性行为不端的培训在英国医学院是否足够:一项横断面调查的结果和改进的机会。

Tia Dowling, Sarah Steele
{"title":"性行为不端的培训在英国医学院是否足够:一项横断面调查的结果和改进的机会。","authors":"Tia Dowling,&nbsp;Sarah Steele","doi":"10.1177/20542704231198732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sexual misconduct adversely affects the mental and physical health of millions of people each year and has been declared a global pandemic. Incidence in both educational and clinical settings remains high. In the last 5 years, the NHS spent over £4 million settling sexual misconduct-related claims. Effective prevention requires training across all stages of career, beginning in clinical school. Here, we explore training in the UK's medical schools to identify provision and areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests for data on training delivery and curricula content.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>34 public UK universities offering medical education.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Provision and delivery of training, mode of delivery, theme, and continuation of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 34 universities responded. Twenty-two identified offering training. Seventeen made it compulsory. A review of curricula identified, however, only 18 did more just than mentioned sexual misconduct. Nine offered training more than once. Twelve did not offer training, of which three identified no plans to offer such training in the future. The most common delivery modes for training were workshops and lectures. The training was most often within the sexual health curriculum, disconnecting it from professionalism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no standardisation of sexual harassment training across the UK's public medical schools. Many future doctors will not have received relevant education when they assume posts in the NHS. Considering the magnitude of this issue and its critical connection to professionalism and collegiality, universities and professional bodies urgently should address this deficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"14 9","pages":"20542704231198732"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is sexual misconduct training sufficient in the UK's medical schools: Results of a cross-sectional survey and opportunities for improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Tia Dowling,&nbsp;Sarah Steele\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20542704231198732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sexual misconduct adversely affects the mental and physical health of millions of people each year and has been declared a global pandemic. Incidence in both educational and clinical settings remains high. In the last 5 years, the NHS spent over £4 million settling sexual misconduct-related claims. Effective prevention requires training across all stages of career, beginning in clinical school. Here, we explore training in the UK's medical schools to identify provision and areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests for data on training delivery and curricula content.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>34 public UK universities offering medical education.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Provision and delivery of training, mode of delivery, theme, and continuation of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 34 universities responded. Twenty-two identified offering training. Seventeen made it compulsory. A review of curricula identified, however, only 18 did more just than mentioned sexual misconduct. Nine offered training more than once. Twelve did not offer training, of which three identified no plans to offer such training in the future. The most common delivery modes for training were workshops and lectures. The training was most often within the sexual health curriculum, disconnecting it from professionalism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no standardisation of sexual harassment training across the UK's public medical schools. Many future doctors will not have received relevant education when they assume posts in the NHS. Considering the magnitude of this issue and its critical connection to professionalism and collegiality, universities and professional bodies urgently should address this deficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Open\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"20542704231198732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704231198732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704231198732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不当性行为每年对数百万人的身心健康产生不利影响,并已被宣布为全球流行病。在教育和临床环境中的发病率仍然很高。在过去的5年里,NHS花费了400多万英镑来解决与性行为不当有关的索赔。有效的预防需要在职业生涯的各个阶段进行培训,从临床学校开始。在这里,我们探讨了英国医学院的培训,以确定提供和改进的领域。设计:2000年信息自由法案要求提供培训交付和课程内容的数据。环境:34所提供医学教育的英国公立大学。参与者:不适用。主要衡量指标:培训的提供和交付、交付模式、主题和培训的继续。结果:34所大学均有回应。22个已确定提供培训。17个国家规定这是强制性的。然而,一项对课程的审查发现,只有18个学校的性行为不检点。其中九家公司不止一次提供培训。12个国家没有提供培训,其中3个国家确定今后没有提供这种培训的计划。最常见的培训方式是讲习班和讲座。培训通常是在性健康课程中进行的,与专业脱节。结论:英国公立医学院的性骚扰培训没有标准化。许多未来的医生在NHS任职时都没有接受过相关的教育。考虑到这一问题的严重性及其与专业精神和合作关系的关键联系,大学和专业机构应紧急解决这一缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is sexual misconduct training sufficient in the UK's medical schools: Results of a cross-sectional survey and opportunities for improvement.

Objective: Sexual misconduct adversely affects the mental and physical health of millions of people each year and has been declared a global pandemic. Incidence in both educational and clinical settings remains high. In the last 5 years, the NHS spent over £4 million settling sexual misconduct-related claims. Effective prevention requires training across all stages of career, beginning in clinical school. Here, we explore training in the UK's medical schools to identify provision and areas for improvement.

Design: Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests for data on training delivery and curricula content.

Setting: 34 public UK universities offering medical education.

Participants: not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Provision and delivery of training, mode of delivery, theme, and continuation of training.

Results: All 34 universities responded. Twenty-two identified offering training. Seventeen made it compulsory. A review of curricula identified, however, only 18 did more just than mentioned sexual misconduct. Nine offered training more than once. Twelve did not offer training, of which three identified no plans to offer such training in the future. The most common delivery modes for training were workshops and lectures. The training was most often within the sexual health curriculum, disconnecting it from professionalism.

Conclusions: There is no standardisation of sexual harassment training across the UK's public medical schools. Many future doctors will not have received relevant education when they assume posts in the NHS. Considering the magnitude of this issue and its critical connection to professionalism and collegiality, universities and professional bodies urgently should address this deficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Providing personalised care for people with tuberculosis: an evaluation of enhanced case management in a UK TB Network 2013 to 2021. Redeployment experiences of healthcare workers in the UK during COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis from the nationwide UK-REACH study. Surgical reconstruction for spasticity and contracture: An underutilised rehabilitative strategy of adult stroke. Long COVID symptoms and demographic associations: A retrospective case series study using healthcare application data. Racial microaggressions within the UK Healthcare System: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1