{"title":"红皮病银屑病的全身单药治疗:81例回顾性研究的结果。","authors":"Chenyang Yu, Chao Wu, Yuyan Yang, Hongzhong Jin","doi":"10.1177/20406223231178412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) remains challenging to manage because it is rare and has complex complications. Although acitretin is recommended as an appropriate choice for EP, there is a lack of large-scale evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of acitretin as systemic monotherapy in EP patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with EP who received at least 3 months of acitretin as systemic monotherapy during hospitalization and out-patient follow-up from January 2005 to May 2021 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The efficacy was clinically evaluated after 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks of treatment, which was classified as a good response (>75% of lesions cleared), partial response (50%-75% cleared), moderate response (25-50% cleared), or no response (<25% cleared). Safety was assessed on the basis of physical examination results and significant changes in laboratory examination results after 12 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 81 patients (79.0% men; mean age, 47.9 years) were included. The acitretin dose ranged from 20 to 60 mg/day (0.3 to 0.8 mg/kg/day). The rates of good, partial, and moderate responses were 0.0%, 2.5%, and 42.0% at 1 week; 3.7%, 34.6%, and 61.7% at 2 weeks; 29.6%, 58.0%, and 12.4% at 4 weeks; and 85.2%, 13.6%, and 1.2% at 12 weeks after treatment initiation, respectively. EP patients transformed from psoriasis vulgaris showed a higher good/partial response rate compared with that of EP patients that developed from pustular or articular psoriasis (44.6% <i>vs.</i> 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Patients with concurrent infection showed a lower rate of good/partial response compared with that of those without concurrent infection (16.7% <i>vs.</i> 44.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Adverse effects were seen in 45 (55.6%) patients in 12 weeks, and dyslipidemia (<i>n</i> = 31; 38.3%), xerosis (<i>n</i> = 24; 29.6%), and elevated liver enzymes (<i>n</i> = 6; 7.4%) were most commonly reported. Twenty-three patients were followed up for over 3 years, and six (26.1%) patients had EP recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acitretin as a systemic monotherapy showed satisfactory effectiveness for EP, especially in patients developed from psoriasis vulgaris and without infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":"14 ","pages":"20406223231178412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/8b/10.1177_20406223231178412.PMC10286161.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic monotherapy with acitretin for erythrodermic psoriasis: results of a retrospective study of 81 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Chenyang Yu, Chao Wu, Yuyan Yang, Hongzhong Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406223231178412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) remains challenging to manage because it is rare and has complex complications. Although acitretin is recommended as an appropriate choice for EP, there is a lack of large-scale evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of acitretin as systemic monotherapy in EP patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with EP who received at least 3 months of acitretin as systemic monotherapy during hospitalization and out-patient follow-up from January 2005 to May 2021 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The efficacy was clinically evaluated after 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks of treatment, which was classified as a good response (>75% of lesions cleared), partial response (50%-75% cleared), moderate response (25-50% cleared), or no response (<25% cleared). Safety was assessed on the basis of physical examination results and significant changes in laboratory examination results after 12 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 81 patients (79.0% men; mean age, 47.9 years) were included. The acitretin dose ranged from 20 to 60 mg/day (0.3 to 0.8 mg/kg/day). The rates of good, partial, and moderate responses were 0.0%, 2.5%, and 42.0% at 1 week; 3.7%, 34.6%, and 61.7% at 2 weeks; 29.6%, 58.0%, and 12.4% at 4 weeks; and 85.2%, 13.6%, and 1.2% at 12 weeks after treatment initiation, respectively. EP patients transformed from psoriasis vulgaris showed a higher good/partial response rate compared with that of EP patients that developed from pustular or articular psoriasis (44.6% <i>vs.