Nathan Jasperse, Oscar Hernandez-Dominguez, Jacob S Deyell, Janani P Prasad, Charlene Yuan, Meril Tomy, Catherine M Kuza, Areg Grigorian, Jeffry Nahmias
{"title":"单一机构对女性患者引入外尿收集装置后的前后比较。","authors":"Nathan Jasperse, Oscar Hernandez-Dominguez, Jacob S Deyell, Janani P Prasad, Charlene Yuan, Meril Tomy, Catherine M Kuza, Areg Grigorian, Jeffry Nahmias","doi":"10.1177/17571774211060423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may serve as an alternative to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) and decrease the rate of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). <i>PureWick®</i> is a novel female EUCD; however, no study has definitively proven benefit regarding reduction of CAUTIs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to compare the CAUTI rate and IUC days before and after availability of the <i>PureWick®</i> EUCD at a single institution. We provide a descriptive analysis of female medical patients receiving an EUCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of adult female patients admitted to a single institution on a medical service who received an IUC and/or an EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC in the 3 months before EUCD availability (PRE) were compared to patients who received an IUC and/or EUCD in the 12 months after (POST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 848 female patients, 292 received an EUCD in the POST cohort and overall, 656 received an IUC (259 (100%) PRE vs. 397 (67.4%) POST). Compared to the PRE cohort, the POST cohort had a higher number of IUC days (median, 3 vs 2 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a higher rate of CAUTI (infections per 1000 catheter days, 9.3 vs 2.3, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The rate of UTI associated with EUCD use was 9.8 infections per 1000 device days.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While EUCDs might appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female patients, this single center pre-/post-analysis found that both the number of IUC days and the CAUTI rate increased after introduction of a female EUCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"23 4","pages":"149-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226054/pdf/10.1177_17571774211060423.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A single institution pre-/post-comparison after introduction of an external urinary collection device for female medical patients.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Jasperse, Oscar Hernandez-Dominguez, Jacob S Deyell, Janani P Prasad, Charlene Yuan, Meril Tomy, Catherine M Kuza, Areg Grigorian, Jeffry Nahmias\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17571774211060423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may serve as an alternative to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) and decrease the rate of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). <i>PureWick®</i> is a novel female EUCD; however, no study has definitively proven benefit regarding reduction of CAUTIs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to compare the CAUTI rate and IUC days before and after availability of the <i>PureWick®</i> EUCD at a single institution. We provide a descriptive analysis of female medical patients receiving an EUCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of adult female patients admitted to a single institution on a medical service who received an IUC and/or an EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC in the 3 months before EUCD availability (PRE) were compared to patients who received an IUC and/or EUCD in the 12 months after (POST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 848 female patients, 292 received an EUCD in the POST cohort and overall, 656 received an IUC (259 (100%) PRE vs. 397 (67.4%) POST). Compared to the PRE cohort, the POST cohort had a higher number of IUC days (median, 3 vs 2 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a higher rate of CAUTI (infections per 1000 catheter days, 9.3 vs 2.3, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The rate of UTI associated with EUCD use was 9.8 infections per 1000 device days.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While EUCDs might appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female patients, this single center pre-/post-analysis found that both the number of IUC days and the CAUTI rate increased after introduction of a female EUCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection Prevention\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"149-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226054/pdf/10.1177_17571774211060423.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774211060423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774211060423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:体外尿收集装置(EUCDs)可以作为留置导尿管(IUCs)的替代方案,降低导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTIs)的发生率。PureWick®是一种新颖的女性EUCD;然而,没有研究明确证明减少CAUTIs的益处。目的:我们试图比较PureWick®EUCD在单一机构可用前后的CAUTI率和IUC。我们提供了一个描述性分析的女性医疗患者接受EUCD。方法:对同一医疗机构接受IUC和/或EUCD的成年女性患者进行回顾性分析。在EUCD可用前3个月接受IUC的患者(PRE)与在EUCD可用后12个月接受IUC和/或EUCD的患者(POST)进行比较。结果:在848例女性患者中,292例在POST队列中接受了EUCD,总体而言,656例接受了IUC(259例(100%)PRE vs 397例(67.4%)POST)。与PRE队列相比,POST队列具有更高的IUC天数(中位数,3 vs 2天,p = 0.001)和更高的CAUTI发生率(每1000个导管天感染,9.3 vs 2.3, p = 0.001)。与EUCD使用相关的UTI发生率为每1000个设备日9.8例感染。讨论:虽然EUCD似乎是女性患者宫内节育器的一个有希望的替代方案,但本单中心前/后分析发现,引入女性EUCD后,宫内节育器的天数和CAUTI发生率均有所增加。
A single institution pre-/post-comparison after introduction of an external urinary collection device for female medical patients.
Background: External urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may serve as an alternative to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) and decrease the rate of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). PureWick® is a novel female EUCD; however, no study has definitively proven benefit regarding reduction of CAUTIs.
Aim: We sought to compare the CAUTI rate and IUC days before and after availability of the PureWick® EUCD at a single institution. We provide a descriptive analysis of female medical patients receiving an EUCD.
Methods: A retrospective review of adult female patients admitted to a single institution on a medical service who received an IUC and/or an EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC in the 3 months before EUCD availability (PRE) were compared to patients who received an IUC and/or EUCD in the 12 months after (POST).
Results: Out of 848 female patients, 292 received an EUCD in the POST cohort and overall, 656 received an IUC (259 (100%) PRE vs. 397 (67.4%) POST). Compared to the PRE cohort, the POST cohort had a higher number of IUC days (median, 3 vs 2 days, p = 0.001) and a higher rate of CAUTI (infections per 1000 catheter days, 9.3 vs 2.3, p = 0.001). The rate of UTI associated with EUCD use was 9.8 infections per 1000 device days.
Discussion: While EUCDs might appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female patients, this single center pre-/post-analysis found that both the number of IUC days and the CAUTI rate increased after introduction of a female EUCD.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects