密歇根玉米地植物寄生线虫的分布。

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Journal of nematology Pub Date : 2023-05-02 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0015
Sita Thapa, Elisabeth Darling, Emilie Cole, Kristin Poley, Marisol Quintanilla
{"title":"密歇根玉米地植物寄生线虫的分布。","authors":"Sita Thapa, Elisabeth Darling, Emilie Cole, Kristin Poley, Marisol Quintanilla","doi":"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) can cause substantial economic yield losses to many agronomic crops in the United States. A regional-scale survey was completed across 20 counties to determine PPNs prevalence in Michigan corn and how factors such as soil type, tillage, irrigation, and cropping systems influence their distribution. Ten different major genera of PPNs were identified in Michigan corn fields: <i>Longidorus</i> (needle), <i>Helicotylenchus</i> (spiral), <i>Pratylenchus</i> (lesion), <i>Meloidogyne</i> (root-knot), <i>Heterodera</i> (cyst), <i>Hoplolaimus</i> (lance), <i>Tylenchorhynchus</i> or <i>Merlinius</i> (stunt), <i>Paratylenchus</i> (pin), <i>Criconemella</i> (ring), and <i>Xiphinema</i> (dagger). No significant differences among different categories of tillage for lesion, stunt, or needle nematode prevalence was detected. Lesion nematodes were most prevalent in muck soil, while stunt nematode prevalence was significantly affected by the soil type. Needle nematodes were least abundant in irrigated soils and in contrast, stunt nematodes were higher in non-irrigated soils. Spiral nematodes were the most common PPNs in Michigan corn in all cropping systems. These findings will be helpful in planning future nematode studies in Michigan and in developing and evaluating corn nematode management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nematology","volume":"55 1","pages":"20230015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Michigan Corn Fields.\",\"authors\":\"Sita Thapa, Elisabeth Darling, Emilie Cole, Kristin Poley, Marisol Quintanilla\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) can cause substantial economic yield losses to many agronomic crops in the United States. A regional-scale survey was completed across 20 counties to determine PPNs prevalence in Michigan corn and how factors such as soil type, tillage, irrigation, and cropping systems influence their distribution. Ten different major genera of PPNs were identified in Michigan corn fields: <i>Longidorus</i> (needle), <i>Helicotylenchus</i> (spiral), <i>Pratylenchus</i> (lesion), <i>Meloidogyne</i> (root-knot), <i>Heterodera</i> (cyst), <i>Hoplolaimus</i> (lance), <i>Tylenchorhynchus</i> or <i>Merlinius</i> (stunt), <i>Paratylenchus</i> (pin), <i>Criconemella</i> (ring), and <i>Xiphinema</i> (dagger). No significant differences among different categories of tillage for lesion, stunt, or needle nematode prevalence was detected. Lesion nematodes were most prevalent in muck soil, while stunt nematode prevalence was significantly affected by the soil type. Needle nematodes were least abundant in irrigated soils and in contrast, stunt nematodes were higher in non-irrigated soils. Spiral nematodes were the most common PPNs in Michigan corn in all cropping systems. These findings will be helpful in planning future nematode studies in Michigan and in developing and evaluating corn nematode management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nematology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"20230015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nematology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物寄生线虫(PPNs)会对美国的许多农业作物造成巨大的经济产量损失。在20个县完成了一项区域规模的调查,以确定密歇根州玉米中PPN的流行率,以及土壤类型、耕作、灌溉和种植制度等因素如何影响其分布。在密歇根玉米地中鉴定出10个不同的PPN主要属:Longidorus(针)、Helicotylenchus(螺旋)、Pratylenchus(病变)、Meloidogyne(根结)、Heterodera(囊肿)、Hoplolaimus(矛)、Tylenchorhynchus或Merlinius(特技)、Paratylenchus、Criconemella(环)和Xiphinema(匕首)。在不同类型的耕作中,没有发现损伤、矮化或针线虫患病率的显著差异。病害线虫在渣土中最为普遍,而矮秆线虫的流行受土壤类型的显著影响。针线虫在灌溉土壤中含量最低,而在非灌溉土壤中,矮生线虫含量较高。螺旋线虫是所有种植系统中密歇根玉米中最常见的PPN。这些发现将有助于规划密歇根州未来的线虫研究,以及制定和评估玉米线虫管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Michigan Corn Fields.

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) can cause substantial economic yield losses to many agronomic crops in the United States. A regional-scale survey was completed across 20 counties to determine PPNs prevalence in Michigan corn and how factors such as soil type, tillage, irrigation, and cropping systems influence their distribution. Ten different major genera of PPNs were identified in Michigan corn fields: Longidorus (needle), Helicotylenchus (spiral), Pratylenchus (lesion), Meloidogyne (root-knot), Heterodera (cyst), Hoplolaimus (lance), Tylenchorhynchus or Merlinius (stunt), Paratylenchus (pin), Criconemella (ring), and Xiphinema (dagger). No significant differences among different categories of tillage for lesion, stunt, or needle nematode prevalence was detected. Lesion nematodes were most prevalent in muck soil, while stunt nematode prevalence was significantly affected by the soil type. Needle nematodes were least abundant in irrigated soils and in contrast, stunt nematodes were higher in non-irrigated soils. Spiral nematodes were the most common PPNs in Michigan corn in all cropping systems. These findings will be helpful in planning future nematode studies in Michigan and in developing and evaluating corn nematode management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nematology
Journal of nematology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nematology is the official technical and scientific communication publication of the Society of Nematologists since 1969. The journal publishes original papers on all aspects of basic, applied, descriptive, theoretical or experimental nematology and adheres to strict peer-review policy. Other categories of papers include invited reviews, research notes, abstracts of papers presented at annual meetings, and special publications as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Meloidogyne marylandi is Involved in, but not the Primary Cause of Creeping Bentgrass Decline of Putting Greens in Southern California. Population Dynamics of Mesocriconema xenoplax Parasitizing Sweet Cherry Trees in British Columbia, Canada. The Rate of Decline of Sugarbeet Cyst Nematode in Central California Under Nonhost Crops May Impact Biofuel Production. Description of Panagrolaimus namibiensis n. sp. (Rhabditida: Panagrolaimidae), an Anhydrobiotic Nematode from the Namib Desert of Namibia. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Meloidogyne arenaria () Populations Parasitizing Pistachio in Kerman and Khorasan Razavi Provinces, Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1