</i> 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Patients with concurrent infection showed a lower rate of good/partial response compared with that of those without concurrent infection (16.7% <i>vs.</i> 44.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Adverse effects were seen in 45 (55.6%) patients in 12 weeks, and dyslipidemia (<i>n</i> = 31; 38.3%), xerosis (<i>n</i> = 24; 29.6%), and elevated liver enzymes (<i>n</i> = 6; 7.4%) were most commonly reported. Twenty-three patients were followed up for over 3 years, and six (26.1%) patients had EP recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acitretin as a systemic monotherapy showed satisfactory effectiveness for EP, especially in patients developed from psoriasis vulgaris and without infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"20406223231178412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/8b/10.1177_20406223231178412.PMC10286161.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223231178412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223231178412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:红皮病性牛皮癣(EP)仍然具有挑战性,因为它是罕见的,有复杂的并发症。虽然阿维素被推荐为治疗EP的合适选择,但缺乏大规模的证据。目的:本研究旨在评估阿维a素作为全身单药治疗EP患者的有效性和安全性。设计:我们回顾性分析2005年1月至2021年5月在中国北京协和医院住院和门诊随访期间接受至少3个月阿维甲素系统性单药治疗的EP患者的数据。方法:在治疗1、2、4、12周后进行临床疗效评价,分为良好反应(>75%的病灶清除率)、部分反应(50% ~ 75%清除率)、中度反应(25 ~ 50%清除率)和无反应(结果:总体上,81例患者(79.0%男性;平均年龄47.9岁)。阿维素剂量为20 ~ 60mg /天(0.3 ~ 0.8 mg/kg/天)。1周时,良好、部分和中度缓解率分别为0.0%、2.5%和42.0%;2周时分别为3.7%、34.6%和61.7%;4周时分别为29.6%、58.0%和12.4%;治疗开始后12周,分别为85.2%、13.6%和1.2%。寻常型银屑病转化为EP患者的良好/部分缓解率高于脓疱型或关节型银屑病转化为EP患者(44.6% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.035)。并发感染患者的良好/部分缓解率低于未并发感染患者(16.7% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.049)。12周内出现不良反应45例(55.6%),血脂异常(n = 31;38.3%),干枯病(n = 24;29.6%),肝酶升高(n = 6;7.4%)最为常见。23例患者随访3年以上,EP复发6例(26.1%)。结论:阿维a作为系统性单药治疗EP的效果令人满意,特别是对于寻常型银屑病和无感染的患者。
Systemic monotherapy with acitretin for erythrodermic psoriasis: results of a retrospective study of 81 patients.
Background: Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) remains challenging to manage because it is rare and has complex complications. Although acitretin is recommended as an appropriate choice for EP, there is a lack of large-scale evidence.
Objectives: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of acitretin as systemic monotherapy in EP patients.
Design: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with EP who received at least 3 months of acitretin as systemic monotherapy during hospitalization and out-patient follow-up from January 2005 to May 2021 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China.
Methods: The efficacy was clinically evaluated after 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks of treatment, which was classified as a good response (>75% of lesions cleared), partial response (50%-75% cleared), moderate response (25-50% cleared), or no response (<25% cleared). Safety was assessed on the basis of physical examination results and significant changes in laboratory examination results after 12 weeks of treatment.
Results: Overall, 81 patients (79.0% men; mean age, 47.9 years) were included. The acitretin dose ranged from 20 to 60 mg/day (0.3 to 0.8 mg/kg/day). The rates of good, partial, and moderate responses were 0.0%, 2.5%, and 42.0% at 1 week; 3.7%, 34.6%, and 61.7% at 2 weeks; 29.6%, 58.0%, and 12.4% at 4 weeks; and 85.2%, 13.6%, and 1.2% at 12 weeks after treatment initiation, respectively. EP patients transformed from psoriasis vulgaris showed a higher good/partial response rate compared with that of EP patients that developed from pustular or articular psoriasis (44.6% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.035). Patients with concurrent infection showed a lower rate of good/partial response compared with that of those without concurrent infection (16.7% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.049). Adverse effects were seen in 45 (55.6%) patients in 12 weeks, and dyslipidemia (n = 31; 38.3%), xerosis (n = 24; 29.6%), and elevated liver enzymes (n = 6; 7.4%) were most commonly reported. Twenty-three patients were followed up for over 3 years, and six (26.1%) patients had EP recurrence.
Conclusions: Acitretin as a systemic monotherapy showed satisfactory effectiveness for EP, especially in patients developed from psoriasis vulgaris and without infection.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.