Vadim Mazurok, Igor Kasherininov, Andrey Bautin, Olga Kulemina, Ryta Rzheutskaya
{"title":"心脏外科术后患者心脏保护机械通气的应用。","authors":"Vadim Mazurok, Igor Kasherininov, Andrey Bautin, Olga Kulemina, Ryta Rzheutskaya","doi":"10.1155/2021/6617809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings-with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure-in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective interventional cohort study with a controlled group in a single cardiosurgical ICU involving 119 patients following on-pump CABG surgery. During the 1st postoperative hour, the intervention group patients were ventilated with Vt 10 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup>, RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (\"conventional ventilation\"). During the 2nd hour, RR was reduced to 8/min (\"reduced RR ventilation\"). At 3 hrs, Vt was decreased to 6 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup>, RR returned to 14/min, and PEEP increased to 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (\"low Vt-high PEEP ventilation\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the \"low Vt-high PEEP\" ventilation period showed significantly lower alveolar ventilation and thoraco-pulmonary compliance than during \"reduced RR\" ventilation. Mean airway pressure and Vds/Vt peaked during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation; however, driving pressure was lower. Vt decrease and PEEP increase did not lead to oxygenation improvement and worsened CO<sub>2</sub> elimination. Hemodynamically, the study revealed significant cardiac output decrease during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation. In 23.2% of patients, catecholamine therapy was initiated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In postoperative cardiosurgical patients, MV with Vt 6 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup> and PEEP 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O is characterized by worsened oxygenation and elimination of CO<sub>2</sub> and a less favorable hemodynamic profile than ventilation with Vt 10 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup> and PEEP 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. <i>New and Noteworthy</i>. (i) Patients after CABG may be especially sensitive to low tidal volume and increased PEEP as it negatively affects hemodynamic profile by means of the right heart preload decrease and afterload increase. (ii) Mechanical ventilation settings aiming to minimize mean airway pressure reduce the negative effects of positive inspiratory pressure and are favorable for hemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6617809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Vadim Mazurok, Igor Kasherininov, Andrey Bautin, Olga Kulemina, Ryta Rzheutskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6617809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings-with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure-in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective interventional cohort study with a controlled group in a single cardiosurgical ICU involving 119 patients following on-pump CABG surgery. During the 1st postoperative hour, the intervention group patients were ventilated with Vt 10 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup>, RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (\\\"conventional ventilation\\\"). During the 2nd hour, RR was reduced to 8/min (\\\"reduced RR ventilation\\\"). At 3 hrs, Vt was decreased to 6 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup>, RR returned to 14/min, and PEEP increased to 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (\\\"low Vt-high PEEP ventilation\\\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the \\\"low Vt-high PEEP\\\" ventilation period showed significantly lower alveolar ventilation and thoraco-pulmonary compliance than during \\\"reduced RR\\\" ventilation. Mean airway pressure and Vds/Vt peaked during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation; however, driving pressure was lower. Vt decrease and PEEP increase did not lead to oxygenation improvement and worsened CO<sub>2</sub> elimination. Hemodynamically, the study revealed significant cardiac output decrease during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation. In 23.2% of patients, catecholamine therapy was initiated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In postoperative cardiosurgical patients, MV with Vt 6 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup> and PEEP 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O is characterized by worsened oxygenation and elimination of CO<sub>2</sub> and a less favorable hemodynamic profile than ventilation with Vt 10 ml × kg<sup>-1</sup> and PEEP 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. <i>New and Noteworthy</i>. (i) Patients after CABG may be especially sensitive to low tidal volume and increased PEEP as it negatively affects hemodynamic profile by means of the right heart preload decrease and afterload increase. (ii) Mechanical ventilation settings aiming to minimize mean airway pressure reduce the negative effects of positive inspiratory pressure and are favorable for hemodynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"6617809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6617809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6617809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究比较了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者在几种不同呼吸机设置下的血流动力学效应和气体交换,包括潮汐量、呼吸速率和呼气末压力。方法:前瞻性介入队列研究,在单一心脏外科ICU进行对照组,包括119例无泵搭桥手术后的患者。术后1 h,干预组患者通气:Vt 10 ml × kg-1, RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH2O(“常规通气”)。在第2小时,RR降低到8/min(“降低RR通气”)。3 h时,Vt降至6 ml × kg-1, RR恢复至14/min, PEEP升高至10 cmH2O(“低Vt-高PEEP通气”)。结果:“低vt -高PEEP”通气期患者肺泡通气和胸肺顺应性明显低于“低RR”通气期。低正压-高正压通气时平均气道压和Vds/Vt达到峰值;然而,驾驶压力较低。Vt降低和PEEP升高并未导致氧合改善和CO2消除恶化。血流动力学方面,研究显示低伏-高PEEP通气时心输出量明显减少。23.2%的患者开始了儿茶酚胺治疗。结论:在心脏外科术后患者中,Vt为6 ml × kg-1、PEEP为10 cmH2O的通气患者与Vt为10 ml × kg-1、PEEP为5 cmH2O的通气患者相比,其氧合和CO2消除更差,血流动力学特征更差。新的和值得注意的。(i)冠状动脉搭桥后患者可能对低潮气量和PEEP升高特别敏感,因为它通过右心前负荷降低和后负荷增加对血流动力学特征产生负面影响。(ii)机械通气设置旨在最小化平均气道压力,减少正吸气压力的负面影响,有利于血流动力学。
Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients.
Background: This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings-with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure-in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: Prospective interventional cohort study with a controlled group in a single cardiosurgical ICU involving 119 patients following on-pump CABG surgery. During the 1st postoperative hour, the intervention group patients were ventilated with Vt 10 ml × kg-1, RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH2O ("conventional ventilation"). During the 2nd hour, RR was reduced to 8/min ("reduced RR ventilation"). At 3 hrs, Vt was decreased to 6 ml × kg-1, RR returned to 14/min, and PEEP increased to 10 cmH2O ("low Vt-high PEEP ventilation").
Results: Patients in the "low Vt-high PEEP" ventilation period showed significantly lower alveolar ventilation and thoraco-pulmonary compliance than during "reduced RR" ventilation. Mean airway pressure and Vds/Vt peaked during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation; however, driving pressure was lower. Vt decrease and PEEP increase did not lead to oxygenation improvement and worsened CO2 elimination. Hemodynamically, the study revealed significant cardiac output decrease during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation. In 23.2% of patients, catecholamine therapy was initiated.
Conclusions: In postoperative cardiosurgical patients, MV with Vt 6 ml × kg-1 and PEEP 10 cm H2O is characterized by worsened oxygenation and elimination of CO2 and a less favorable hemodynamic profile than ventilation with Vt 10 ml × kg-1 and PEEP 5 cmH2O. New and Noteworthy. (i) Patients after CABG may be especially sensitive to low tidal volume and increased PEEP as it negatively affects hemodynamic profile by means of the right heart preload decrease and afterload increase. (ii) Mechanical ventilation settings aiming to minimize mean airway pressure reduce the negative effects of positive inspiratory pressure and are favorable for hemodynamics.