged from 1.32 mm Al (Estellite Flow Quick) to 3.41 mm Al (Charisma Classic). All the tested materials, except four restorative materials, had a radiopacity equal or higher than the enamel (p < 0.05). Linear regression revealed low correlation between the radiopacity and filler content of the composite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of the materials has appropriate radiopacity for dental restorations. There was great variation in radiopacity level, may clinically affect the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiopacity evaluation of different types of resin restorative materials using a digital radiography system.\",\"authors\":\"Ceyda Gündoğdu,&nbsp;Sinem Akgül\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the radiopacity of 20 current dental resin composites with digital radiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten specimens, 10-mm in diameter and 1-mm thickness, were prepared and radiographed using phosphor plates close to Al step wedges and tooth sections. The mean grey values (MGVs) were measured using an ImageJ software program and converted to equivalent Al thickness. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane post hoc test (p < 0.05). Correlation between mean radiopacity and filler content (wt% and vol%) of the tested materials was analyzed with linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiopacity of all composites ranged from 1.32 mm Al (Estellite Flow Quick) to 3.41 mm Al (Charisma Classic). All the tested materials, except four restorative materials, had a radiopacity equal or higher than the enamel (p < 0.05). Linear regression revealed low correlation between the radiopacity and filler content of the composite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of the materials has appropriate radiopacity for dental restorations. There was great variation in radiopacity level, may clinically affect the diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较20种现有牙科树脂复合材料与数字射线照相术的放射性。方法:制备10个直径为10mm、厚度为1mm的标本,并使用靠近Al阶梯楔和牙齿切片的荧光板进行射线照相。使用ImageJ软件程序测量平均灰度值(MGV),并将其转换为等效Al厚度。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tamhane事后检验对数据进行分析(p 结果:所有复合材料的辐射不透性范围从1.32mm Al(Estellite Flow Quick)到3.41mm Al(Charisma Classic)。除四种修复材料外,所有受试材料的辐射不透性均等于或高于牙釉质(p 结论:大多数材料具有合适的放射性,可用于口腔修复。放射性水平变化较大,可能影响临床诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiopacity evaluation of different types of resin restorative materials using a digital radiography system.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the radiopacity of 20 current dental resin composites with digital radiography.

Methods: Ten specimens, 10-mm in diameter and 1-mm thickness, were prepared and radiographed using phosphor plates close to Al step wedges and tooth sections. The mean grey values (MGVs) were measured using an ImageJ software program and converted to equivalent Al thickness. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane post hoc test (p < 0.05). Correlation between mean radiopacity and filler content (wt% and vol%) of the tested materials was analyzed with linear regression analysis.

Results: The radiopacity of all composites ranged from 1.32 mm Al (Estellite Flow Quick) to 3.41 mm Al (Charisma Classic). All the tested materials, except four restorative materials, had a radiopacity equal or higher than the enamel (p < 0.05). Linear regression revealed low correlation between the radiopacity and filler content of the composite.

Conclusion: Majority of the materials has appropriate radiopacity for dental restorations. There was great variation in radiopacity level, may clinically affect the diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Style harmonization of panoramic radiography using deep learning. Evaluation of root canal filling length on periapical radiograph using artificial intelligence. Combined external radiotherapy and single-fraction palliative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for a patient with a base of tongue cancer who had a previous radiation history. Effect of metallic materials on magnetic resonance image uniformity: a quantitative experimental study. Acceptability of artificial intelligence in dental radiology among patients in India: are we ready for this revolution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1