三种灌溉激活方式对WaveOne Gold®单锉后污层和碎片去除效率的比较

Q2 Medicine Acta Informatica Medica Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136
Edgard Jabbour, Joseph Sabbagh, Edmond Koyess, Maya Feghali
{"title":"三种灌溉激活方式对WaveOne Gold®单锉后污层和碎片去除效率的比较","authors":"Edgard Jabbour,&nbsp;Joseph Sabbagh,&nbsp;Edmond Koyess,&nbsp;Maya Feghali","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/02/AIM-31-131.PMC10503892.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Activating Methods of Irrigation on Smear Layer- and Debris-Removal Efficiency After WaveOne Gold® Single File.\",\"authors\":\"Edgard Jabbour,&nbsp;Joseph Sabbagh,&nbsp;Edmond Koyess,&nbsp;Maya Feghali\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/02/AIM-31-131.PMC10503892.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根管治疗包括清洁、塑形和填充根管系统。灌溉是这个过程的化学部分,它确保了垃圾的完全清除。激活灌溉溶液将改善和加速这一过程。目的:本研究的目的是评估针头冲洗、EndoActivator®和Irrisafe®后,距孔1、3和5mm处的碎屑和涂抹层的去除情况。使用Primary WaveOne Gold®制备60颗单根牙。方法:将牙齿随机分为4组(n=15): A组,EndoActivator®灌洗1 min - B组,Irrisafe®灌洗1 min - C组,Irrisafe®灌洗30秒- d组,在扫描电镜下观察根管。数据分析采用Friedman和Wilcoxon检验。结果:与B、C和d组相比,A组的脏污明显更高。Irrisafe®清除脏污层的效果明显优于其他组。然而,激活技术显示的碎片和涂抹层比单独针刺少。结论:不论时间长短,Irrisafe®均表现出最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Three Activating Methods of Irrigation on Smear Layer- and Debris-Removal Efficiency After WaveOne Gold® Single File.

Background: An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.

Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.

Methods: Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.

Results: Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.

Conclusion: Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Carotid Stenosis and Pulsatile Index Measured by Transcranial Doppler. Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes. Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants. How Far Goes the Un-ethic of the Authors Who Submit the Articles to the Journals, Or, Better to Say, Their "Scientific Insolence"? Significance of Detecting Antierythrocyte Antibodies in Pretransfusion Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1