解决婴幼儿心理健康伦理问题的当前方法和未来方向

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-22 DOI:10.1002/imhj.22077
Paula D. Zeanah, Alison Steier, Izaak Lim, Jon Korfmacher, Charles H. Zeanah
{"title":"解决婴幼儿心理健康伦理问题的当前方法和未来方向","authors":"Paula D. Zeanah,&nbsp;Alison Steier,&nbsp;Izaak Lim,&nbsp;Jon Korfmacher,&nbsp;Charles H. Zeanah","doi":"10.1002/imhj.22077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we consider whether the field of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) needs its own code of ethics. We begin by describing unique features of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) and the diverse strategies that the field has developed to address complex clinical dilemmas, among them workforce development, clinical supports, policy statements, and statements of ethical values. Because of the field's interdisciplinary nature, we also consider how various contributing professions and organizations address ethical issues. While these are important resources that can inform ethical decision-making, we identify some of the limitations of the current approaches. We argue that it is time for the field of IECMH to take an intentional, systematic approach to directly address the complex and unique ethical dilemmas faced by infant and early childhood mental health practitioners, and we grapple with some of the challenges developing such a code might entail. We suggest several avenues for better understanding the scope of ethical issues and ethical decision-making processes in IECMH that could be used to support developing an ethics code that is responsive to the unique and challenging world of infant and early childhood mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48026,"journal":{"name":"Infant Mental Health Journal","volume":"44 5","pages":"625-637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current approaches and future directions for addressing ethics in infant and early childhood mental health\",\"authors\":\"Paula D. Zeanah,&nbsp;Alison Steier,&nbsp;Izaak Lim,&nbsp;Jon Korfmacher,&nbsp;Charles H. Zeanah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/imhj.22077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper, we consider whether the field of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) needs its own code of ethics. We begin by describing unique features of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) and the diverse strategies that the field has developed to address complex clinical dilemmas, among them workforce development, clinical supports, policy statements, and statements of ethical values. Because of the field's interdisciplinary nature, we also consider how various contributing professions and organizations address ethical issues. While these are important resources that can inform ethical decision-making, we identify some of the limitations of the current approaches. We argue that it is time for the field of IECMH to take an intentional, systematic approach to directly address the complex and unique ethical dilemmas faced by infant and early childhood mental health practitioners, and we grapple with some of the challenges developing such a code might entail. We suggest several avenues for better understanding the scope of ethical issues and ethical decision-making processes in IECMH that could be used to support developing an ethics code that is responsive to the unique and challenging world of infant and early childhood mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"625-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22077\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们考虑婴儿和幼儿心理健康(IECMH)领域是否需要自己的道德规范。我们首先描述了婴儿和幼儿心理健康(IECMH)的独特特征,以及该领域为解决复杂的临床困境而制定的各种策略,其中包括劳动力发展、临床支持、政策声明和道德价值观声明。由于该领域的跨学科性质,我们还考虑了各种贡献专业和组织如何解决道德问题。虽然这些都是可以为道德决策提供信息的重要资源,但我们发现了当前方法的一些局限性。我们认为,现在是IECMH领域采取有意识、系统的方法来直接解决婴儿和幼儿心理健康从业者面临的复杂而独特的道德困境的时候了,我们正在努力应对制定这样一个准则可能带来的一些挑战。我们提出了一些途径,以更好地理解IECMH中伦理问题和伦理决策过程的范围,这些途径可用于支持制定一项伦理准则,以应对婴儿和幼儿心理健康这一独特而富有挑战性的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current approaches and future directions for addressing ethics in infant and early childhood mental health

In this paper, we consider whether the field of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) needs its own code of ethics. We begin by describing unique features of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) and the diverse strategies that the field has developed to address complex clinical dilemmas, among them workforce development, clinical supports, policy statements, and statements of ethical values. Because of the field's interdisciplinary nature, we also consider how various contributing professions and organizations address ethical issues. While these are important resources that can inform ethical decision-making, we identify some of the limitations of the current approaches. We argue that it is time for the field of IECMH to take an intentional, systematic approach to directly address the complex and unique ethical dilemmas faced by infant and early childhood mental health practitioners, and we grapple with some of the challenges developing such a code might entail. We suggest several avenues for better understanding the scope of ethical issues and ethical decision-making processes in IECMH that could be used to support developing an ethics code that is responsive to the unique and challenging world of infant and early childhood mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Mental Health Journal
Infant Mental Health Journal PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Infant Mental Health Journal (IMHJ) is the official publication of the World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMH) and the Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health (MI-AIMH) and is copyrighted by MI-AIMH. The Infant Mental Health Journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles, literature reviews, program descriptions/evaluations, theoretical/conceptual papers and brief reports (clinical case studies and novel pilot studies) that focus on early social and emotional development and characteristics that influence social-emotional development from relationship-based perspectives. Examples of such influences include attachment relationships, early relationship development, caregiver-infant interactions, infant and early childhood mental health services, contextual and cultural influences on infant/toddler/child and family development, including parental/caregiver psychosocial characteristics and attachment history, prenatal experiences, and biological characteristics in interaction with relational environments that promote optimal social-emotional development or place it at higher risk. Research published in IMHJ focuses on the prenatal-age 5 period and employs relationship-based perspectives in key research questions and interpretation and implications of findings.
期刊最新文献
A decolonial perspective on Indigenous infant and early childhood mental health: Reclaiming Indigenous ways for the next seven generations. Baby steps of parenting: Turkish adaptation of Infancy Parenting Styles Questionnaire and mother- and infant-related characteristics affecting parenting in infancy. Parent and child gender effects in the relationship between attachment and both internalizing and externalizing problems of children between 2 and 5 years old: A dyadic perspective. A systematic review and meta-analysis of parental mentalization in fathers and mothers. Validating the parental reflective functioning questionnaire - infant version using a rasch model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1