从评估到实施:加强多部门抗微生物药物耐药性控制能力的有希望的做法。

Mohan P Joshi, Fozo Alombah, Niranjan Konduri, Antoine Ndiaye, Ndinda Kusu, Reuben Kiggundu, Edgar Peter Lusaya, Robert Tuala Tuala, Martha Embrey, Tamara Hafner, Ousmane Traore, Mame Mbaye, Babatunde Akinola, Denylson Namburete, Alphonse Acho, Yacouba Hema, Workineh Getahun, Md Abu Sayem, Emmanuel Nfor
{"title":"从评估到实施:加强多部门抗微生物药物耐药性控制能力的有希望的做法。","authors":"Mohan P Joshi,&nbsp;Fozo Alombah,&nbsp;Niranjan Konduri,&nbsp;Antoine Ndiaye,&nbsp;Ndinda Kusu,&nbsp;Reuben Kiggundu,&nbsp;Edgar Peter Lusaya,&nbsp;Robert Tuala Tuala,&nbsp;Martha Embrey,&nbsp;Tamara Hafner,&nbsp;Ousmane Traore,&nbsp;Mame Mbaye,&nbsp;Babatunde Akinola,&nbsp;Denylson Namburete,&nbsp;Alphonse Acho,&nbsp;Yacouba Hema,&nbsp;Workineh Getahun,&nbsp;Md Abu Sayem,&nbsp;Emmanuel Nfor","doi":"10.1186/s42522-023-00081-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global threat to human, animal, and environmental health. AMR is a technical area in the Global Health Security Agenda initiative which uses the Joint External Evaluation tool to evaluate national AMR containment capacity. This paper describes four promising practices for strengthening national antimicrobial resistance containment capacity based on the experiences of the US Agency for International Development's Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services Program work with 13 countries to implement their national action plans on AMR in the areas of multisectoral coordination, infection prevention and control, and antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use the World Health Organization (WHO) Benchmarks on International Health Regulations Capacities (2019) to guide national, subnational, and facility actions that advance Joint External Evaluation capacity levels from 1 (no capacity) to 5 (sustainable capacity). Our technical approach is based on scoping visits, baseline Joint External Evaluation scores, benchmarks tool guidance, and country resources and priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We gleaned four promising practices to achieve AMR containment objectives: (1) implement appropriate actions using the WHO benchmarks tool, which prioritizes actions, making it easier for countries to incrementally increase their Joint External Evaluation capacity from level 1 to 5; (2) integrate AMR into national and global agendas. Ongoing agendas and programs at international, regional, and national levels provide opportunities to mainstream and interlink AMR containment efforts; (3) improve governance through multisectoral coordination on AMR. Strengthening multisectoral bodies' and their technical working groups' governance improved functioning, which led to better engagement with animal/agricultural sectors and a more coordinated COVID-19 pandemic response; and (4) mobilize and diversify funding for AMR containment. Long-term funding from diversified funding streams is vital for advancing and sustaining countries' Joint External Evaluation capacities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Global Health Security Agenda work has provided practical support to countries to frame and conduct AMR containment actions in terms of pandemic preparedness and health security. The WHO benchmarks tool that Global Health Security Agenda uses serves as a standardized organizing framework to prioritize capacity-appropriate AMR containment actions and transfer skills to help operationalize national action plans on AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"5 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101730/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving from assessments to implementation: promising practices for strengthening multisectoral antimicrobial resistance containment capacity.\",\"authors\":\"Mohan P Joshi,&nbsp;Fozo Alombah,&nbsp;Niranjan Konduri,&nbsp;Antoine Ndiaye,&nbsp;Ndinda Kusu,&nbsp;Reuben Kiggundu,&nbsp;Edgar Peter Lusaya,&nbsp;Robert Tuala Tuala,&nbsp;Martha Embrey,&nbsp;Tamara Hafner,&nbsp;Ousmane Traore,&nbsp;Mame Mbaye,&nbsp;Babatunde Akinola,&nbsp;Denylson Namburete,&nbsp;Alphonse Acho,&nbsp;Yacouba Hema,&nbsp;Workineh Getahun,&nbsp;Md Abu Sayem,&nbsp;Emmanuel Nfor\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42522-023-00081-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global threat to human, animal, and environmental health. AMR is a technical area in the Global Health Security Agenda initiative which uses the Joint External Evaluation tool to evaluate national AMR containment capacity. This paper describes four promising practices for strengthening national antimicrobial resistance containment capacity based on the experiences of the US Agency for International Development's Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services Program work with 13 countries to implement their national action plans on AMR in the areas of multisectoral coordination, infection prevention and control, and antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use the World Health Organization (WHO) Benchmarks on International Health Regulations Capacities (2019) to guide national, subnational, and facility actions that advance Joint External Evaluation capacity levels from 1 (no capacity) to 5 (sustainable capacity). Our technical approach is based on scoping visits, baseline Joint External Evaluation scores, benchmarks tool guidance, and country resources and priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We gleaned four promising practices to achieve AMR containment objectives: (1) implement appropriate actions using the WHO benchmarks tool, which prioritizes actions, making it easier for countries to incrementally increase their Joint External Evaluation capacity from level 1 to 5; (2) integrate AMR into national and global agendas. Ongoing agendas and programs at international, regional, and national levels provide opportunities to mainstream and interlink AMR containment efforts; (3) improve governance through multisectoral coordination on AMR. Strengthening multisectoral bodies' and their technical working groups' governance improved functioning, which led to better engagement with animal/agricultural sectors and a more coordinated COVID-19 pandemic response; and (4) mobilize and diversify funding for AMR containment. Long-term funding from diversified funding streams is vital for advancing and sustaining countries' Joint External Evaluation capacities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Global Health Security Agenda work has provided practical support to countries to frame and conduct AMR containment actions in terms of pandemic preparedness and health security. The WHO benchmarks tool that Global Health Security Agenda uses serves as a standardized organizing framework to prioritize capacity-appropriate AMR containment actions and transfer skills to help operationalize national action plans on AMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-023-00081-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-023-00081-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)对人类、动物和环境健康构成全球性威胁。抗微生物药物耐药性是全球卫生安全议程倡议中的一个技术领域,该倡议使用联合外部评估工具来评估国家抗微生物药物耐药性控制能力。本文根据美国国际开发署药品、技术和药物服务方案与13个国家合作,在多部门协调、感染预防和控制以及抗菌素管理等领域实施抗菌素耐药性国家行动计划的经验,介绍了加强国家抗微生物药物耐药性控制能力的四种有希望的做法。方法:我们使用世界卫生组织(世卫组织)《国际卫生条例能力基准(2019年)》来指导国家、地方和机构采取行动,将联合外部评估能力水平从1级(无能力)提高到5级(可持续能力)。我们的技术方法基于范围考察、基线联合外部评估分数、基准工具指导以及国家资源和优先事项。结果:我们收集了实现抗微生物药物耐药性控制目标的四种有希望的做法:(1)使用世卫组织基准工具实施适当的行动,该工具对行动进行优先排序,使各国更容易逐步将其联合外部评估能力从1级提高到5级;(2)将抗微生物药物耐药性纳入国家和全球议程。国际、区域和国家各级正在进行的议程和规划为将抗微生物药物耐药性遏制工作主流化和相互联系提供了机会;(3)通过多部门协调改善抗微生物药物耐药性治理。加强多部门机构及其技术工作组的治理,改善了职能,从而更好地与动物/农业部门合作,并更加协调地应对COVID-19大流行;(4)为遏制抗微生物药物耐药性动员资金并使其多样化。来自多样化资金流的长期供资对于推进和维持各国的联合外部评价能力至关重要。结论:全球卫生安全议程的工作为各国在大流行防范和卫生安全方面制定和实施抗微生物药物耐药性遏制行动提供了实际支持。《全球卫生安全议程》使用的世卫组织基准工具作为一个标准化的组织框架,优先考虑适合能力的抗微生物药物耐药性遏制行动,并转让技能,以帮助实施抗微生物药物耐药性国家行动计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moving from assessments to implementation: promising practices for strengthening multisectoral antimicrobial resistance containment capacity.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global threat to human, animal, and environmental health. AMR is a technical area in the Global Health Security Agenda initiative which uses the Joint External Evaluation tool to evaluate national AMR containment capacity. This paper describes four promising practices for strengthening national antimicrobial resistance containment capacity based on the experiences of the US Agency for International Development's Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services Program work with 13 countries to implement their national action plans on AMR in the areas of multisectoral coordination, infection prevention and control, and antimicrobial stewardship.

