Seth Talyansky, Yann Le Guen, Nandita Kasireddy, Michael E Belloy, Michael D Greicius
{"title":"ε4和BIN1增加阿尔茨海默病病理学的风险,但不是路易体病理学的特异性风险。","authors":"Seth Talyansky, Yann Le Guen, Nandita Kasireddy, Michael E Belloy, Michael D Greicius","doi":"10.1186/s40478-023-01626-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lewy body (LB) pathology commonly occurs in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, it remains unclear which genetic risk factors underlie AD pathology, LB pathology, or AD-LB co-pathology. Notably, whether APOE-ε4 affects risk of LB pathology independently from AD pathology is controversial. We adapted criteria from the literature to classify 4,985 subjects from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Rush University Medical Center as AD-LB co-pathology (AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup>), sole AD pathology (AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>), sole LB pathology (AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>+</sup>), or no pathology (AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>). We performed a meta-analysis of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) per subpopulation (NACC/Rush) for each disease phenotype compared to the control group (AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>), and compared the AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> to AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup> groups. APOE-ε4 was significantly associated with risk of AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup> and AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> compared to AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>. However, APOE-ε4 was not associated with risk of AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> compared to AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup> or risk of AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> compared to AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>. Associations at the BIN1 locus exhibited qualitatively similar results. These results suggest that APOE-ε4 is a risk factor for AD pathology, but not for LB pathology when decoupled from AD pathology. The same holds for BIN1 risk variants. These findings, in the largest AD-LB neuropathology GWAS to date, distinguish the genetic risk factors for sole and dual AD-LB pathology phenotypes. Our GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics, derived from phenotypes based on postmortem pathologic evaluation, may provide more accurate disease-specific polygenic risk scores compared to GWAS based on clinical diagnoses, which are likely confounded by undetected dual pathology and clinical misdiagnoses of dementia type.</p>","PeriodicalId":6914,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropathologica Communications","volume":"11 1","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APOE-ε4 and BIN1 increase risk of Alzheimer's disease pathology but not specifically of Lewy body pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Seth Talyansky, Yann Le Guen, Nandita Kasireddy, Michael E Belloy, Michael D Greicius\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40478-023-01626-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lewy body (LB) pathology commonly occurs in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, it remains unclear which genetic risk factors underlie AD pathology, LB pathology, or AD-LB co-pathology. Notably, whether APOE-ε4 affects risk of LB pathology independently from AD pathology is controversial. We adapted criteria from the literature to classify 4,985 subjects from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Rush University Medical Center as AD-LB co-pathology (AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup>), sole AD pathology (AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>), sole LB pathology (AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>+</sup>), or no pathology (AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>). We performed a meta-analysis of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) per subpopulation (NACC/Rush) for each disease phenotype compared to the control group (AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>), and compared the AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> to AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup> groups. APOE-ε4 was significantly associated with risk of AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup> and AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> compared to AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>. However, APOE-ε4 was not associated with risk of AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> compared to AD<sup>-</sup>LB<sup>-</sup> or risk of AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>+</sup> compared to AD<sup>+</sup>LB<sup>-</sup>. Associations at the BIN1 locus exhibited qualitatively similar results. These results suggest that APOE-ε4 is a risk factor for AD pathology, but not for LB pathology when decoupled from AD pathology. The same holds for BIN1 risk variants. These findings, in the largest AD-LB neuropathology GWAS to date, distinguish the genetic risk factors for sole and dual AD-LB pathology phenotypes. Our GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics, derived from phenotypes based on postmortem pathologic evaluation, may provide more accurate disease-specific polygenic risk scores compared to GWAS based on clinical diagnoses, which are likely confounded by undetected dual pathology and clinical misdiagnoses of dementia type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropathologica Communications\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropathologica Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01626-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropathologica Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01626-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
APOE-ε4 and BIN1 increase risk of Alzheimer's disease pathology but not specifically of Lewy body pathology.
Lewy body (LB) pathology commonly occurs in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, it remains unclear which genetic risk factors underlie AD pathology, LB pathology, or AD-LB co-pathology. Notably, whether APOE-ε4 affects risk of LB pathology independently from AD pathology is controversial. We adapted criteria from the literature to classify 4,985 subjects from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Rush University Medical Center as AD-LB co-pathology (AD+LB+), sole AD pathology (AD+LB-), sole LB pathology (AD-LB+), or no pathology (AD-LB-). We performed a meta-analysis of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) per subpopulation (NACC/Rush) for each disease phenotype compared to the control group (AD-LB-), and compared the AD+LB+ to AD+LB- groups. APOE-ε4 was significantly associated with risk of AD+LB- and AD+LB+ compared to AD-LB-. However, APOE-ε4 was not associated with risk of AD-LB+ compared to AD-LB- or risk of AD+LB+ compared to AD+LB-. Associations at the BIN1 locus exhibited qualitatively similar results. These results suggest that APOE-ε4 is a risk factor for AD pathology, but not for LB pathology when decoupled from AD pathology. The same holds for BIN1 risk variants. These findings, in the largest AD-LB neuropathology GWAS to date, distinguish the genetic risk factors for sole and dual AD-LB pathology phenotypes. Our GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics, derived from phenotypes based on postmortem pathologic evaluation, may provide more accurate disease-specific polygenic risk scores compared to GWAS based on clinical diagnoses, which are likely confounded by undetected dual pathology and clinical misdiagnoses of dementia type.
期刊介绍:
"Acta Neuropathologica Communications (ANC)" is a peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the rapid publication of research articles focused on the mechanisms underlying neurological diseases. The journal emphasizes the use of molecular, cellular, and morphological techniques applied to experimental or human tissues to investigate the pathogenesis of neurological disorders.
ANC is committed to a fast-track publication process, aiming to publish accepted manuscripts within two months of submission. This expedited timeline is designed to ensure that the latest findings in neuroscience and pathology are disseminated quickly to the scientific community, fostering rapid advancements in the field of neurology and neuroscience. The journal's focus on cutting-edge research and its swift publication schedule make it a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and other professionals interested in the study and treatment of neurological conditions.