需求工程教育的系统文献综述。

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Requirements Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9
Marian Daun, Alicia M Grubb, Viktoria Stenkova, Bastian Tenbergen
{"title":"需求工程教育的系统文献综述。","authors":"Marian Daun,&nbsp;Alicia M Grubb,&nbsp;Viktoria Stenkova,&nbsp;Bastian Tenbergen","doi":"10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Requirements engineering (RE) has established itself as a core software engineering discipline. It is well acknowledged that good RE leads to higher quality software and considerably reduces the risk of failure or budget-overspending of software development projects. It is of vital importance to train future software engineers in RE and educate future requirements engineers to adequately manage requirements in various projects. To this date, there exists no central concept of what RE education shall comprise. To lay a foundation, we report on a systematic literature review of the field and provide a systematic map describing the current state of RE education. Doing so allows us to describe how the educational landscape has changed over the last decade. Results show that only a few established author collaborations exist and that RE education research is predominantly published in venues other than the top RE research venues (i.e., in venues other than the RE conference and journal). Key trends in RE instruction of the past decade include involvement of real or realistic stakeholders, teaching predominantly elicitation as an RE activity, and increasing student factors such as motivation or communication skills. Finally, we discuss open opportunities in RE education, such as training for security requirements and supply chain risk management, as well as developing a pedagogical foundation grounded in evidence of effective instructional approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20912,"journal":{"name":"Requirements Engineering","volume":"28 2","pages":"145-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119682/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review of requirements engineering education.\",\"authors\":\"Marian Daun,&nbsp;Alicia M Grubb,&nbsp;Viktoria Stenkova,&nbsp;Bastian Tenbergen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Requirements engineering (RE) has established itself as a core software engineering discipline. It is well acknowledged that good RE leads to higher quality software and considerably reduces the risk of failure or budget-overspending of software development projects. It is of vital importance to train future software engineers in RE and educate future requirements engineers to adequately manage requirements in various projects. To this date, there exists no central concept of what RE education shall comprise. To lay a foundation, we report on a systematic literature review of the field and provide a systematic map describing the current state of RE education. Doing so allows us to describe how the educational landscape has changed over the last decade. Results show that only a few established author collaborations exist and that RE education research is predominantly published in venues other than the top RE research venues (i.e., in venues other than the RE conference and journal). Key trends in RE instruction of the past decade include involvement of real or realistic stakeholders, teaching predominantly elicitation as an RE activity, and increasing student factors such as motivation or communication skills. Finally, we discuss open opportunities in RE education, such as training for security requirements and supply chain risk management, as well as developing a pedagogical foundation grounded in evidence of effective instructional approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Requirements Engineering\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"145-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Requirements Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

需求工程(RE)已经确立了自己作为核心软件工程学科的地位。众所周知,良好的可再生资源会导致更高质量的软件,并大大降低软件开发项目失败或预算超支的风险。培养未来的软件工程师在可再生能源和教育未来的需求工程师充分管理各种项目的需求是至关重要的。到目前为止,还没有关于再教育应该包括什么的核心概念。为了奠定基础,我们报告了该领域的系统文献综述,并提供了描述RE教育现状的系统地图。这样做可以让我们描述过去十年教育环境的变化。结果表明,只有少数已建立的作者合作关系存在,并且可再生能源教育研究主要发表在顶级可再生能源研究场所以外的场所(即,在可再生能源会议和期刊以外的场所)。在过去十年中,可再生能源教学的主要趋势包括让真实的或现实的利益相关者参与进来,以启发为主的教学作为可再生能源活动,以及增加学生的动机或沟通技巧等因素。最后,我们讨论了可再生能源教育中的开放机会,例如安全需求和供应链风险管理的培训,以及基于有效教学方法的证据开发教学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic literature review of requirements engineering education.

Requirements engineering (RE) has established itself as a core software engineering discipline. It is well acknowledged that good RE leads to higher quality software and considerably reduces the risk of failure or budget-overspending of software development projects. It is of vital importance to train future software engineers in RE and educate future requirements engineers to adequately manage requirements in various projects. To this date, there exists no central concept of what RE education shall comprise. To lay a foundation, we report on a systematic literature review of the field and provide a systematic map describing the current state of RE education. Doing so allows us to describe how the educational landscape has changed over the last decade. Results show that only a few established author collaborations exist and that RE education research is predominantly published in venues other than the top RE research venues (i.e., in venues other than the RE conference and journal). Key trends in RE instruction of the past decade include involvement of real or realistic stakeholders, teaching predominantly elicitation as an RE activity, and increasing student factors such as motivation or communication skills. Finally, we discuss open opportunities in RE education, such as training for security requirements and supply chain risk management, as well as developing a pedagogical foundation grounded in evidence of effective instructional approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Requirements Engineering
Requirements Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal provides a focus for the dissemination of new results about the elicitation, representation and validation of requirements of software intensive information systems or applications. Theoretical and applied submissions are welcome, but all papers must explicitly address: -the practical consequences of the ideas for the design of complex systems -how the ideas should be evaluated by the reflective practitioner The journal is motivated by a multi-disciplinary view that considers requirements not only in terms of software components specification but also in terms of activities for their elicitation, representation and agreement, carried out within an organisational and social context. To this end, contributions are sought from fields such as software engineering, information systems, occupational sociology, cognitive and organisational psychology, human-computer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, linguistics and philosophy for work addressing specifically requirements engineering issues.
期刊最新文献
Why don’t we trace? A study on the barriers to software traceability in practice The role of informal communication in building shared understanding of non-functional requirements in remote continuous software engineering What do we know about requirements management in software ecosystems? On understanding and predicting issue links When details are difficult to portray: enriching vision videos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1