Methods: We use the World Health Organization (WHO) Benchmarks on International Health Regulations Capacities (2019) to guide national, subnational, and facility actions that advance Joint External Evaluation capacity levels from 1 (no capacity) to 5 (sustainable capacity). Our technical approach is based on scoping visits, baseline Joint External Evaluation scores, benchmarks tool guidance, and country resources and priorities.

Results: We gleaned four promising practices to achieve AMR containment objectives: (1) implement appropriate actions using the WHO benchmarks tool, which prioritizes actions, making it easier for countries to incrementally increase their Joint External Evaluation capacity from level 1 to 5; (2) integrate AMR into national and global agendas. Ongoing agendas and programs at international, regional, and national levels provide opportunities to mainstream and interlink AMR containment efforts; (3) improve governance through multisectoral coordination on AMR. Strengthening multisectoral bodies' and their technical working groups' governance improved functioning, which led to better engagement with animal/agricultural sectors and a more coordinated COVID-19 pandemic response; and (4) mobilize and diversify funding for AMR containment. Long-term funding from diversified funding streams is vital for advancing and sustaining countries' Joint External Evaluation capacities.

Conclusions: The Global Health Security Agenda work has provided practical support to countries to frame and conduct AMR containment actions in terms of pandemic preparedness and health security. The WHO benchmarks tool that Global Health Security Agenda uses serves as a standardized organizing framework to prioritize capacity-appropriate AMR containment actions and transfer skills to help operationalize national action plans on AMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) Drug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) - producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species from the views of one-health approach in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1