围棋棋手的认知反思与心理理论。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5709/acp-0322-6
Marc Olivier Rieger, Mei Wang
{"title":"围棋棋手的认知反思与心理理论。","authors":"Marc Olivier Rieger,&nbsp;Mei Wang","doi":"10.5709/acp-0322-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Go is a classical Chinese mind game and a highly popular intellectual pursuit in East Asia. In a survey at two Go tournaments (one of them the largest in Europe), we measured cognitive reflection and decision in strategic games (using the classical \"beauty contest\" game) (<i>N</i> = 327). We found that Go players in our survey had outstanding average cognitive reflection test (CRT) scores: 2.51 among all participants and 2.80 among players of high master level (dan). This value easily outperforms previous measurements, for example, of undergraduates at top universities. The CRT score was closely related to the playing strength, but not to the frequency of playing. On the other hand, frequent players tended to have higher theory of mind, regardless of their playing strengths. However, selfreported patience was not statistically significantly correlated with Go strength or playing frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":51754,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/25/acp-17-2-328.PMC10494937.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Reflection and Theory of Mind of Go Players.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Olivier Rieger,&nbsp;Mei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.5709/acp-0322-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Go is a classical Chinese mind game and a highly popular intellectual pursuit in East Asia. In a survey at two Go tournaments (one of them the largest in Europe), we measured cognitive reflection and decision in strategic games (using the classical \\\"beauty contest\\\" game) (<i>N</i> = 327). We found that Go players in our survey had outstanding average cognitive reflection test (CRT) scores: 2.51 among all participants and 2.80 among players of high master level (dan). This value easily outperforms previous measurements, for example, of undergraduates at top universities. The CRT score was closely related to the playing strength, but not to the frequency of playing. On the other hand, frequent players tended to have higher theory of mind, regardless of their playing strengths. However, selfreported patience was not statistically significantly correlated with Go strength or playing frequency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/25/acp-17-2-328.PMC10494937.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0322-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0322-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围棋是一种中国古典的智力游戏,在东亚非常受欢迎。在两场围棋锦标赛(其中一场是欧洲最大的)的调查中,我们测量了战略游戏中的认知反射和决策(使用经典的“选美”游戏)(N = 327)。我们发现,在我们的调查中,围棋选手的平均认知反射测试(CRT)得分为2.51分,高水平棋手(段位)的平均得分为2.80分。这个值很容易超过以前的测量值,比如对顶尖大学本科生的测量值。CRT分数与播放强度密切相关,但与播放频率无关。另一方面,经常玩游戏的人往往有更高的心理理论,无论他们的游戏实力如何。然而,自我报告的耐心与围棋强度或下棋频率没有统计学上的显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Reflection and Theory of Mind of Go Players.

Go is a classical Chinese mind game and a highly popular intellectual pursuit in East Asia. In a survey at two Go tournaments (one of them the largest in Europe), we measured cognitive reflection and decision in strategic games (using the classical "beauty contest" game) (N = 327). We found that Go players in our survey had outstanding average cognitive reflection test (CRT) scores: 2.51 among all participants and 2.80 among players of high master level (dan). This value easily outperforms previous measurements, for example, of undergraduates at top universities. The CRT score was closely related to the playing strength, but not to the frequency of playing. On the other hand, frequent players tended to have higher theory of mind, regardless of their playing strengths. However, selfreported patience was not statistically significantly correlated with Go strength or playing frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Cognitive Psychology
Advances in Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coronavirus Anxiety as Mediator in the Relationship of Depression and Fear of Death among Polish Adults in the Second Half of Life Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure Sensory Overlap for Specific Memories Only Matters for Poor Memory Traces The Influence of Fit Between Regulatory Focus and Decision-Making Strategies on Moral Judgment The Two-Factor Structure of Cognitive Flexibility: Tempo of Switching and Overcoming of Prepotent Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1